全膝关节置换术后短期膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(kos)的最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性队列研究

J. Nishimoto, Shigeharu Tanaka, Y. Inoue, R. Tanaka
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后短期膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(kos)的最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"J. Nishimoto, Shigeharu Tanaka, Y. Inoue, R. Tanaka","doi":"10.1177/22104917231181644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the anchor method. Methods: Scores for each KOOS subscale were calculated preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively to create receiver operating characteristic curves, and the MCIDs were calculated. Results: The KOOS MCIDs at 3 months after TKA were 6 for symptoms, 10 for pain, 6 for activities of daily living (ADL), 8 for sport/recreation, and 10 for quality of life (QOL). The KOOS MCIDs at 6 months after TKA were 9 for symptoms, 13 for pain, 10 for ADL, 9 for sport/recreation, and 16 for QOL. The areas under the curves were in the range of 0.8–0.9 at both 3 and 6 months after TKA. Conclusion: MCIDs by KOOS subscales were determined and were highly accurate.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal clinically important differences in short-term postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"J. Nishimoto, Shigeharu Tanaka, Y. Inoue, R. Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917231181644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the anchor method. Methods: Scores for each KOOS subscale were calculated preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively to create receiver operating characteristic curves, and the MCIDs were calculated. Results: The KOOS MCIDs at 3 months after TKA were 6 for symptoms, 10 for pain, 6 for activities of daily living (ADL), 8 for sport/recreation, and 10 for quality of life (QOL). The KOOS MCIDs at 6 months after TKA were 9 for symptoms, 13 for pain, 10 for ADL, 9 for sport/recreation, and 16 for QOL. The areas under the curves were in the range of 0.8–0.9 at both 3 and 6 months after TKA. Conclusion: MCIDs by KOOS subscales were determined and were highly accurate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231181644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231181644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究的目的是使用锚定法确定全膝关节置换术(TKA)后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)的短期最小临床重要差异(MCIDs)。方法:术前及术后3、6个月分别计算kos各分量表得分,形成受试者工作特征曲线,计算MCIDs。结果:TKA后3个月的KOOS MCIDs为症状6分,疼痛10分,日常生活活动(ADL) 6分,运动/娱乐8分,生活质量(QOL) 10分。TKA后6个月的KOOS mcid为症状9分,疼痛13分,ADL 10分,运动/娱乐9分,生活质量16分。TKA后3个月和6个月曲线下面积在0.8-0.9之间。结论:kos亚量表测定的MCIDs具有较高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal clinically important differences in short-term postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study
Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the anchor method. Methods: Scores for each KOOS subscale were calculated preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively to create receiver operating characteristic curves, and the MCIDs were calculated. Results: The KOOS MCIDs at 3 months after TKA were 6 for symptoms, 10 for pain, 6 for activities of daily living (ADL), 8 for sport/recreation, and 10 for quality of life (QOL). The KOOS MCIDs at 6 months after TKA were 9 for symptoms, 13 for pain, 10 for ADL, 9 for sport/recreation, and 16 for QOL. The areas under the curves were in the range of 0.8–0.9 at both 3 and 6 months after TKA. Conclusion: MCIDs by KOOS subscales were determined and were highly accurate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1