“积少成多”——角色转换的话语、恢复的行为和表演中的激进

G. Boland
{"title":"“积少成多”——角色转换的话语、恢复的行为和表演中的激进","authors":"G. Boland","doi":"10.1080/14452294.2018.1482729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dorothy Heathcote’s perspectives concerning ‘role-shifted discourse’ within what she latterly called ‘Model 1: Drama used to explore people’ exhibits a strong alignment with the didactic purposes of ‘living history’ performances at heritage sites such as Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia. Kershaw’s ‘points of process’ concerning the ‘radical in performance’ are introduced as a proposition for analysing and reconceptualising both the character of ‘living history’ performances and the fundamentally radical nature of Dorothy Heathcote’s pioneering innovations for drama-based learning and teaching. This line of ‘theoretical/conceptual’ inquiry offers new propositions about intersections between Dorothy Heathcote’s insights concerning role performance within ‘the drama frame’ and Schechner’s perspectives concerning the dramatic tensions that reside within what Turner identified as ‘liminoid’, threshold-crossing experiences for participant/observers of ‘living history’ performances at museums and heritage sites.","PeriodicalId":41180,"journal":{"name":"NJ-Drama Australia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Many Mickles Make a Muckle’ – Role-Shifted Discourse, Restored Behaviour and the Radical in Performance\",\"authors\":\"G. Boland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14452294.2018.1482729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Dorothy Heathcote’s perspectives concerning ‘role-shifted discourse’ within what she latterly called ‘Model 1: Drama used to explore people’ exhibits a strong alignment with the didactic purposes of ‘living history’ performances at heritage sites such as Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia. Kershaw’s ‘points of process’ concerning the ‘radical in performance’ are introduced as a proposition for analysing and reconceptualising both the character of ‘living history’ performances and the fundamentally radical nature of Dorothy Heathcote’s pioneering innovations for drama-based learning and teaching. This line of ‘theoretical/conceptual’ inquiry offers new propositions about intersections between Dorothy Heathcote’s insights concerning role performance within ‘the drama frame’ and Schechner’s perspectives concerning the dramatic tensions that reside within what Turner identified as ‘liminoid’, threshold-crossing experiences for participant/observers of ‘living history’ performances at museums and heritage sites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NJ-Drama Australia Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NJ-Drama Australia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2018.1482729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJ-Drama Australia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2018.1482729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多萝西·希思科特(Dorothy Heathcote)关于“角色转换话语”的观点,在她最近所谓的“模型1:用于探索人类的戏剧”中,与弗吉尼亚州威廉斯堡殖民地等遗产遗址的“生活史”表演的教学目的有很强的一致性。克肖关于“表演中的激进”的“过程点”作为一个命题被引入,用于分析和重新定义“生活史”表演的特征和多萝西·希思科特对戏剧学习和教学的开创性创新的根本激进性质。这条“理论/概念”的探究线提供了关于Dorothy Heathcote关于“戏剧框架”中的角色表演的见解和Schechner关于戏剧紧张关系的观点之间的交叉点的新命题,这些戏剧紧张关系存在于Turner所确定的“阈限”中,这是博物馆和遗产遗址中“活历史”表演的参与者/观察者的门槛体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Many Mickles Make a Muckle’ – Role-Shifted Discourse, Restored Behaviour and the Radical in Performance
ABSTRACT Dorothy Heathcote’s perspectives concerning ‘role-shifted discourse’ within what she latterly called ‘Model 1: Drama used to explore people’ exhibits a strong alignment with the didactic purposes of ‘living history’ performances at heritage sites such as Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia. Kershaw’s ‘points of process’ concerning the ‘radical in performance’ are introduced as a proposition for analysing and reconceptualising both the character of ‘living history’ performances and the fundamentally radical nature of Dorothy Heathcote’s pioneering innovations for drama-based learning and teaching. This line of ‘theoretical/conceptual’ inquiry offers new propositions about intersections between Dorothy Heathcote’s insights concerning role performance within ‘the drama frame’ and Schechner’s perspectives concerning the dramatic tensions that reside within what Turner identified as ‘liminoid’, threshold-crossing experiences for participant/observers of ‘living history’ performances at museums and heritage sites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
The potential of Zoom technology for enabling creativity in the drama classroom through peer-assisted learning and group collaboration in pre service teacher education A voice for community during unsettling times Dramatic shifts in learning: a case study analysis of student literacy learning through drama School Drama: Using drama for oracy in an EAL/D classroom ‘It’s got to be a journey’: learning to teach First Nations content and concepts in the Australian drama classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1