数字贸易发展战略与治理途径的比较分析

Ying Chen, Yuning Gao
{"title":"数字贸易发展战略与治理途径的比较分析","authors":"Ying Chen,&nbsp;Yuning Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.jdec.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the process of digitalization, digital trade has become the primary pattern of international trade, and digital platforms and data have become two essential ingredients in digital trade. Meanwhile, the governance of digital trade has been a critical issue in international cooperation and domestic regulation. The governance system on digital trade is fragmented, and the governance approaches of the leading economies show divergences and conflicts. With the aim to explore the factors for the policy conflicts, this article selects the United States, the European Union, China, and India as typical cases to analyze their trade development strategies and digital trade rules comparatively. We find that the four economies adopt differentiated digital trade policies and data governance approaches on the basis of digital industrial benefits. We concluded that the government implements trade policies strategically to influence the distribution of digital trade gains and increase the share of the digital industry by intervening in cross-border data flows. This article contributes to current research by keeping up with the latest progress in digital trade governance and making theoretical analyses on strategic digital trade policies and governance approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Economy","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000031/pdfft?md5=73bef9df1929678374f4d5be6a44726e&pid=1-s2.0-S2773067023000031-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of digital trade development strategies and governance approaches\",\"authors\":\"Ying Chen,&nbsp;Yuning Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdec.2023.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the process of digitalization, digital trade has become the primary pattern of international trade, and digital platforms and data have become two essential ingredients in digital trade. Meanwhile, the governance of digital trade has been a critical issue in international cooperation and domestic regulation. The governance system on digital trade is fragmented, and the governance approaches of the leading economies show divergences and conflicts. With the aim to explore the factors for the policy conflicts, this article selects the United States, the European Union, China, and India as typical cases to analyze their trade development strategies and digital trade rules comparatively. We find that the four economies adopt differentiated digital trade policies and data governance approaches on the basis of digital industrial benefits. We concluded that the government implements trade policies strategically to influence the distribution of digital trade gains and increase the share of the digital industry by intervening in cross-border data flows. This article contributes to current research by keeping up with the latest progress in digital trade governance and making theoretical analyses on strategic digital trade policies and governance approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Economy\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 227-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000031/pdfft?md5=73bef9df1929678374f4d5be6a44726e&pid=1-s2.0-S2773067023000031-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067023000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着数字化进程的推进,数字贸易已成为国际贸易的主要方式,数字平台和数据已成为数字贸易的两大要素。与此同时,数字贸易的治理一直是国际合作和国内监管的关键问题。数字贸易治理体系碎片化,主要经济体治理方式存在分歧和冲突。本文选取美国、欧盟、中国和印度作为典型案例,对其贸易发展战略和数字贸易规则进行比较分析,探讨政策冲突的影响因素。我们发现,四个经济体在数字产业利益的基础上采取了差异化的数字贸易政策和数据治理方式。我们的结论是,政府战略性地实施贸易政策,通过干预跨境数据流动来影响数字贸易收益的分配,并增加数字产业的份额。本文紧跟数字贸易治理的最新进展,对战略性数字贸易政策和治理方法进行理论分析,为当前的研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of digital trade development strategies and governance approaches

With the process of digitalization, digital trade has become the primary pattern of international trade, and digital platforms and data have become two essential ingredients in digital trade. Meanwhile, the governance of digital trade has been a critical issue in international cooperation and domestic regulation. The governance system on digital trade is fragmented, and the governance approaches of the leading economies show divergences and conflicts. With the aim to explore the factors for the policy conflicts, this article selects the United States, the European Union, China, and India as typical cases to analyze their trade development strategies and digital trade rules comparatively. We find that the four economies adopt differentiated digital trade policies and data governance approaches on the basis of digital industrial benefits. We concluded that the government implements trade policies strategically to influence the distribution of digital trade gains and increase the share of the digital industry by intervening in cross-border data flows. This article contributes to current research by keeping up with the latest progress in digital trade governance and making theoretical analyses on strategic digital trade policies and governance approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does digital economy promote regional green innovation? An empirical study based on the transmission effect and threshold effect of marketization From screen to reality: How AR drives consumer engagement and purchase intention Improve the prediction in the digital Era: Causal feature selection with minimum redundancy The impact of digital governance on tourism development The environmental cost of cryptocurrency: Assessing carbon emissions from bitcoin mining in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1