对19世纪末国内移民问题的贡献

Marija Kralj
{"title":"对19世纪末国内移民问题的贡献","authors":"Marija Kralj","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2282319k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serbia had been an immigrant nation for the better part of the 19th century. It is only in the very last decade that the trend had been reversed. The shift to emigration had been preceded by a process of various internal migrations. They were encouraged by the liberation of the four districts - Vranje, Nis, Pirot and Toplic - in which the acquiring new properties was substantially encouraged by the Agrarian Law (1880) and through agrarian loans (1882). A significant portion of the migrants coming from one of the liberated districts, Toplica, had come from the Krusevac District. Emigration from the Krusevac district, just like in the case of Rudnik and Uzice, was noticed by comtemporaries and subjected to inquiry. The Ministry of National Economy conducted a poll in 1902, testing how many residents had moved out from the mentioned three districts in the period between the liberation and the poll. The questions referred to their whereabouts, motivations and general chronology. The result of the inquest were reports detailing emigration from the Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts. Within the archives reports for a total of 51 municipalities were preserved. The Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts were composed out of 131 municipalities in total, so the preserved information encompasses a little under a half of the analyzed area. In total ca. 7.5 percent of the population had moved out of the relevant settlements. They were primarily motivated by the lack of land that can be cultivated (or at the very least, of insufficient quality). Agrarian overpopulation had been the principle motif for around 93.5 percent of the emigrants. It has been shown, relying on the agricultural data from the 1889, 1893, 1897, 1900, 1901 and 1902 census (for the entirety of Serbia), crops did not fulfill even the most basic needs of the population. Crop yield per resident in the Rudnik and Uzice district was the lowest of all and the situation was seldom dissimilar in the Krusevac district. The unsatisfactory agricultural output when it came to crops was likely impacted by unfavorable terrain. Therefore, it is hardly any wonder the emigrants had mostly been looking for new lands. Overpopulation was likewise confirmed by the specific dates and choice of settlement of the most frequent cases of migration. The liberation of the four districts and the demarcation had enticed a total of 25,09% of the total emigrants throughout 1878 and 1879. Subsequently, the Agrarian Relations Law additionally facilitated a total of 30,1% of emigrants in 1880.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution to the issue of internal migrations at the end of the 19th century\",\"authors\":\"Marija Kralj\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zmsdn2282319k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Serbia had been an immigrant nation for the better part of the 19th century. It is only in the very last decade that the trend had been reversed. The shift to emigration had been preceded by a process of various internal migrations. They were encouraged by the liberation of the four districts - Vranje, Nis, Pirot and Toplic - in which the acquiring new properties was substantially encouraged by the Agrarian Law (1880) and through agrarian loans (1882). A significant portion of the migrants coming from one of the liberated districts, Toplica, had come from the Krusevac District. Emigration from the Krusevac district, just like in the case of Rudnik and Uzice, was noticed by comtemporaries and subjected to inquiry. The Ministry of National Economy conducted a poll in 1902, testing how many residents had moved out from the mentioned three districts in the period between the liberation and the poll. The questions referred to their whereabouts, motivations and general chronology. The result of the inquest were reports detailing emigration from the Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts. Within the archives reports for a total of 51 municipalities were preserved. The Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts were composed out of 131 municipalities in total, so the preserved information encompasses a little under a half of the analyzed area. In total ca. 7.5 percent of the population had moved out of the relevant settlements. They were primarily motivated by the lack of land that can be cultivated (or at the very least, of insufficient quality). Agrarian overpopulation had been the principle motif for around 93.5 percent of the emigrants. It has been shown, relying on the agricultural data from the 1889, 1893, 1897, 1900, 1901 and 1902 census (for the entirety of Serbia), crops did not fulfill even the most basic needs of the population. Crop yield per resident in the Rudnik and Uzice district was the lowest of all and the situation was seldom dissimilar in the Krusevac district. The unsatisfactory agricultural output when it came to crops was likely impacted by unfavorable terrain. Therefore, it is hardly any wonder the emigrants had mostly been looking for new lands. Overpopulation was likewise confirmed by the specific dates and choice of settlement of the most frequent cases of migration. The liberation of the four districts and the demarcation had enticed a total of 25,09% of the total emigrants throughout 1878 and 1879. Subsequently, the Agrarian Relations Law additionally facilitated a total of 30,1% of emigrants in 1880.