中欧和东欧国家的价值现代化:英格尔哈特的理论如何运作?

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.13060/CSR.2020.033
Beatrice Elena Chromková Manea, L. Rabušic
{"title":"中欧和东欧国家的价值现代化:英格尔哈特的理论如何运作?","authors":"Beatrice Elena Chromková Manea, L. Rabušic","doi":"10.13060/CSR.2020.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An intergenerational shift from more pro-family norms to individual-choice norms has been taking place since the 1980s. Conditions of economic and social security positively contributed to this shift especially in high-income countries. In this paper, we study the modernisation change on value structures in selected Central and Eastern European countries and compare them with Western European ones and look at the generational differences. We first check whether the value shift is moving in the assumed direction and whether it is copying trends observed in Western European countries. We then look at different generations to determine whether the younger generations in CEE countries that grew up after 1989, in a time of rapid economic and political change, show higher levels of post-materialist and post-modern values than the generations socialised and raised during the communist regime. We use data collected by the international repeated cross-sectional European Values Study (EVS). The results are not clear-cut on whether socioeconomic modernisation has led to higher shares of post-materialism, more gender-egalitarian attitudes, and stronger support for individual-choice norms in CEE countries. In all the spheres of cultural modernisation analysed we found differences in values and attitudes between generations: the older generations were always more traditional than the younger generations. This was not just true in the CEE countries, as the same trend was recorded in the Western European countries.","PeriodicalId":45665,"journal":{"name":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","volume":"71 1","pages":"699-740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value Modernisation in Central and Eastern European Countries: How Does Inglehart's Theory Work?\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Elena Chromková Manea, L. Rabušic\",\"doi\":\"10.13060/CSR.2020.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An intergenerational shift from more pro-family norms to individual-choice norms has been taking place since the 1980s. Conditions of economic and social security positively contributed to this shift especially in high-income countries. In this paper, we study the modernisation change on value structures in selected Central and Eastern European countries and compare them with Western European ones and look at the generational differences. We first check whether the value shift is moving in the assumed direction and whether it is copying trends observed in Western European countries. We then look at different generations to determine whether the younger generations in CEE countries that grew up after 1989, in a time of rapid economic and political change, show higher levels of post-materialist and post-modern values than the generations socialised and raised during the communist regime. We use data collected by the international repeated cross-sectional European Values Study (EVS). The results are not clear-cut on whether socioeconomic modernisation has led to higher shares of post-materialism, more gender-egalitarian attitudes, and stronger support for individual-choice norms in CEE countries. In all the spheres of cultural modernisation analysed we found differences in values and attitudes between generations: the older generations were always more traditional than the younger generations. This was not just true in the CEE countries, as the same trend was recorded in the Western European countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"699-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13060/CSR.2020.033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologicky Casopis-Czech Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13060/CSR.2020.033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,从更支持家庭的规范向个人选择规范的代际转变一直在发生。经济和社会保障条件对这种转变起到了积极作用,特别是在高收入国家。本文研究了中欧和东欧国家价值结构的现代化变化,并与西欧国家进行了比较,并观察了代际差异。我们首先检查价值转移是否朝着假设的方向移动,以及它是否复制了在西欧国家观察到的趋势。然后,我们观察不同的世代,以确定1989年之后在经济和政治快速变革时期长大的中东欧国家的年轻一代是否比在共产主义政权下社会化和成长的几代人表现出更高水平的后唯物主义和后现代价值观。我们使用国际重复横断面欧洲价值观研究(EVS)收集的数据。在中东欧国家,社会经济现代化是否导致了更高比例的后物质主义、更多的性别平等主义态度以及对个人选择规范的更强支持,研究结果并不明确。在分析文化现代化的所有领域中,我们发现了代际之间价值观和态度的差异:老一代总是比年轻一代更传统。这种情况不仅发生在中东欧国家,西欧国家也出现了同样的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value Modernisation in Central and Eastern European Countries: How Does Inglehart's Theory Work?
An intergenerational shift from more pro-family norms to individual-choice norms has been taking place since the 1980s. Conditions of economic and social security positively contributed to this shift especially in high-income countries. In this paper, we study the modernisation change on value structures in selected Central and Eastern European countries and compare them with Western European ones and look at the generational differences. We first check whether the value shift is moving in the assumed direction and whether it is copying trends observed in Western European countries. We then look at different generations to determine whether the younger generations in CEE countries that grew up after 1989, in a time of rapid economic and political change, show higher levels of post-materialist and post-modern values than the generations socialised and raised during the communist regime. We use data collected by the international repeated cross-sectional European Values Study (EVS). The results are not clear-cut on whether socioeconomic modernisation has led to higher shares of post-materialism, more gender-egalitarian attitudes, and stronger support for individual-choice norms in CEE countries. In all the spheres of cultural modernisation analysed we found differences in values and attitudes between generations: the older generations were always more traditional than the younger generations. This was not just true in the CEE countries, as the same trend was recorded in the Western European countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Sociologický časopis je recenzovaný vědecký časopis publikující původní příspěvky k poznání společnosti od českých i zahraničních autorů. Vychází od roku 1965. Časopis přináší stati zabývající se otázkami teoretické sociologie, články zkoumající transformační jevy a sociální procesy probíhající v postkomunistických společnostech, přehledové články zpracovávající vývoj v široké paletě oborů sociologie a příbuzných sociálních věd, informace ze sociologických výzkumů.
期刊最新文献
Petr Gibas a kol.: Bydlení mladých v době krize Michal Kaplánek (ed.): Volný čas dětí staršího školního věku Martin Potůček: Anatomie komunismu: Skutečný příběh jedné rodiny Between Politicisation and Depoliticisation: Restitution of Church Property in Czech Republic What Is Early Childhood Education and Care For? How ECEC for Children up to the Age of Three Is (Not) Discussed in the Czech Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1