经典计算机视觉与卷积神经网络在航空图像杂草映射中的比较

Paulo César Pereira Júnior, Alexandre Monteiro, Rafael Da Luz Ribeiro, A. Sobieranski, A. V. Wangenheim
{"title":"经典计算机视觉与卷积神经网络在航空图像杂草映射中的比较","authors":"Paulo César Pereira Júnior, Alexandre Monteiro, Rafael Da Luz Ribeiro, A. Sobieranski, A. V. Wangenheim","doi":"10.22456/2175-2745.97835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a comparison between convolutional neural networks and classical computer vision approaches, for the specific precision agriculture problem of weed mapping on sugarcane fields aerial images. A systematic literature review was conducted to find which computer vision methods are being used on this specific problem. The most cited methods were implemented, as well as four models of convolutional neural networks. All implemented approaches were tested using the same dataset, and their results were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The obtained results were compared to a human expert made ground truth, for validation. The results indicate that the convolutional neural networks present better precision and generalize better than the classical models.","PeriodicalId":82472,"journal":{"name":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Classical Computer Vision vs. Convolutional Neural Networks for Weed Mapping in Aerial Images\",\"authors\":\"Paulo César Pereira Júnior, Alexandre Monteiro, Rafael Da Luz Ribeiro, A. Sobieranski, A. V. Wangenheim\",\"doi\":\"10.22456/2175-2745.97835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a comparison between convolutional neural networks and classical computer vision approaches, for the specific precision agriculture problem of weed mapping on sugarcane fields aerial images. A systematic literature review was conducted to find which computer vision methods are being used on this specific problem. The most cited methods were implemented, as well as four models of convolutional neural networks. All implemented approaches were tested using the same dataset, and their results were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The obtained results were compared to a human expert made ground truth, for validation. The results indicate that the convolutional neural networks present better precision and generalize better than the classical models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.97835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research initiative, treatment action : RITA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.97835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了卷积神经网络和经典计算机视觉方法的比较,以甘蔗田航空图像杂草映射的具体精准农业问题。进行了系统的文献综述,以找出哪些计算机视觉方法正在用于这一具体问题。实现了引用最多的方法,以及四种卷积神经网络模型。所有实施的方法都使用相同的数据集进行测试,并对其结果进行定量和定性分析。所获得的结果与人类专家制作的地面事实进行了比较,以进行验证。结果表明,与经典模型相比,卷积神经网络具有更好的精度和泛化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Classical Computer Vision vs. Convolutional Neural Networks for Weed Mapping in Aerial Images
In this paper, we present a comparison between convolutional neural networks and classical computer vision approaches, for the specific precision agriculture problem of weed mapping on sugarcane fields aerial images. A systematic literature review was conducted to find which computer vision methods are being used on this specific problem. The most cited methods were implemented, as well as four models of convolutional neural networks. All implemented approaches were tested using the same dataset, and their results were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The obtained results were compared to a human expert made ground truth, for validation. The results indicate that the convolutional neural networks present better precision and generalize better than the classical models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Causal Effect Estimation of Emotional Labeling of Watched Videos Exploring Supervised Techniques for Automated Recognition of Intention Classes from Portuguese Free Texts on Agriculture Stochastic Models for Planning VLE Moodle Environments based on Containers and Virtual Machines A Review of Testbeds on SCADA Systems with Malware Analysis A Conceptual Model for Situating Purposes in Artificial Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1