{"title":"30-15国际体能测试中使用的长度(40米vs 28米)是否影响不同运动项目的u18球员达到的最大跑步速度?","authors":"J. L. Hernández-Davó","doi":"10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The maximal running speed (MRS) achieved in the 30-15 International Fitness Test (30-15IFT) is widely used to prescribe high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The 30-15IFT can be performed in either 40- (30-15IFT-40) or 28-meters (30-15IFT-28) length. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the MRS achieved in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28. Methods: Fifty U-18 players from different sports (handball: n=19, soccer: n=19, tennis n=12) attended two testing sessions. Results: MRS did not differ between the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28 in either handball or soccer players. However, tennis players showed significantly greater MRS values in the 30-15IFT-28 than in the 30-15IFT-40 (20.80±1.87 vs 20.05±2.09 km·h-1; p = 0.030; ES = 0.38). In addition, tennis player showed significant greater MRS in the 30-15IFT-28 (20.80±1.87 km·h-1) than both handball (18.58±1.13 km·h-1; p < 0.001; ES = 1.53) and soccer players (18.74±0.93 km·h-1; p = 0.001; ES = 1.47). Conclusions: The different MRS values in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28, entail significant practical implications for HIIT prescription in tennis players.","PeriodicalId":36150,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Movement","volume":"65 1","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the length used in the 30-15 International Fitness Test (40- vs 28-m) influence the maximal running speed achieved by under-18 players from different sports?\",\"authors\":\"J. L. Hernández-Davó\",\"doi\":\"10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The maximal running speed (MRS) achieved in the 30-15 International Fitness Test (30-15IFT) is widely used to prescribe high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The 30-15IFT can be performed in either 40- (30-15IFT-40) or 28-meters (30-15IFT-28) length. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the MRS achieved in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28. Methods: Fifty U-18 players from different sports (handball: n=19, soccer: n=19, tennis n=12) attended two testing sessions. Results: MRS did not differ between the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28 in either handball or soccer players. However, tennis players showed significantly greater MRS values in the 30-15IFT-28 than in the 30-15IFT-40 (20.80±1.87 vs 20.05±2.09 km·h-1; p = 0.030; ES = 0.38). In addition, tennis player showed significant greater MRS in the 30-15IFT-28 (20.80±1.87 km·h-1) than both handball (18.58±1.13 km·h-1; p < 0.001; ES = 1.53) and soccer players (18.74±0.93 km·h-1; p = 0.001; ES = 1.47). Conclusions: The different MRS values in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28, entail significant practical implications for HIIT prescription in tennis players.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Human Movement\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"77-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Human Movement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the length used in the 30-15 International Fitness Test (40- vs 28-m) influence the maximal running speed achieved by under-18 players from different sports?
The maximal running speed (MRS) achieved in the 30-15 International Fitness Test (30-15IFT) is widely used to prescribe high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The 30-15IFT can be performed in either 40- (30-15IFT-40) or 28-meters (30-15IFT-28) length. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the MRS achieved in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28. Methods: Fifty U-18 players from different sports (handball: n=19, soccer: n=19, tennis n=12) attended two testing sessions. Results: MRS did not differ between the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28 in either handball or soccer players. However, tennis players showed significantly greater MRS values in the 30-15IFT-28 than in the 30-15IFT-40 (20.80±1.87 vs 20.05±2.09 km·h-1; p = 0.030; ES = 0.38). In addition, tennis player showed significant greater MRS in the 30-15IFT-28 (20.80±1.87 km·h-1) than both handball (18.58±1.13 km·h-1; p < 0.001; ES = 1.53) and soccer players (18.74±0.93 km·h-1; p = 0.001; ES = 1.47). Conclusions: The different MRS values in the 30-15IFT-40 and the 30-15IFT-28, entail significant practical implications for HIIT prescription in tennis players.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
