{"title":"斯里兰卡的无名宪法和权力分享","authors":"Sanjayan Rajasingham","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Sanjayan Rajasingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2057107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Innominate constitutions and power-sharing in Sri Lanka
ABSTRACT If a constitution with a federal label is politically impossible in Sri Lanka, might an innominate constitution be the next-best alternative? This article draws on comparative experience in India, South Africa and Spain to argue in favour of an innominate constitution for Sri Lanka. The experience of these states suggests pathways that can both federalize an innominate constitution and build the constitutional culture necessary for a future, explicitly federal, Sri Lankan constitution.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
