{"title":"社会权利的历史分歧与当代趋同","authors":"Guo Zhonghua","doi":"10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.","PeriodicalId":47129,"journal":{"name":"Social Issues and Policy Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights\",\"authors\":\"Guo Zhonghua\",\"doi\":\"10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Issues and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Issues and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Issues and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPSPRWSP2515-471001.20200401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Historical Divergences and Contemporary Convergence of Social Rights
Social right is one of the basic elements of citizenship rights. The aim of the social right is to guarantee people’s survival rights. Through the combinaIII tion with regime, nationalism and capitalism, social right exhibits different existIII ing models in history. In the second half of 19th century, after social right comIII bined with nationalism and authoritarian regime it exhibited an authoritarian modIII el in which social rights performed both functions of improving people’s life and promoting legitimacy of the authoritarian regime. Liberal capitalism model of soIII cial right was the production of the adhering combination between social right and capitalism in which the former distorted its own value to serve the latter’s develIII opment. And welfare state model was the antagonisticcombination between social right and capitalism in which social right got the regime’s protection and set itself in a ’warlike relationship with the capitalism. In the late 20 century, the trends of globalization, post-nation state and post-industrialisation drove the social right into a convergent development orbit which reflected by Anthony Giddens posiIII tive welfare thought.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Social Issues and Policy Review (SIPR) is to provide state of the art and timely theoretical and empirical reviews of topics and programs of research that are directly relevant to understanding and addressing social issues and public policy.Papers will be accessible and relevant to a broad audience and will normally be based on a program of research. Works in SIPR will represent perspectives directly relevant to the psychological study of social issues and public policy. Contributions are expected to be review papers that present a strong scholarly foundation and consider how research and theory can inform social issues and policy or articulate the implication of social issues and public policy for theory and research.