众包POI标签:位置感知结果推理和任务分配

Huiqi Hu, Yudian Zheng, Z. Bao, Guoliang Li, Jianhua Feng, Reynold Cheng
{"title":"众包POI标签:位置感知结果推理和任务分配","authors":"Huiqi Hu, Yudian Zheng, Z. Bao, Guoliang Li, Jianhua Feng, Reynold Cheng","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2016.7498229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying the labels of points of interest (POIs), aka POI labelling, provides significant benefits in location-based services. However, the quality of raw labels manually added by users or generated by artificial algorithms cannot be guaranteed. Such low-quality labels decrease the usability and result in bad user experiences. In this paper, by observing that crowdsourcing is a best-fit for computer-hard tasks, we leverage crowdsourcing to improve the quality of POI labelling. To our best knowledge, this is the first work on crowdsourced POI labelling tasks. In particular, there are two sub-problems: (1) how to infer the correct labels for each POI based on workers' answers, and (2) how to effectively assign proper tasks to workers in order to make more accurate inference for next available workers. To address these two problems, we propose a framework consisting of an inference model and an online task assigner. The inference model measures the quality of a worker on a POI by elaborately exploiting (i) worker's inherent quality, (ii) the spatial distance between the worker and the POI, and (iii) the POI influence, which can provide reliable inference results once a worker submits an answer. As workers are dynamically coming, the online task assigner judiciously assigns proper tasks to them so as to benefit the inference. The inference model and task assigner work alternately to continuously improve the overall quality. We conduct extensive experiments on a real crowdsourcing platform, and the results on two real datasets show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.","PeriodicalId":6883,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"61-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowdsourced POI labelling: Location-aware result inference and Task Assignment\",\"authors\":\"Huiqi Hu, Yudian Zheng, Z. Bao, Guoliang Li, Jianhua Feng, Reynold Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDE.2016.7498229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying the labels of points of interest (POIs), aka POI labelling, provides significant benefits in location-based services. However, the quality of raw labels manually added by users or generated by artificial algorithms cannot be guaranteed. Such low-quality labels decrease the usability and result in bad user experiences. In this paper, by observing that crowdsourcing is a best-fit for computer-hard tasks, we leverage crowdsourcing to improve the quality of POI labelling. To our best knowledge, this is the first work on crowdsourced POI labelling tasks. In particular, there are two sub-problems: (1) how to infer the correct labels for each POI based on workers' answers, and (2) how to effectively assign proper tasks to workers in order to make more accurate inference for next available workers. To address these two problems, we propose a framework consisting of an inference model and an online task assigner. The inference model measures the quality of a worker on a POI by elaborately exploiting (i) worker's inherent quality, (ii) the spatial distance between the worker and the POI, and (iii) the POI influence, which can provide reliable inference results once a worker submits an answer. As workers are dynamically coming, the online task assigner judiciously assigns proper tasks to them so as to benefit the inference. The inference model and task assigner work alternately to continuously improve the overall quality. We conduct extensive experiments on a real crowdsourcing platform, and the results on two real datasets show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"61-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"90\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2016.7498229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2016.7498229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

摘要

识别兴趣点(POI)的标签,也就是POI标签,为基于位置的服务提供了显著的好处。但是,用户手工添加或人工算法生成的原始标签的质量无法保证。这种低质量的标签降低了可用性,导致糟糕的用户体验。在本文中,通过观察众包最适合计算机硬任务,我们利用众包来提高POI标记的质量。据我们所知,这是第一个关于众包POI标签任务的工作。特别是,有两个子问题:(1)如何根据工人的答案推断每个POI的正确标签,以及(2)如何有效地为工人分配适当的任务,以便对下一个可用的工人做出更准确的推断。为了解决这两个问题,我们提出了一个由推理模型和在线任务分配器组成的框架。推理模型通过精心利用(i)工人的内在素质,(ii)工人与POI之间的空间距离,以及(iii) POI影响来衡量POI上工人的素质,POI影响可以在工人提交答案后提供可靠的推理结果。由于工作人员是动态到来的,在线任务分配器会明智地为他们分配适当的任务,从而有利于推理。推理模型和任务分配器交替工作,不断提高整体质量。我们在一个真实的众包平台上进行了大量的实验,两个真实数据集的结果表明,我们的方法明显优于最先进的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crowdsourced POI labelling: Location-aware result inference and Task Assignment
Identifying the labels of points of interest (POIs), aka POI labelling, provides significant benefits in location-based services. However, the quality of raw labels manually added by users or generated by artificial algorithms cannot be guaranteed. Such low-quality labels decrease the usability and result in bad user experiences. In this paper, by observing that crowdsourcing is a best-fit for computer-hard tasks, we leverage crowdsourcing to improve the quality of POI labelling. To our best knowledge, this is the first work on crowdsourced POI labelling tasks. In particular, there are two sub-problems: (1) how to infer the correct labels for each POI based on workers' answers, and (2) how to effectively assign proper tasks to workers in order to make more accurate inference for next available workers. To address these two problems, we propose a framework consisting of an inference model and an online task assigner. The inference model measures the quality of a worker on a POI by elaborately exploiting (i) worker's inherent quality, (ii) the spatial distance between the worker and the POI, and (iii) the POI influence, which can provide reliable inference results once a worker submits an answer. As workers are dynamically coming, the online task assigner judiciously assigns proper tasks to them so as to benefit the inference. The inference model and task assigner work alternately to continuously improve the overall quality. We conduct extensive experiments on a real crowdsourcing platform, and the results on two real datasets show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data profiling SEED: A system for entity exploration and debugging in large-scale knowledge graphs TemProRA: Top-k temporal-probabilistic results analysis Durable graph pattern queries on historical graphs SCouT: Scalable coupled matrix-tensor factorization - algorithm and discoveries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1