{"title":"黑肩孔雀的分类学历史研究在达尔文的帮助下从物种降级为变异","authors":"Hein van Grouw, W. Dekkers","doi":"10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. In the 19th century the black-shouldered variety of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus was erroneously viewed by many as a separate species, named P. nigripennis. Others had doubts about its taxonomic status, but Darwin presented firm evidence for it being a variety under domestication, which treatment is now well established and accepted. It being a colour variation rather than a wild species was important for Darwin to prove, as otherwise it could undermine his theory of slow modification by natural selection in the wild. ‘I cannot consider it a domesticated variety, because the differences in both sexes appear to be constant, and to descend to the progeny’ (Sclater 1860: 222). ‘The black-shouldered peacock is a variety, the case is the most remarkable ever recorded of the abrupt appearance of a new form, which so closely resembles a true species that it has deceived one of the most experienced of living ornithologists’ (Darwin 1868: 292).","PeriodicalId":38973,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","volume":"39 1","pages":"111 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The taxonomic history of Black-shouldered Peafowl; with Darwin's help downgraded from species to variation\",\"authors\":\"Hein van Grouw, W. Dekkers\",\"doi\":\"10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary. In the 19th century the black-shouldered variety of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus was erroneously viewed by many as a separate species, named P. nigripennis. Others had doubts about its taxonomic status, but Darwin presented firm evidence for it being a variety under domestication, which treatment is now well established and accepted. It being a colour variation rather than a wild species was important for Darwin to prove, as otherwise it could undermine his theory of slow modification by natural selection in the wild. ‘I cannot consider it a domesticated variety, because the differences in both sexes appear to be constant, and to descend to the progeny’ (Sclater 1860: 222). ‘The black-shouldered peacock is a variety, the case is the most remarkable ever recorded of the abrupt appearance of a new form, which so closely resembles a true species that it has deceived one of the most experienced of living ornithologists’ (Darwin 1868: 292).\",\"PeriodicalId\":38973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The taxonomic history of Black-shouldered Peafowl; with Darwin's help downgraded from species to variation
Summary. In the 19th century the black-shouldered variety of Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus was erroneously viewed by many as a separate species, named P. nigripennis. Others had doubts about its taxonomic status, but Darwin presented firm evidence for it being a variety under domestication, which treatment is now well established and accepted. It being a colour variation rather than a wild species was important for Darwin to prove, as otherwise it could undermine his theory of slow modification by natural selection in the wild. ‘I cannot consider it a domesticated variety, because the differences in both sexes appear to be constant, and to descend to the progeny’ (Sclater 1860: 222). ‘The black-shouldered peacock is a variety, the case is the most remarkable ever recorded of the abrupt appearance of a new form, which so closely resembles a true species that it has deceived one of the most experienced of living ornithologists’ (Darwin 1868: 292).