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2282319k\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2282319k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在19世纪的大部分时间里,塞尔维亚一直是一个移民国家。直到最近十年,这一趋势才被逆转。在向移民转移之前,已经有了各种国内移民的过程。他们受到弗兰涅、尼斯、皮罗特和托普利克四个地区解放的鼓舞,在这些地区,《土地法》(1880年)和通过土地贷款(1882年)大大鼓励购置新财产。来自解放区之一托普利察的移民中有很大一部分来自克鲁塞瓦茨区。就像鲁德尼克和乌兹兹的情况一样,来自克鲁塞瓦茨地区的移民被同时代的人注意到了,并受到了调查。国民经济部于1902年进行了调查,调查了光复后到调查期间,上述3个地区有多少居民迁出。这些问题涉及他们的下落、动机和大致时间顺序。调查的结果是详细报告了从克鲁塞瓦茨、鲁德尼克和乌采兹地区移民的情况。档案中共保存了51个城市的报告。Krusevac、Rudnik和Uzice地区是131个城市中的一个,因此保存下来的信息涵盖了不到一半的分析区域。总共约有7.5%的人口迁出了有关的定居点。他们的主要动机是缺乏可耕种的土地(或者至少是质量不足)。大约93.5%的移民的主要动机是农业人口过剩。根据1889年、1893年、1897年、1900年、1901年和1902年(整个塞尔维亚)人口普查的农业数据显示,农作物甚至不能满足人口最基本的需求。鲁德尼克和乌采兹地区的人均作物产量是所有地区中最低的,克鲁塞瓦茨地区的情况也很少不同。农作物产量不理想很可能受到不利地形的影响。因此,移民大多是在寻找新的土地也就不足为奇了。最频繁的移徙的具体日期和定居地点的选择同样证实了人口过剩。1878年至1879年间,四个区的解放和划界吸引了总移民人数的2509%。随后,1880年《土地关系法》又为移民提供了30.1%的便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contribution to the issue of internal migrations at the end of the 19th century
Serbia had been an immigrant nation for the better part of the 19th century. It is only in the very last decade that the trend had been reversed. The shift to emigration had been preceded by a process of various internal migrations. They were encouraged by the liberation of the four districts - Vranje, Nis, Pirot and Toplic - in which the acquiring new properties was substantially encouraged by the Agrarian Law (1880) and through agrarian loans (1882). A significant portion of the migrants coming from one of the liberated districts, Toplica, had come from the Krusevac District. Emigration from the Krusevac district, just like in the case of Rudnik and Uzice, was noticed by comtemporaries and subjected to inquiry. The Ministry of National Economy conducted a poll in 1902, testing how many residents had moved out from the mentioned three districts in the period between the liberation and the poll. The questions referred to their whereabouts, motivations and general chronology. The result of the inquest were reports detailing emigration from the Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts. Within the archives reports for a total of 51 municipalities were preserved. The Krusevac, Rudnik and Uzice districts were composed out of 131 municipalities in total, so the preserved information encompasses a little under a half of the analyzed area. In total ca. 7.5 percent of the population had moved out of the relevant settlements. They were primarily motivated by the lack of land that can be cultivated (or at the very least, of insufficient quality). Agrarian overpopulation had been the principle motif for around 93.5 percent of the emigrants. It has been shown, relying on the agricultural data from the 1889, 1893, 1897, 1900, 1901 and 1902 census (for the entirety of Serbia), crops did not fulfill even the most basic needs of the population. Crop yield per resident in the Rudnik and Uzice district was the lowest of all and the situation was seldom dissimilar in the Krusevac district. The unsatisfactory agricultural output when it came to crops was likely impacted by unfavorable terrain. Therefore, it is hardly any wonder the emigrants had mostly been looking for new lands. Overpopulation was likewise confirmed by the specific dates and choice of settlement of the most frequent cases of migration. The liberation of the four districts and the demarcation had enticed a total of 25,09% of the total emigrants throughout 1878 and 1879. Subsequently, the Agrarian Relations Law additionally facilitated a total of 30,1% of emigrants in 1880.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bank performance analysis and identification of key determinants of electronic banking customer satisfaction - balanced scorecard approach Competition among interest group - mechanism and consequences The selection of topics in good practice of teaching the holocaust in England and Republica Srpska: A case study Development, state and perspectives of urban geography with special review of Serbia Ideal fundaments of the history of education as teaching disciplines in Serbia in the 19th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1