阅读顺序检测的抽象论证

S. Ferilli, D. Grieco, Domenico Redavid, F. Esposito
{"title":"阅读顺序检测的抽象论证","authors":"S. Ferilli, D. Grieco, Domenico Redavid, F. Esposito","doi":"10.1145/2644866.2644883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting the reading order among the layout components of a document's page is fundamental to ensure effectiveness or even applicability of subsequent content extraction steps. While in single-column documents the reading flow can be straightforwardly determined, in more complex documents the task may become very hard. This paper proposes an automatic strategy for identifying the correct reading order of a document page's components based on abstract argumentation. The technique is unsupervised, and works on any kind of document based only on general assumptions about how humans behave when reading documents. Experimental results show that it is effective in more complex cases, and requires less background knowledge, than previous solutions that have been proposed in the literature.","PeriodicalId":91385,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"47 1","pages":"45-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract argumentation for reading order detection\",\"authors\":\"S. Ferilli, D. Grieco, Domenico Redavid, F. Esposito\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2644866.2644883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detecting the reading order among the layout components of a document's page is fundamental to ensure effectiveness or even applicability of subsequent content extraction steps. While in single-column documents the reading flow can be straightforwardly determined, in more complex documents the task may become very hard. This paper proposes an automatic strategy for identifying the correct reading order of a document page's components based on abstract argumentation. The technique is unsupervised, and works on any kind of document based only on general assumptions about how humans behave when reading documents. Experimental results show that it is effective in more complex cases, and requires less background knowledge, than previous solutions that have been proposed in the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"45-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2644866.2644883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

检测文档页面布局组件之间的阅读顺序是确保后续内容提取步骤的有效性甚至适用性的基础。在单列文档中,可以直接确定阅读流程,但在更复杂的文档中,这项任务可能会变得非常困难。本文提出了一种基于抽象论证的文档页面组件正确阅读顺序自动识别策略。该技术是无监督的,并且仅基于人类在阅读文档时的行为的一般假设来处理任何类型的文档。实验结果表明,与文献中提出的解决方案相比,该方法在更复杂的情况下是有效的,并且需要更少的背景知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract argumentation for reading order detection
Detecting the reading order among the layout components of a document's page is fundamental to ensure effectiveness or even applicability of subsequent content extraction steps. While in single-column documents the reading flow can be straightforwardly determined, in more complex documents the task may become very hard. This paper proposes an automatic strategy for identifying the correct reading order of a document page's components based on abstract argumentation. The technique is unsupervised, and works on any kind of document based only on general assumptions about how humans behave when reading documents. Experimental results show that it is effective in more complex cases, and requires less background knowledge, than previous solutions that have been proposed in the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Notarial Archives, Valletta: Starting from Zero Truncation: all the news that fits we'll print Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism An ensemble approach for text document clustering using Wikipedia concepts Document changes: modeling, detection, storage and visualization (DChanges 2014)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1