罗马尼亚人的国家和领土统一-合法性和合法性

A. Arseni
{"title":"罗马尼亚人的国家和领土统一-合法性和合法性","authors":"A. Arseni","doi":"10.18662/upalaw/27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The national and territorial unity of the Romanians was and is a research topic approached especially during the 18-20 centuries and it continues to be a current topic nowadays. The problem was exposed and argued on historical, juridical, diplomatic and even moral levels. Beginning with the occupation from 1940 (resumed in 1944) and till the proclamation of independence of the Republic of Moldova and present times there have been outlined two diametrically opposed movements: One natural and divine - reunion with Mother-country - Romania and the other one being exported and explained by Russia - „statality”. On the edge of this dispute, as a result of a complex study of juridical acts ( meaning that we do not neglect the other proreunion studies), the present article, fully sharing the eternal truth of national and territorial unity of the Romanians, as a unique European people, divided into two states, argues this truth through the prism of constitutional and international right, through the prism of juridical legitimity principle on the background of the other areas of existence and prosperity of a nation.","PeriodicalId":30571,"journal":{"name":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National and Territorial Reunification of the Romanians - Legality and Legitimity\",\"authors\":\"A. Arseni\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/upalaw/27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The national and territorial unity of the Romanians was and is a research topic approached especially during the 18-20 centuries and it continues to be a current topic nowadays. The problem was exposed and argued on historical, juridical, diplomatic and even moral levels. Beginning with the occupation from 1940 (resumed in 1944) and till the proclamation of independence of the Republic of Moldova and present times there have been outlined two diametrically opposed movements: One natural and divine - reunion with Mother-country - Romania and the other one being exported and explained by Russia - „statality”. On the edge of this dispute, as a result of a complex study of juridical acts ( meaning that we do not neglect the other proreunion studies), the present article, fully sharing the eternal truth of national and territorial unity of the Romanians, as a unique European people, divided into two states, argues this truth through the prism of constitutional and international right, through the prism of juridical legitimity principle on the background of the other areas of existence and prosperity of a nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polis Revista de Stiinte Politice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/upalaw/27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗马尼亚人的国家和领土统一是一个研究课题,特别是在18-20世纪,今天仍然是一个当前的课题。这个问题在历史、司法、外交甚至道德层面都被揭露和争论。从1940年的占领开始(1944年恢复),直到摩尔多瓦共和国宣布独立和现在,出现了两种截然相反的运动:一种是自然的和神圣的- -与母国- -罗马尼亚团聚,另一种是输出的并由俄罗斯解释的- -“国家地位”。在这一争端的边缘,由于对法律行为进行了复杂的研究(意思是我们不忽视其他有关的研究),本文充分分享了罗马尼亚人作为一个分裂为两个国家的独特的欧洲人民的民族和领土统一的永恒真理,并通过宪法和国际权利的棱镜论证了这一真理。透过司法正当性原则的棱镜,背景下的其他领域的生存和繁荣的一个国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National and Territorial Reunification of the Romanians - Legality and Legitimity
The national and territorial unity of the Romanians was and is a research topic approached especially during the 18-20 centuries and it continues to be a current topic nowadays. The problem was exposed and argued on historical, juridical, diplomatic and even moral levels. Beginning with the occupation from 1940 (resumed in 1944) and till the proclamation of independence of the Republic of Moldova and present times there have been outlined two diametrically opposed movements: One natural and divine - reunion with Mother-country - Romania and the other one being exported and explained by Russia - „statality”. On the edge of this dispute, as a result of a complex study of juridical acts ( meaning that we do not neglect the other proreunion studies), the present article, fully sharing the eternal truth of national and territorial unity of the Romanians, as a unique European people, divided into two states, argues this truth through the prism of constitutional and international right, through the prism of juridical legitimity principle on the background of the other areas of existence and prosperity of a nation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The County and the Realm. Significations and Developments in the History of Romanian Administration Possibilities for Survival and Economic Recovery through Fiscal Relaxation in the Pandemic and Post-pandemic Period Highlighting Price Reductions in Customer Accounting Non-patrimonial Rights Defense – The Right to One's Own Image Main References in Financing the Construction of Dwellings in the Interwar Period in Romania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1