历史水域主张的可能国际渊源:国际司法判决、国际法庭程序和条约

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Historic Environment-Policy & Practice Pub Date : 2019-02-18 DOI:10.1163/EJ.9789004163508.I-322.30
C. Symmons
{"title":"历史水域主张的可能国际渊源:国际司法判决、国际法庭程序和条约","authors":"C. Symmons","doi":"10.1163/EJ.9789004163508.I-322.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence of the origin of a particular historic claim may most obviously arise from intraterritorial actions in claimant State such in a decree, legislation or judicial decision; but they may also arise, in whole or in part, from some external agency such as international treaty or adjudication. Where restricted maritime rights claims are imposed by treaty between two or more States, it is possible that this may mark the beginning of an historic waters regime between the parties to treaty which may later expand erga omnes. A specific finding by an international tribunal as to historic status of particular waters may have an effect even erga omnes and beyond the parties to a particular dispute submitted to an international tribunal. This chapter discusses some of these various types of documentary evidence of a claim to historic waters in following headings: international adjudication and historic status of waters fixed under treaties.Keywords: historic claim; historic waters; international adjudication; international judicial decision; international treaty; international tribunal; maritime rights claims","PeriodicalId":44519,"journal":{"name":"Historic Environment-Policy & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possible International Origins of Historic Claims to Waters: International Judicial Decisions, Proceedings before International Tribunals, and Treaties\",\"authors\":\"C. Symmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/EJ.9789004163508.I-322.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence of the origin of a particular historic claim may most obviously arise from intraterritorial actions in claimant State such in a decree, legislation or judicial decision; but they may also arise, in whole or in part, from some external agency such as international treaty or adjudication. Where restricted maritime rights claims are imposed by treaty between two or more States, it is possible that this may mark the beginning of an historic waters regime between the parties to treaty which may later expand erga omnes. A specific finding by an international tribunal as to historic status of particular waters may have an effect even erga omnes and beyond the parties to a particular dispute submitted to an international tribunal. This chapter discusses some of these various types of documentary evidence of a claim to historic waters in following headings: international adjudication and historic status of waters fixed under treaties.Keywords: historic claim; historic waters; international adjudication; international judicial decision; international treaty; international tribunal; maritime rights claims\",\"PeriodicalId\":44519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historic Environment-Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historic Environment-Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004163508.I-322.30\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historic Environment-Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004163508.I-322.30","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项特定历史要求的起源的证据最明显地可能来自于索赔国的领土内行动,如法令、立法或司法决定;但它们也可能全部或部分地来自某些外部机构,如国际条约或裁决。如果限制海洋权利的要求是由两个或两个以上国家之间的条约强加的,这可能标志着条约缔约国之间一种历史性的水制度的开始,这种制度后来可能扩大到普遍范围。国际法庭对某一水域的历史地位作出的具体裁决,其影响甚至可能超越向国际法庭提交的某一争端当事方。本章在以下标题中讨论对历史水域提出主权要求的一些不同类型的文件证据:国际裁决和根据条约确定的水域的历史地位。关键词:历史主张;历史性水域;国际裁决;国际司法裁判;国际条约;国际法庭;海事权利请求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Possible International Origins of Historic Claims to Waters: International Judicial Decisions, Proceedings before International Tribunals, and Treaties
Evidence of the origin of a particular historic claim may most obviously arise from intraterritorial actions in claimant State such in a decree, legislation or judicial decision; but they may also arise, in whole or in part, from some external agency such as international treaty or adjudication. Where restricted maritime rights claims are imposed by treaty between two or more States, it is possible that this may mark the beginning of an historic waters regime between the parties to treaty which may later expand erga omnes. A specific finding by an international tribunal as to historic status of particular waters may have an effect even erga omnes and beyond the parties to a particular dispute submitted to an international tribunal. This chapter discusses some of these various types of documentary evidence of a claim to historic waters in following headings: international adjudication and historic status of waters fixed under treaties.Keywords: historic claim; historic waters; international adjudication; international judicial decision; international treaty; international tribunal; maritime rights claims
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historic Environment-Policy & Practice
Historic Environment-Policy & Practice HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
26.70%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Correction to: Co-evolutionary Dynamics of the Development of Connection for Policy Conflict Resolution by Policy Actors Across Advocacy Coalitions and Their Media Attention-Seeking Strategies in Environmental Governance Policy Network Ties in the Dynamic Process of Environmental Conflict Resolution Replacement of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) with Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) and Its Socioeconomic Impact in Afghanistan Emerging Research in Alternative Crops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1