社会权利的历史分歧与当代趋同

IF 7.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Issues and Policy Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401
Guo Zhonghua
{"title":"社会权利的历史分歧与当代趋同","authors":"Guo Zhonghua","doi":"10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.","PeriodicalId":47129,"journal":{"name":"Social Issues and Policy Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights\",\"authors\":\"Guo Zhonghua\",\"doi\":\"10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Issues and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Issues and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Issues and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会权利是公民权利的基本要素之一。社会权利的目的是保障人的生存权利。通过与政权、民族主义和资本主义的结合,社会权利在历史上呈现出不同的存在模式。19世纪下半叶,社会权利与民族主义和专制政权相结合后,呈现出一种专制主义的形态,即社会权利既具有改善人民生活的功能,又具有促进专制政权合法性的功能。自由资本主义社会权利模式是社会权利与资本主义紧密结合的产物,是资本主义扭曲自身价值服务于资本主义发展的产物。福利国家模式是社会权利与资本主义的对抗结合,社会权利得到政权的保护,并与资本主义建立了“战争关系”。20世纪后期,全球化、后民族国家和后工业化的趋势推动社会权利进入趋同的发展轨道,吉登斯积极的福利思想体现了这一趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights
Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The mission of Social Issues and Policy Review (SIPR) is to provide state of the art and timely theoretical and empirical reviews of topics and programs of research that are directly relevant to understanding and addressing social issues and public policy.Papers will be accessible and relevant to a broad audience and will normally be based on a program of research. Works in SIPR will represent perspectives directly relevant to the psychological study of social issues and public policy. Contributions are expected to be review papers that present a strong scholarly foundation and consider how research and theory can inform social issues and policy or articulate the implication of social issues and public policy for theory and research.
期刊最新文献
A human rights‐based approach to climates injustices at the local, national, and international levels: Program and policy recommendations The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective Omission as a modern form of bias against Native Peoples: Implications for policies and practices Psychological science and its societal mission during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: The Motivation Barometer as an evidence‐informed policy instrument in Belgium The role of suspect development practices in eyewitness identification accuracy and racial disparities in wrongful conviction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1