日本文献中针灸临床试验的系统综述

Hiroshi Tsukayama BA, LAc , Hitoshi Yamashita BS, LAc
{"title":"日本文献中针灸临床试验的系统综述","authors":"Hiroshi Tsukayama BA, LAc ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yamashita BS, LAc","doi":"10.1054/caom.2002.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> <!-->To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.</p><p><em>Methods:</em> <!-->We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (<em>Japana Centra Revuo Medicina</em>) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.</p><p><em>Results:</em> <!-->We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.</p><p><em>Conclusions:</em> <!-->Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2002.0006","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of clinical trials on acupuncture in the Japanese literature\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Tsukayama BA, LAc ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Yamashita BS, LAc\",\"doi\":\"10.1054/caom.2002.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Objective:</em> <!-->To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.</p><p><em>Methods:</em> <!-->We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (<em>Japana Centra Revuo Medicina</em>) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.</p><p><em>Results:</em> <!-->We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.</p><p><em>Conclusions:</em> <!-->Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 105-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2002.0006\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146114490290006X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146114490290006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:评价和介绍日本针灸临床试验的现状。方法:我们使用“Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Centra Revuo Medicina) CD-ROM版本(1987-2000年)”和独立检索对日本发表的对照临床试验(CCTs)进行数据库检索。包括评估针刺疗效的平行或交叉设计的试验。结果:我们检索到32篇已发表的论文(全文24篇,摘要8篇),共报道了34项试验。其中只有两个被列入Medline或Cochrane图书馆。检查的条件是肌肉骨骼疼痛(20个试验,包括10个腰痛和3个坐骨神经痛),颈部和肩部僵硬(4个试验)和其他条件(10个试验)。33项试验被描述为随机,尽管7项试验采用准随机方法。采用Jadad质量评价5分制评分,平均得分为1.85±1.16 (SD)。18例(53%)的报告是为了确定一种更有效的针灸方法,这些报告将某种类型的针灸与另一种类型的针灸或特定的附加穴位进行比较。结论:很少在西方数据库中列出的日本针灸cct在几个方面与西方报告不同。包括由不同语言的作者合作撰写的非英语论文在内的系统评价将促进对补充和替代医学进行更彻底的科学评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of clinical trials on acupuncture in the Japanese literature

Objective: To evaluate and introduce the current status of acupuncture clinical trials in Japan.

Methods: We performed a database search of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in Japan, using ‘Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japana Centra Revuo Medicina) CD-ROM version (between 1987–2000)’ and an independent search. Parallel or crossover designed trials which assessed the efficacy of needle acupuncture were included.

Results: We located 32 published papers (24 full papers and eight abstracts), which reported 34 trials. Only two of these were listed in Medline or the Cochrane Library. Conditions examined were musculoskeletal pain (20 trials including 10 for low back pain and three for sciatica), neck and shoulder stiffness (four trials) and miscellaneous conditions (10 trials). Thirty-three trials were described as randomized, although seven trials employed a quasi-random method. Applying the 5-point Jadad quality assessment scoring system, the mean score was 1.85 ± 1.16 (SD). Eighteen (53%) of the reports were conducted to determine a more effective procedure of acupuncture, these compared a certain type of acupuncture with another type of acupuncture or specific additional points.

Conclusions: Japanese acupuncture CCTs, which are rarely listed in the Western databases, differ in several respects from Western reports. Systematic reviews including non-English papers with collaboration among authors representing different languages would promote more thorough scientific evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board A research agenda for the acupuncture community Treating hiccups with differential point prescription Influence of akupoints of principal meridians on a skeletal musculation of the person Body surface stimulation and rectal motility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1