M. Franchini md, L. Cianferoni md, A. Appicciafuoco md, A. R. Marseglia md
{"title":"妇科内窥镜的消毒和灭菌:问题和成本","authors":"M. Franchini md, L. Cianferoni md, A. Appicciafuoco md, A. R. Marseglia md","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo determine and compare the total costs of two low-temperature sterilization systems. \n \nDesign \nThe direct and indirect costs of ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization were recorded over a 6-month period. Break-even point analysis was performed to establish when the use of the gas plasma system represented a cost saving. \n \nResults \nHydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization represented a cost saving after 95 units of sterilization. \n \nConclusions \nGas plasma sterilization was shown to be a valid method in hospital procedures with respect to both economy and quality.","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"6 6","pages":"359-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disinfection and sterilization in gynaecological endoscopy: problems and costs\",\"authors\":\"M. Franchini md, L. Cianferoni md, A. Appicciafuoco md, A. R. Marseglia md\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo determine and compare the total costs of two low-temperature sterilization systems. \\n \\nDesign \\nThe direct and indirect costs of ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization were recorded over a 6-month period. Break-even point analysis was performed to establish when the use of the gas plasma system represented a cost saving. \\n \\nResults \\nHydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization represented a cost saving after 95 units of sterilization. \\n \\nConclusions \\nGas plasma sterilization was shown to be a valid method in hospital procedures with respect to both economy and quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"359-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disinfection and sterilization in gynaecological endoscopy: problems and costs
Objective
To determine and compare the total costs of two low-temperature sterilization systems.
Design
The direct and indirect costs of ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization were recorded over a 6-month period. Break-even point analysis was performed to establish when the use of the gas plasma system represented a cost saving.
Results
Hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization represented a cost saving after 95 units of sterilization.
Conclusions
Gas plasma sterilization was shown to be a valid method in hospital procedures with respect to both economy and quality.