1981-2019年“创业成功”研究的文献计量学分析

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Scientometric Research Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.5530/jscires.11.2.23
T. Le, Hiep-Hung Pham, Van Binh Tran
{"title":"1981-2019年“创业成功”研究的文献计量学分析","authors":"T. Le, Hiep-Hung Pham, Van Binh Tran","doi":"10.5530/jscires.11.2.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being received increasing attention from academic scholars, there have yet any review study on the topic of start-up success. This work fulfills this research gap by investigating 1554 start-up success documents collected from Scopus dataset between 1981 and 2019. Using bibliometric analysis, we reveal that the topic of start-up success only receives more attention from academic scholars since 2011 onwards. Regarding geographical distribution, the US, Germany, and the UK are the three countries contributing the highest number of start-up success related documents. Besides, it’s revealed that 305 (or 19.6%) start-up success documents were published in the top 20 journals. The co-author analysis found that the research groups of start-up success are still small and dispersed and there was a lack of continuity in the research. The science mapping identified six main topics of start-up success, including: (1) Business in General, (2) Start-up Ecosystem, (iii) Academic Start-up, (iv) Drivers of Start-up Success, (v) Resources for start-up, and (vi) Start-up Model. The study’s findings provide implications for stakeholders, academic","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on ‘Start-up Success’ Covering the Period 1981-2019\",\"authors\":\"T. Le, Hiep-Hung Pham, Van Binh Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/jscires.11.2.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite being received increasing attention from academic scholars, there have yet any review study on the topic of start-up success. This work fulfills this research gap by investigating 1554 start-up success documents collected from Scopus dataset between 1981 and 2019. Using bibliometric analysis, we reveal that the topic of start-up success only receives more attention from academic scholars since 2011 onwards. Regarding geographical distribution, the US, Germany, and the UK are the three countries contributing the highest number of start-up success related documents. Besides, it’s revealed that 305 (or 19.6%) start-up success documents were published in the top 20 journals. The co-author analysis found that the research groups of start-up success are still small and dispersed and there was a lack of continuity in the research. The science mapping identified six main topics of start-up success, including: (1) Business in General, (2) Start-up Ecosystem, (iii) Academic Start-up, (iv) Drivers of Start-up Success, (v) Resources for start-up, and (vi) Start-up Model. The study’s findings provide implications for stakeholders, academic\",\"PeriodicalId\":43282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientometric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越受到学术学者的关注,但目前还没有关于创业成功的综述性研究。本研究通过调查1981年至2019年从Scopus数据集中收集的1554份创业成功文件,填补了这一研究空白。通过文献计量分析,我们发现自2011年以来,创业成功的话题才受到学术学者的更多关注。在地理分布方面,美国、德国和英国是提供创业成功相关文件最多的三个国家。此外,在排名前20的期刊上发表了305篇创业成功论文,占19.6%。共同作者的分析发现,创业成功的研究群体仍然很小,而且分散,研究缺乏连续性。科学地图确定了创业成功的六个主要主题,包括:(1)一般商业,(2)创业生态系统,(iii)学术创业,(iv)创业成功的驱动因素,(v)创业资源,以及(vi)创业模式。该研究的发现为利益相关者提供了学术启示
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on ‘Start-up Success’ Covering the Period 1981-2019
Despite being received increasing attention from academic scholars, there have yet any review study on the topic of start-up success. This work fulfills this research gap by investigating 1554 start-up success documents collected from Scopus dataset between 1981 and 2019. Using bibliometric analysis, we reveal that the topic of start-up success only receives more attention from academic scholars since 2011 onwards. Regarding geographical distribution, the US, Germany, and the UK are the three countries contributing the highest number of start-up success related documents. Besides, it’s revealed that 305 (or 19.6%) start-up success documents were published in the top 20 journals. The co-author analysis found that the research groups of start-up success are still small and dispersed and there was a lack of continuity in the research. The science mapping identified six main topics of start-up success, including: (1) Business in General, (2) Start-up Ecosystem, (iii) Academic Start-up, (iv) Drivers of Start-up Success, (v) Resources for start-up, and (vi) Start-up Model. The study’s findings provide implications for stakeholders, academic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Scientometric Research
Journal of Scientometric Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Publications on Environmental Innovation Exploring the Impact of Altmetrics in Relation to Citation Count and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) Social Networking and Gender-Homophily in Article Publications: A Tale of Two Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) Nanotechnology in Food Production: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Using R-package How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1