{"title":"组织语篇分析何去何从?来自悖论和领导力研究的案例","authors":"Gail T. Fairhurst","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2022.2137256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this essay, I explore the possible declining interest in Organizational Discourse Analysis (ODA) in the organisational sciences. Towards that end, I focus on what some analysts mistake about it, why it is particularly suited to the study of paradox and leadership, and how ODA scholars can sustain interest in these approaches.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"16 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whither organisational discourse analysis? The case from paradox and leadership research\",\"authors\":\"Gail T. Fairhurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22041451.2022.2137256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this essay, I explore the possible declining interest in Organizational Discourse Analysis (ODA) in the organisational sciences. Towards that end, I focus on what some analysts mistake about it, why it is particularly suited to the study of paradox and leadership, and how ODA scholars can sustain interest in these approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2137256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2137256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Whither organisational discourse analysis? The case from paradox and leadership research
ABSTRACT In this essay, I explore the possible declining interest in Organizational Discourse Analysis (ODA) in the organisational sciences. Towards that end, I focus on what some analysts mistake about it, why it is particularly suited to the study of paradox and leadership, and how ODA scholars can sustain interest in these approaches.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
