设计节能与实现节能差距估算的建筑评估方法概念

Sandro Nižetić , Agis M. Papadopoulos
{"title":"设计节能与实现节能差距估算的建筑评估方法概念","authors":"Sandro Nižetić ,&nbsp;Agis M. Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nowadays, despite the plethora of existing standards and calculation methodologies, i.e. procedures assessing a building's energy efficiency, it is unfortunately common to monitor significant differences between designed and achieved energy savings in practice. This is a problem that in extremis may lead to contractual and even legal claims, but in any case sheds doubt on the whole energy efficiency approach and finally presents one of the barriers for investments in energy efficiency projects. It should therefore be addressed and in order to achieve this, one has to understand the problem: Numerous and often intertwined factors lead to the aforementioned discrepancy, based on the differences in methodological approaches and standards adopted as well as the boundary conditions they use, they will all be discussed in the paper.</p><p>Furthermore, a novel building evaluation methodology will be presented; its conceptual approach addresses the different influences addressed and taken into account, as they can significantly affect the level of achieved energy savings in buildings. In that sense, the main purpose of the proposed methodology is to evaluate in advance, the difference rate between designed and achieved energy savings. This approach can be a useful decision tool in the phase where energy efficiency projects are rated and evaluated for possible investments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20460,"journal":{"name":"Procedia environmental sciences","volume":"38 ","pages":"Pages 538-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.118","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concept of Building Evaluation Methodology for Gap Estimation Between Designed and Achieved Energy Savings\",\"authors\":\"Sandro Nižetić ,&nbsp;Agis M. Papadopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nowadays, despite the plethora of existing standards and calculation methodologies, i.e. procedures assessing a building's energy efficiency, it is unfortunately common to monitor significant differences between designed and achieved energy savings in practice. This is a problem that in extremis may lead to contractual and even legal claims, but in any case sheds doubt on the whole energy efficiency approach and finally presents one of the barriers for investments in energy efficiency projects. It should therefore be addressed and in order to achieve this, one has to understand the problem: Numerous and often intertwined factors lead to the aforementioned discrepancy, based on the differences in methodological approaches and standards adopted as well as the boundary conditions they use, they will all be discussed in the paper.</p><p>Furthermore, a novel building evaluation methodology will be presented; its conceptual approach addresses the different influences addressed and taken into account, as they can significantly affect the level of achieved energy savings in buildings. In that sense, the main purpose of the proposed methodology is to evaluate in advance, the difference rate between designed and achieved energy savings. This approach can be a useful decision tool in the phase where energy efficiency projects are rated and evaluated for possible investments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia environmental sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 538-545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.118\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia environmental sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029617301226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029617301226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

如今,尽管现有的标准和计算方法(即评估建筑物能源效率的程序)过多,但不幸的是,在实际操作中,监测设计和实现的节能之间的显著差异是很常见的。这是一个在极端情况下可能导致合同甚至法律索赔的问题,但无论如何都会对整个能源效率方法产生怀疑,并最终成为能源效率项目投资的障碍之一。因此,它应该得到解决,为了实现这一目标,人们必须理解这个问题:众多且经常交织在一起的因素导致上述差异,基于方法方法和采用的标准的差异,以及他们使用的边界条件,他们都将在本文中讨论。此外,将提出一种新的建筑评估方法;它的概念方法解决了所处理和考虑的不同影响,因为它们可以显著影响建筑物实现的节能水平。从这个意义上说,所建议的方法的主要目的是提前评估设计和实现的节能之间的差异率。在对能效项目进行评级和投资评估的阶段,这种方法是一种有用的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concept of Building Evaluation Methodology for Gap Estimation Between Designed and Achieved Energy Savings

Nowadays, despite the plethora of existing standards and calculation methodologies, i.e. procedures assessing a building's energy efficiency, it is unfortunately common to monitor significant differences between designed and achieved energy savings in practice. This is a problem that in extremis may lead to contractual and even legal claims, but in any case sheds doubt on the whole energy efficiency approach and finally presents one of the barriers for investments in energy efficiency projects. It should therefore be addressed and in order to achieve this, one has to understand the problem: Numerous and often intertwined factors lead to the aforementioned discrepancy, based on the differences in methodological approaches and standards adopted as well as the boundary conditions they use, they will all be discussed in the paper.

Furthermore, a novel building evaluation methodology will be presented; its conceptual approach addresses the different influences addressed and taken into account, as they can significantly affect the level of achieved energy savings in buildings. In that sense, the main purpose of the proposed methodology is to evaluate in advance, the difference rate between designed and achieved energy savings. This approach can be a useful decision tool in the phase where energy efficiency projects are rated and evaluated for possible investments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Editorial Review of the Greek Legislative Framework for Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) and Suggestions for its Improvement Affordable and Common Modes of Transportation in Developing Cities and Their Effect on the Sustainability of Streets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1