一种基于贪婪的条件/决策覆盖测试准则修正方法

Bo-His Li, Chin-Yu Huang
{"title":"一种基于贪婪的条件/决策覆盖测试准则修正方法","authors":"Bo-His Li, Chin-Yu Huang","doi":"10.1109/SRDS.2017.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During software regression testing, the code coverage of target program is a crucial factor while we perform test case reduction and prioritization. Modified Condition/ Decision Coverage (MC/DC) is one of the most strict and high-accuracy criterion in code coverage and it is usually considered necessary for adequate testing of critical software. In the past, Hayhurst et al proposed a method to implement the MC/DC criterion that complies with regulatory guidance for DO-178B level A software. Hayhurst's MC/DC approach was to find some test cases which are satisfied by MC/DC criterion for each operator (and, or, not, or xor) in the Boolean expression. However, there could be some problems when using Hayhurst's MC/DC approach to select test cases. In this paper, we discuss how to improve and/or enhance Hayhurst's MC/DC approach by using a greedy-based method. Some experiments are performed based on real programs to evaluate as well as compare the performance of our proposed and Hayhurst's approaches.","PeriodicalId":6475,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Greedy-Based Method for Modified Condition/Decision Coverage Testing Criterion\",\"authors\":\"Bo-His Li, Chin-Yu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SRDS.2017.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During software regression testing, the code coverage of target program is a crucial factor while we perform test case reduction and prioritization. Modified Condition/ Decision Coverage (MC/DC) is one of the most strict and high-accuracy criterion in code coverage and it is usually considered necessary for adequate testing of critical software. In the past, Hayhurst et al proposed a method to implement the MC/DC criterion that complies with regulatory guidance for DO-178B level A software. Hayhurst's MC/DC approach was to find some test cases which are satisfied by MC/DC criterion for each operator (and, or, not, or xor) in the Boolean expression. However, there could be some problems when using Hayhurst's MC/DC approach to select test cases. In this paper, we discuss how to improve and/or enhance Hayhurst's MC/DC approach by using a greedy-based method. Some experiments are performed based on real programs to evaluate as well as compare the performance of our proposed and Hayhurst's approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2017.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS.2017.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在软件回归测试期间,当我们执行测试用例减少和优先级排序时,目标程序的代码覆盖率是一个至关重要的因素。修改条件/决策覆盖率(MC/DC)是代码覆盖率中最严格、精度最高的标准之一,通常被认为是对关键软件进行充分测试的必要条件。过去,Hayhurst等人针对DO-178B a级软件提出了一种符合法规指导的MC/DC标准的实现方法。Hayhurst的MC/DC方法是为布尔表达式中的每个操作符(and, or, not, or xor)找到一些满足MC/DC标准的测试用例。然而,当使用Hayhurst的MC/DC方法来选择测试用例时,可能会有一些问题。在本文中,我们讨论了如何通过使用基于贪婪的方法来改进和/或增强Hayhurst的MC/DC方法。基于实际程序进行了一些实验,以评估和比较我们提出的方法和Hayhurst方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Greedy-Based Method for Modified Condition/Decision Coverage Testing Criterion
During software regression testing, the code coverage of target program is a crucial factor while we perform test case reduction and prioritization. Modified Condition/ Decision Coverage (MC/DC) is one of the most strict and high-accuracy criterion in code coverage and it is usually considered necessary for adequate testing of critical software. In the past, Hayhurst et al proposed a method to implement the MC/DC criterion that complies with regulatory guidance for DO-178B level A software. Hayhurst's MC/DC approach was to find some test cases which are satisfied by MC/DC criterion for each operator (and, or, not, or xor) in the Boolean expression. However, there could be some problems when using Hayhurst's MC/DC approach to select test cases. In this paper, we discuss how to improve and/or enhance Hayhurst's MC/DC approach by using a greedy-based method. Some experiments are performed based on real programs to evaluate as well as compare the performance of our proposed and Hayhurst's approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PULP: Achieving Privacy and Utility Trade-Off in User Mobility Data On Availability for Blockchain-Based Systems Runtime Measurement Architecture for Bytecode Integrity in JVM-Based Cloud Performance Modeling of PBFT Consensus Process for Permissioned Blockchain Network (Hyperledger Fabric) CausalSpartan: Causal Consistency for Distributed Data Stores Using Hybrid Logical Clocks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1