不是放之四海而皆准的方法论:混合方法的调查

W. Liping, Lin Hsin-Hui
{"title":"不是放之四海而皆准的方法论:混合方法的调查","authors":"W. Liping, Lin Hsin-Hui","doi":"10.22606/JAER.2017.22005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.","PeriodicalId":100751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not a One-Size-Fits-All Methodology: A Survey of Mixed Methods\",\"authors\":\"W. Liping, Lin Hsin-Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.22606/JAER.2017.22005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22606/JAER.2017.22005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22606/JAER.2017.22005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文处于混合方法的历史发展中,旨在通过对以往文献的综述来呈现混合方法的整体图景。它检查了混合方法的各个方面,包括其定义,基本原理,抽样,研究设计,程序,优势和劣势,以及使用混合方法的冲突观点。论文最后指出,虽然混合方法在通过利用定量和定性方法进行广泛的研究方面具有优势,并减少了与单一方法相关的局限性,但研究人员应该意识到,他们没有提供最佳的研究实践,因此终止了所有关于研究方法的辩论。为了更全面、更准确地认识世界,研究人员不应该停止寻找其他哲学和研究方法的努力,在这项工作中,定量研究人员和定性研究人员之间的合作是强烈建议的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not a One-Size-Fits-All Methodology: A Survey of Mixed Methods
Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exemplary Educators Who Embrace a Teaching Philosophy Guided by a Pedagogy of Kindness The Important Role of the Associative and the Deductive Approaches in the Study of Bioactive Glasses Research on Advantaged Discipline Group of Green Steel Intelligent Equipment and System The Role of Learning Analytic in Education Reform Effect of School Facilities Utilization on the Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in Wukari Metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1