软商品的未来-战争时期(贸易战)(幻灯片)

Ali Muhammad Lakdawala
{"title":"软商品的未来-战争时期(贸易战)(幻灯片)","authors":"Ali Muhammad Lakdawala","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3631697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Future of Soft Commodities - During the time of WAR (TRADE War)” the paper title mentioned cannot have simple and definitive answer.<br><br>Reason being the world is too varied , too complex, for that to be possible. However, its not hard to recognise the sharp differences in ability to identify the more prominent and influential actors.<br> <br>One must understand purpose of the war is to degrade the enemy's will and economic capacity. It may sound surprising but destruction through a market attack can be more effective than taking out enemy's ship, aircraft, deploying chemical weapons, etc when it comes to disabling an opponent.<br> <br>During 2015-16 “Currency/Financial” war was evident as boundaryless warfare with China devaluating its currency.<br><br>Post which there has been major change in global market dynamics, in fact WAR has only got more intensified with change in leadership across world. The new course opted is \"TRADE WAR\" wherein most countries has started to deploy it's only TRUMP CARD of \"TARIFFS\" and leading the pack / more prominent actor in forefront is US of A.<br><br>Such war can clamp down countries or even global banking system: When Banking stops, Credit stops, and when Credit stops, Trade stops and when Trade stops, ECONOMY CRUMBLES.<br><br>Economist John Maynard Keynes stated \"When the facts change, I change my mind“<br><br>Adhering with Mr. Keynes statement looks like we need not change our battlefield as WAR is ON just that now it is more open &amp; intense with many players joining the bandwagon<br><br>Hence,<br><br>\"Are Commodities getting politicised than staying course with its fundamentals???“<br><br>\"What challenges &amp; opportunities does it get along???\"","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future of Soft Commodities – During the Time of War (Trade War) (Presentation Slides)\",\"authors\":\"Ali Muhammad Lakdawala\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3631697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Future of Soft Commodities - During the time of WAR (TRADE War)” the paper title mentioned cannot have simple and definitive answer.<br><br>Reason being the world is too varied , too complex, for that to be possible. However, its not hard to recognise the sharp differences in ability to identify the more prominent and influential actors.<br> <br>One must understand purpose of the war is to degrade the enemy's will and economic capacity. It may sound surprising but destruction through a market attack can be more effective than taking out enemy's ship, aircraft, deploying chemical weapons, etc when it comes to disabling an opponent.<br> <br>During 2015-16 “Currency/Financial” war was evident as boundaryless warfare with China devaluating its currency.<br><br>Post which there has been major change in global market dynamics, in fact WAR has only got more intensified with change in leadership across world. The new course opted is \\\"TRADE WAR\\\" wherein most countries has started to deploy it's only TRUMP CARD of \\\"TARIFFS\\\" and leading the pack / more prominent actor in forefront is US of A.<br><br>Such war can clamp down countries or even global banking system: When Banking stops, Credit stops, and when Credit stops, Trade stops and when Trade stops, ECONOMY CRUMBLES.<br><br>Economist John Maynard Keynes stated \\\"When the facts change, I change my mind“<br><br>Adhering with Mr. Keynes statement looks like we need not change our battlefield as WAR is ON just that now it is more open &amp; intense with many players joining the bandwagon<br><br>Hence,<br><br>\\\"Are Commodities getting politicised than staying course with its fundamentals???“<br><br>\\\"What challenges &amp; opportunities does it get along???\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":12584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“软商品的未来-在战争时期(贸易战)”的论文标题提到不能有一个简单和明确的答案。作为世界的理性太过多变,太过复杂,这是不可能的。然而,不难认识到,在识别更突出和更有影响力的行为者的能力上存在巨大差异。人们必须明白,战争的目的是削弱敌人的意志和经济能力。这听起来可能令人惊讶,但通过市场攻击进行破坏可能比摧毁敌人的船只、飞机、部署化学武器等更有效。在2015-16年期间,“货币/金融”战争明显是与中国贬值其货币的无边界战争。全球市场动态发生了重大变化,事实上,随着世界各国领导人的更迭,战争只会变得更加激烈。选择的新路线是“贸易战”,大多数国家已经开始部署“关税”这张唯一的王牌,首当其冲的是美国。这样的战争可以压制国家甚至全球银行体系:当银行停止时,信贷停止,当信贷停止时,贸易停止,当贸易停止时,经济崩溃。经济学家约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯说过:“当事实改变时,我就会改变我的想法。”坚持凯恩斯先生的说法,看起来我们不需要改变我们的战场,因为战争已经开始,只是现在它更开放了。因此,“大宗商品是否变得政治化了,而不是保持基本面不变?”“有什么挑战?”机会,它相处得好吗?”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future of Soft Commodities – During the Time of War (Trade War) (Presentation Slides)
"Future of Soft Commodities - During the time of WAR (TRADE War)” the paper title mentioned cannot have simple and definitive answer.

Reason being the world is too varied , too complex, for that to be possible. However, its not hard to recognise the sharp differences in ability to identify the more prominent and influential actors.

One must understand purpose of the war is to degrade the enemy's will and economic capacity. It may sound surprising but destruction through a market attack can be more effective than taking out enemy's ship, aircraft, deploying chemical weapons, etc when it comes to disabling an opponent.

During 2015-16 “Currency/Financial” war was evident as boundaryless warfare with China devaluating its currency.

Post which there has been major change in global market dynamics, in fact WAR has only got more intensified with change in leadership across world. The new course opted is "TRADE WAR" wherein most countries has started to deploy it's only TRUMP CARD of "TARIFFS" and leading the pack / more prominent actor in forefront is US of A.

Such war can clamp down countries or even global banking system: When Banking stops, Credit stops, and when Credit stops, Trade stops and when Trade stops, ECONOMY CRUMBLES.

Economist John Maynard Keynes stated "When the facts change, I change my mind“

Adhering with Mr. Keynes statement looks like we need not change our battlefield as WAR is ON just that now it is more open & intense with many players joining the bandwagon

Hence,

"Are Commodities getting politicised than staying course with its fundamentals???“

"What challenges & opportunities does it get along???"
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manufacturer Encroachment in a Product Market and Common Ownership between Supply Chain Parties WTO आणि ग्रामीण विकासात कृषी (Agriculture in the WTO and Rural Development) Mechanics of Global Value Chains: India's Perspective A Block-Chain of Things (BcoT) Based System for Detecting Counterfeit Products in Supply Chain Management Are commodity futures a hedge against inflation? A Markov-switching approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1