99mTC-DTPA和99mTC-DMSA对儿童相对肾功能的影响

F. Akter, Nure Alam Abdullah, M. A. Momin, M. Reza
{"title":"99mTC-DTPA和99mTC-DMSA对儿童相对肾功能的影响","authors":"F. Akter, Nure Alam Abdullah, M. A. Momin, M. Reza","doi":"10.3329/JBAS.V44I2.51455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radionuclides are widely used to study the relative renal functions (RRFs) for kidney patients. This work reports the determination of the RRFs using the technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc-DMSA) and technetium-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) for children having kidney diseases. The two methods are then compared to find the choice of scintigraphy for a particular type of disease. A total of 65 child kidney patients of ages 5 months - 16 years were the representative samples of the study. The mean RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA was found as  and respectively, for the left and right kidneys. On the other hand, the values are  and  respectively, using 99mTc-DMSA. a significant positive correlation () were found between the RRFs calculated with the two scanning methods in Pearson correlation analysis. In one way ANOVA test, we did not find any difference between the RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA and 99mTc-DMSA between the left and right kidneys. In Bland-Altman Plots, no mean difference was found between the two scanning methods and the correlation limit lies between -13.5 and12.6. The present study suggests using a single method for a particular type of disease. 99mTc-DMSA is the primary choice for the evaluation of RRF since it is easy, inexpensive and also provides cortical morphology, renal scar and cyst evaluation. But for glomerular filtration rate and renogram curve, 99mTc-DTPA should be the obvious selection as 99mTc-DMSA fails to provide any information for these cases. \nJournal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 2, 109-119, 2020","PeriodicalId":15109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative renal functions for children using 99mTC-DTPA and 99mTC-DMSA\",\"authors\":\"F. Akter, Nure Alam Abdullah, M. A. Momin, M. Reza\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/JBAS.V44I2.51455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radionuclides are widely used to study the relative renal functions (RRFs) for kidney patients. This work reports the determination of the RRFs using the technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc-DMSA) and technetium-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) for children having kidney diseases. The two methods are then compared to find the choice of scintigraphy for a particular type of disease. A total of 65 child kidney patients of ages 5 months - 16 years were the representative samples of the study. The mean RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA was found as  and respectively, for the left and right kidneys. On the other hand, the values are  and  respectively, using 99mTc-DMSA. a significant positive correlation () were found between the RRFs calculated with the two scanning methods in Pearson correlation analysis. In one way ANOVA test, we did not find any difference between the RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA and 99mTc-DMSA between the left and right kidneys. In Bland-Altman Plots, no mean difference was found between the two scanning methods and the correlation limit lies between -13.5 and12.6. The present study suggests using a single method for a particular type of disease. 99mTc-DMSA is the primary choice for the evaluation of RRF since it is easy, inexpensive and also provides cortical morphology, renal scar and cyst evaluation. But for glomerular filtration rate and renogram curve, 99mTc-DTPA should be the obvious selection as 99mTc-DMSA fails to provide any information for these cases. \\nJournal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 2, 109-119, 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":15109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"109-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/JBAS.V44I2.51455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JBAS.V44I2.51455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射性核素被广泛用于研究肾脏患者的相对肾功能(RRFs)。本工作报道了使用锝-99m二巯基琥珀酸(99mTc-DMSA)和锝-99m二乙烯三胺-五乙酸(99mTc-DTPA)测定肾脏疾病儿童的RRFs。然后对这两种方法进行比较,以找到针对特定类型疾病的闪烁成像选择。65例5个月~ 16岁的儿童肾病患者为本研究的代表性样本。用99mTc-DTPA计算的平均RRFs分别为左肾和右肾。另一方面,使用99mTc-DMSA时,值分别为和。在Pearson相关分析中,两种扫描方法计算的RRFs之间存在显著的正相关()。在单因素方差分析检验中,我们没有发现左肾和右肾用99mTc-DTPA和99mTc-DMSA计算的RRFs有任何差异。在Bland-Altman图中,两种扫描方法之间没有平均差异,相关极限在-13.5 ~ 12.6之间。目前的研究建议对特定类型的疾病使用单一方法。99mTc-DMSA是评估RRF的首选方法,因为它简单、便宜,还能提供皮质形态学、肾瘢痕和囊肿的评估。但对于肾小球滤过率和肾图曲线,99mTc-DTPA应该是明显的选择,因为99mTc-DMSA不能提供任何信息。《孟加拉国科学院学报》,第44卷,第2期,109-119,2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relative renal functions for children using 99mTC-DTPA and 99mTC-DMSA
Radionuclides are widely used to study the relative renal functions (RRFs) for kidney patients. This work reports the determination of the RRFs using the technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc-DMSA) and technetium-99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) for children having kidney diseases. The two methods are then compared to find the choice of scintigraphy for a particular type of disease. A total of 65 child kidney patients of ages 5 months - 16 years were the representative samples of the study. The mean RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA was found as  and respectively, for the left and right kidneys. On the other hand, the values are  and  respectively, using 99mTc-DMSA. a significant positive correlation () were found between the RRFs calculated with the two scanning methods in Pearson correlation analysis. In one way ANOVA test, we did not find any difference between the RRFs calculated with 99mTc-DTPA and 99mTc-DMSA between the left and right kidneys. In Bland-Altman Plots, no mean difference was found between the two scanning methods and the correlation limit lies between -13.5 and12.6. The present study suggests using a single method for a particular type of disease. 99mTc-DMSA is the primary choice for the evaluation of RRF since it is easy, inexpensive and also provides cortical morphology, renal scar and cyst evaluation. But for glomerular filtration rate and renogram curve, 99mTc-DTPA should be the obvious selection as 99mTc-DMSA fails to provide any information for these cases. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 2, 109-119, 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the unknown: a butterfly checklist of the Adampur forest in Bangladesh Effect of p-type doped buffer layer on the structural and magnetic properties of (Zn,Fe)Te dilute magnetic semiconductor T_0 Separation Axioms in Intuitionistic Topological Spaces Cyclic voltammetric behavior of crystal violet in aqueous solution: Correlation with dissolved states of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide Bacterial profiles and multi-drug resistance patterns in bacterial isolates associated with freshwater fish infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1