腹壁下穿支皮瓣用于乳房重建术:术中鞘内吗啡对预后的影响

M. Aziz, K. Halenarova, E. Schröder, V. Kamps, M. Paesmans, M. Khalife, F. Urbain, M. Sosnowski
{"title":"腹壁下穿支皮瓣用于乳房重建术:术中鞘内吗啡对预后的影响","authors":"M. Aziz, K. Halenarova, E. Schröder, V. Kamps, M. Paesmans, M. Khalife, F. Urbain, M. Sosnowski","doi":"10.11131/2018/101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain control after breast reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) often requires intravenous narcotic analgesia and inpatient hospitalization. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) administration analgesia is increasing in popularity because it decreases the use of intravenous analgesic medications and offer comparable pain relief with less systemic side effects. \nQuestions/purposes: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of intrathecal morphine on postoperative morbidity of breast reconstruction by Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap and compare it with intravenous narcotic analgesia. Methods: 269 patients underwent immediate or delayed DIEP reconstruction after mastectomy, by the same surgeon, at Jules Bordet Institute. Patients receiving ITM analgesia (300 μ) were matched 1:3 with patients undergoing intravenous narcotic analgesia for pain control in the same years by the same surgeon. Differences in peri- and postoperative complications across the two groups were assessed. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and factors of morbidity. Intraoperative variables were not statistically different between the groups except for intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0001), transfusion (P = 0.0001) and Intraoperative liquid requirement (p = 0.0001). Intra and postoperative blood pressure were lower in ITM group (p < 0.05). Patients in ITM group showed lower postoperative analgesia requirement (P < 0,0001), less respiratory complications and less acute respiratory failure (P = 0,003 and P = 0,004, respectively). No statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) were noted \nConclusion: We found that intrathecal morphine analgesia was associated with less blood loss and fluid administration, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications with an acceptable security profile than intravenous narcotic analgesia. Clinical relevance: \nThis study suggests that using intrathecal morphine may result in less blood loss and blood transfusion, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications.","PeriodicalId":19674,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap (D.I.E.P) for Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Intraoperative Intrathecal Morphine on Outcome\",\"authors\":\"M. Aziz, K. Halenarova, E. Schröder, V. Kamps, M. Paesmans, M. Khalife, F. Urbain, M. Sosnowski\",\"doi\":\"10.11131/2018/101325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pain control after breast reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) often requires intravenous narcotic analgesia and inpatient hospitalization. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) administration analgesia is increasing in popularity because it decreases the use of intravenous analgesic medications and offer comparable pain relief with less systemic side effects. \\nQuestions/purposes: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of intrathecal morphine on postoperative morbidity of breast reconstruction by Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap and compare it with intravenous narcotic analgesia. Methods: 269 patients underwent immediate or delayed DIEP reconstruction after mastectomy, by the same surgeon, at Jules Bordet Institute. Patients receiving ITM analgesia (300 μ) were matched 1:3 with patients undergoing intravenous narcotic analgesia for pain control in the same years by the same surgeon. Differences in peri- and postoperative complications across the two groups were assessed. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and factors of morbidity. Intraoperative variables were not statistically different between the groups except for intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0001), transfusion (P = 0.0001) and Intraoperative liquid requirement (p = 0.0001). Intra and postoperative blood pressure were lower in ITM group (p < 0.05). Patients in ITM group showed lower postoperative analgesia requirement (P < 0,0001), less respiratory complications and less acute respiratory failure (P = 0,003 and P = 0,004, respectively). No statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) were noted \\nConclusion: We found that intrathecal morphine analgesia was associated with less blood loss and fluid administration, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications with an acceptable security profile than intravenous narcotic analgesia. Clinical relevance: \\nThis study suggests that using intrathecal morphine may result in less blood loss and blood transfusion, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11131/2018/101325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11131/2018/101325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹部下深穿支(DIEP)乳房再造术后的疼痛控制通常需要静脉麻醉镇痛和住院治疗。鞘内注射吗啡(ITM)镇痛越来越受欢迎,因为它减少了静脉注射镇痛药物的使用,并提供了相当的疼痛缓解和更小的全身副作用。问题/目的:本回顾性研究的目的是评价鞘内吗啡对腹下深穿支皮瓣乳房再造术术后发病率的影响,并与静脉麻醉镇痛进行比较。方法:269例患者在乳房切除术后立即或延迟DIEP重建,由同一位外科医生,朱尔斯博尔特研究所。采用ITM (300 μ)镇痛的患者与同一位外科医生同年采用静脉麻醉镇痛的患者以1:3的比例进行对照。评估两组患者围手术期和术后并发症的差异。结果:两组在人口学特征和发病因素方面具有可比性。除术中出血量(P = 0.0001)、输血量(P = 0.0001)和术中需水量(P = 0.0001)外,各组间术中变量差异无统计学意义。ITM组术中、术后血压均低于对照组(p < 0.05)。ITM组患者术后镇痛需求较低(P < 0.0001),呼吸并发症较少,急性呼吸衰竭较少(P = 0.003, P = 0.004)。结论:我们发现鞘内吗啡镇痛与静脉麻醉镇痛相比,出血量和给液量更少,术后疼痛控制更好,呼吸并发症更少,安全性可接受。临床意义:本研究提示鞘内使用吗啡可减少失血量和输血,更好地控制术后疼痛,减少呼吸并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap (D.I.E.P) for Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Intraoperative Intrathecal Morphine on Outcome
Background: Pain control after breast reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) often requires intravenous narcotic analgesia and inpatient hospitalization. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) administration analgesia is increasing in popularity because it decreases the use of intravenous analgesic medications and offer comparable pain relief with less systemic side effects. Questions/purposes: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of intrathecal morphine on postoperative morbidity of breast reconstruction by Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap and compare it with intravenous narcotic analgesia. Methods: 269 patients underwent immediate or delayed DIEP reconstruction after mastectomy, by the same surgeon, at Jules Bordet Institute. Patients receiving ITM analgesia (300 μ) were matched 1:3 with patients undergoing intravenous narcotic analgesia for pain control in the same years by the same surgeon. Differences in peri- and postoperative complications across the two groups were assessed. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and factors of morbidity. Intraoperative variables were not statistically different between the groups except for intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.0001), transfusion (P = 0.0001) and Intraoperative liquid requirement (p = 0.0001). Intra and postoperative blood pressure were lower in ITM group (p < 0.05). Patients in ITM group showed lower postoperative analgesia requirement (P < 0,0001), less respiratory complications and less acute respiratory failure (P = 0,003 and P = 0,004, respectively). No statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) were noted Conclusion: We found that intrathecal morphine analgesia was associated with less blood loss and fluid administration, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications with an acceptable security profile than intravenous narcotic analgesia. Clinical relevance: This study suggests that using intrathecal morphine may result in less blood loss and blood transfusion, better postoperative pain control, and less respiratory complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Master block pattern development for fit evaluation based on adult female anthropometric data and body shapes using Telestia-AB patternmaking system Development of a generic timetabling and scheduling system based on the combinations of metaheuristics algorithm Analisis kerangka kerja yang logis untuk menyusun sop penanganan pertama pada cctv Pengaruh Penambahan Ragi NKL dan Waktu Fermentasi terhadap Populasi Mikroorganisme selama Fermentasi Biji Kakao Experimental investigation of heat treated alloy for hardness using multiple linear regression model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1