与传统方法相比,改良技术对农业效益的影响

A. Jahan, R. Arunjyothi, M. Reddy, T. P. Reddy, M. Rajasheker, A. Shankar, B. Rajasheker, K. Krishna
{"title":"与传统方法相比,改良技术对农业效益的影响","authors":"A. Jahan, R. Arunjyothi, M. Reddy, T. P. Reddy, M. Rajasheker, A. Shankar, B. Rajasheker, K. Krishna","doi":"10.22271/TPI.2021.V10.I2H.5728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Abelmoscgus esculentus pricking is a laborious and time consuming work causing drudgery to farm women. The present study 10 okra cultivating women farmers were selected from five different villages of Nagarkurnool district. The study was carried out for 3 years. In this a comparison of okra ring cutter with gloves and without ring cutter and gloves to harvest okra was studied and resuts showns as the total average harvest using traditional method was 10.25 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 16.7 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 37.71 kg/ hour in the year 2016. In the year 2017 the total average harvest using traditional method was 07.99 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.0 kg/ hour. The average increase in the harvest is 38.61 kg/ hour. In the year 2018 the total average harvest using traditional method was 8.3 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.4 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 39.71 kg/ hour.","PeriodicalId":23030,"journal":{"name":"The Pharma Innovation Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"547-549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of harvesting Abelmoschus esculentus (OKRA) with improved technology for profitable agriculture compared to traditional methods\",\"authors\":\"A. Jahan, R. Arunjyothi, M. Reddy, T. P. Reddy, M. Rajasheker, A. Shankar, B. Rajasheker, K. Krishna\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/TPI.2021.V10.I2H.5728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Abelmoscgus esculentus pricking is a laborious and time consuming work causing drudgery to farm women. The present study 10 okra cultivating women farmers were selected from five different villages of Nagarkurnool district. The study was carried out for 3 years. In this a comparison of okra ring cutter with gloves and without ring cutter and gloves to harvest okra was studied and resuts showns as the total average harvest using traditional method was 10.25 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 16.7 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 37.71 kg/ hour in the year 2016. In the year 2017 the total average harvest using traditional method was 07.99 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.0 kg/ hour. The average increase in the harvest is 38.61 kg/ hour. In the year 2018 the total average harvest using traditional method was 8.3 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.4 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 39.71 kg/ hour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Pharma Innovation Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"547-549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Pharma Innovation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/TPI.2021.V10.I2H.5728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pharma Innovation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/TPI.2021.V10.I2H.5728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对农业妇女来说,刺棘是一项费时费力的苦差事。本研究选取了长崎县5个不同村庄的10名种植秋葵的女农民。这项研究进行了3年。本研究比较了带手套和不带手套的秋葵切环器收割秋葵的效果,结果表明,传统方法的平均总收获量为10.25 kg/ h,而带手套和切环器的平均总收获量为16.7 kg/ h。2016年的平均产量增长为37.71公斤/小时。2017年,使用传统方法的总平均收获量为7.99公斤/小时,而使用手套和切环器的平均收获量为13.0公斤/小时。产量平均增加38.61公斤/小时。2018年,使用传统方法的总平均收获量为8.3公斤/小时,而使用手套和切环器的平均收获量为13.4公斤/小时。平均增产39.71公斤/小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of harvesting Abelmoschus esculentus (OKRA) with improved technology for profitable agriculture compared to traditional methods
The Abelmoscgus esculentus pricking is a laborious and time consuming work causing drudgery to farm women. The present study 10 okra cultivating women farmers were selected from five different villages of Nagarkurnool district. The study was carried out for 3 years. In this a comparison of okra ring cutter with gloves and without ring cutter and gloves to harvest okra was studied and resuts showns as the total average harvest using traditional method was 10.25 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 16.7 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 37.71 kg/ hour in the year 2016. In the year 2017 the total average harvest using traditional method was 07.99 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.0 kg/ hour. The average increase in the harvest is 38.61 kg/ hour. In the year 2018 the total average harvest using traditional method was 8.3 kg/ hour where as with gloves and ring cutter is 13.4 kg/ hour. The average increase in harvest is 39.71 kg/ hour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colored grains: Chemistry, health benefits and processing Pasta: Raw materials, processing and quality improvement Honey crystallization: Mechanism, evaluation and application A comprehensive review on antinutritional factors of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pattern of induced estrus during superovulatory programme in Kangayam donor cows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1