巴西标准规定的硬木组c40强度等级对木结构设计的刚度影响

F. Lahr, V. Aquino, F. Arroyo, H. Santos, S. A. M. Silva, A. R. V. Wolenski, Carlos Maviael de Carvalho, J. Almeida, A. Christoforo
{"title":"巴西标准规定的硬木组c40强度等级对木结构设计的刚度影响","authors":"F. Lahr, V. Aquino, F. Arroyo, H. Santos, S. A. M. Silva, A. R. V. Wolenski, Carlos Maviael de Carvalho, J. Almeida, A. Christoforo","doi":"10.37763/wr.1336-4561/66.4.582594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian standard ABNT 7190 (1997) establishes the strength classes C20, C30, C40 and C60 for the proper framework of the different wood types in the group of hardwoods. Associated with the strength class, which is based on the compressive strength characteristic value parallel to the fibers (fc0,k), the standard stipulates the respective values representing the stiffness (Ec0), with 19500 MPa being the reference value for the class C40, essential variables in structural design. For being the C40 class is the one with the greatest amplitude (20 MPa), it is possible that the value 19500 MPa is not the best representation of stiffness. This work aimed to verify the representativeness the stiffness value established by the Brazilian standard for C40 wood. The result obtained from the average confidence interval indicates the value of 14110 MPa as being the most representative, which may imply structures that are supposedly more rigid than they really are.","PeriodicalId":23619,"journal":{"name":"WOOD RESEARCH 66(4) 2021","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INFLUENCE OF STIFFNESS RELATED TO THE C40 STRENGTH CLASS OF THE HARDWOOD GROUP ESTABLISHED BY THE BRAZILIAN STANDARD IN THE DESIGN OF TIMBER STRUCTURES\",\"authors\":\"F. Lahr, V. Aquino, F. Arroyo, H. Santos, S. A. M. Silva, A. R. V. Wolenski, Carlos Maviael de Carvalho, J. Almeida, A. Christoforo\",\"doi\":\"10.37763/wr.1336-4561/66.4.582594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Brazilian standard ABNT 7190 (1997) establishes the strength classes C20, C30, C40 and C60 for the proper framework of the different wood types in the group of hardwoods. Associated with the strength class, which is based on the compressive strength characteristic value parallel to the fibers (fc0,k), the standard stipulates the respective values representing the stiffness (Ec0), with 19500 MPa being the reference value for the class C40, essential variables in structural design. For being the C40 class is the one with the greatest amplitude (20 MPa), it is possible that the value 19500 MPa is not the best representation of stiffness. This work aimed to verify the representativeness the stiffness value established by the Brazilian standard for C40 wood. The result obtained from the average confidence interval indicates the value of 14110 MPa as being the most representative, which may imply structures that are supposedly more rigid than they really are.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WOOD RESEARCH 66(4) 2021\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WOOD RESEARCH 66(4) 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37763/wr.1336-4561/66.4.582594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WOOD RESEARCH 66(4) 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37763/wr.1336-4561/66.4.582594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

巴西标准ABNT 7190(1997)为硬木组中不同木材类型的适当框架建立了C20、C30、C40和C60的强度等级。与强度等级相关的是,该标准以平行于纤维的抗压强度特征值(f0,k)为基础,规定了各自的值来表示刚度(Ec0),其中19500 MPa是C40等级的参考值,这是结构设计中的重要变量。由于C40级是振幅最大的一种(20 MPa),因此19500 MPa的值可能不是刚度的最佳代表。本工作旨在验证巴西C40木材标准建立的刚度值的代表性。从平均置信区间得到的结果表明,14110 MPa的值是最具代表性的,这可能意味着假设的结构比实际的刚性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INFLUENCE OF STIFFNESS RELATED TO THE C40 STRENGTH CLASS OF THE HARDWOOD GROUP ESTABLISHED BY THE BRAZILIAN STANDARD IN THE DESIGN OF TIMBER STRUCTURES
The Brazilian standard ABNT 7190 (1997) establishes the strength classes C20, C30, C40 and C60 for the proper framework of the different wood types in the group of hardwoods. Associated with the strength class, which is based on the compressive strength characteristic value parallel to the fibers (fc0,k), the standard stipulates the respective values representing the stiffness (Ec0), with 19500 MPa being the reference value for the class C40, essential variables in structural design. For being the C40 class is the one with the greatest amplitude (20 MPa), it is possible that the value 19500 MPa is not the best representation of stiffness. This work aimed to verify the representativeness the stiffness value established by the Brazilian standard for C40 wood. The result obtained from the average confidence interval indicates the value of 14110 MPa as being the most representative, which may imply structures that are supposedly more rigid than they really are.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COLOUR STABILITY OF STEAMED BLACK LOCUST EFFECTS OF STAND DENSITY ON TURPENTINE TERPENE COMPONENTS AND RESIN DUCT MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF PINUS MASSONIANA APPLICATION OF PHOTOMETRY IN DETERMINING THE DUST MASS CONCENTRATION OF HARDWOODS INFLUENCE OF ULTRA LOW AND HIGH TEMPERATURE ON ENZYMATIC PRETREATMENT OF BEECH BRANCHES WOOD EFFECTS OF HEAT TREATMENT ON SOME CHEMICAL COMPOUND AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BLACK PINE WOOD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1