托伦斯制度下的受让人责任:若干类别错误

M. Bryan
{"title":"托伦斯制度下的受让人责任:若干类别错误","authors":"M. Bryan","doi":"10.5040/9781472560223.ch-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The claim to the return of specific property to a trust fund or to a fiduciary who must apply it towards the fulfilment of the purposes of the fiduciary relationship, such as a joint venture, is a claim to enforce a pre-existing equitable interest in property, is established, followed by a demonstration of dispute in Farah that relates to the enforcement of a subsisting equitable interest in property subject to the application of the doctrine of notice and the principles of title registration that apply to the facts of Farah is examined. It is argued that property rights be enforced as property rights alone and enforcement of property rights should not be dressed in the clothing of equitable doctrines which serve other purposes.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recipient Liability under the Torrens System: Some Category Errors\",\"authors\":\"M. Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781472560223.ch-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The claim to the return of specific property to a trust fund or to a fiduciary who must apply it towards the fulfilment of the purposes of the fiduciary relationship, such as a joint venture, is a claim to enforce a pre-existing equitable interest in property, is established, followed by a demonstration of dispute in Farah that relates to the enforcement of a subsisting equitable interest in property subject to the application of the doctrine of notice and the principles of title registration that apply to the facts of Farah is examined. It is argued that property rights be enforced as property rights alone and enforcement of property rights should not be dressed in the clothing of equitable doctrines which serve other purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The University of Queensland law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560223.ch-017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560223.ch-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

要求将特定财产返还给信托基金或受托人,受托人必须将其用于实现信托关系的目的,例如合资企业,是要求强制执行财产中预先存在的衡平法权益,成立;其次是对Farah案件中存在的衡平法上的财产权益的强制执行的争议的论证,该争议是在适用于Farah案件事实的通知原则和所有权登记原则的前提下进行的。有人认为,财产权只能作为财产权来执行,财产权的执行不应披上为其他目的服务的衡平法理论的外衣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recipient Liability under the Torrens System: Some Category Errors
The claim to the return of specific property to a trust fund or to a fiduciary who must apply it towards the fulfilment of the purposes of the fiduciary relationship, such as a joint venture, is a claim to enforce a pre-existing equitable interest in property, is established, followed by a demonstration of dispute in Farah that relates to the enforcement of a subsisting equitable interest in property subject to the application of the doctrine of notice and the principles of title registration that apply to the facts of Farah is examined. It is argued that property rights be enforced as property rights alone and enforcement of property rights should not be dressed in the clothing of equitable doctrines which serve other purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robodebt and Novel Data Technologies in the Public Sector The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces Lending on the Edge Substantive Equality and the Possibilities of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1