第三部分:征稿

IF 0.5 0 ARCHITECTURE Technology Architecture and Design Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/24751448.2021.1863669
W. Newman
{"title":"第三部分:征稿","authors":"W. Newman","doi":"10.1080/24751448.2021.1863669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research methods is a developing area of interest in the built environment and OPEN to discussion. The concept of research encompasses ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Methodological choice often relates to the philosophical position of the researcher and the analyzed phenomenon. This is to say, closer consideration tells us that methods can be distinct from the products and aims of the research, such as knowledge and prediction. Methods are also different from the epistemic regimes that inform the values and justifications of the research aims, such as reproducibility or objectivity used to rationalize the use of a specific method or its method of evaluation. Methods cannot be derived from the places, problems, phenomena, disciplines, technologies, or conventions and professional habits associated with research. Recognizing there is a specific, rather than general, integrity of methods destabilizes the historically singular theories of methodological approach and suggests we can develop methods of applied research in design and the built environment without compromising the reliability of known methodological structures.","PeriodicalId":36812,"journal":{"name":"Technology Architecture and Design","volume":"10 1","pages":"44 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open III: Call for Papers\",\"authors\":\"W. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24751448.2021.1863669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research methods is a developing area of interest in the built environment and OPEN to discussion. The concept of research encompasses ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Methodological choice often relates to the philosophical position of the researcher and the analyzed phenomenon. This is to say, closer consideration tells us that methods can be distinct from the products and aims of the research, such as knowledge and prediction. Methods are also different from the epistemic regimes that inform the values and justifications of the research aims, such as reproducibility or objectivity used to rationalize the use of a specific method or its method of evaluation. Methods cannot be derived from the places, problems, phenomena, disciplines, technologies, or conventions and professional habits associated with research. Recognizing there is a specific, rather than general, integrity of methods destabilizes the historically singular theories of methodological approach and suggests we can develop methods of applied research in design and the built environment without compromising the reliability of known methodological structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Architecture and Design\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Architecture and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2021.1863669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Architecture and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2021.1863669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究方法在建筑环境中是一个发展中的领域,值得讨论。研究的概念包括本体论、认识论、方法论和方法。方法论的选择往往与研究者的哲学立场和所分析的现象有关。也就是说,更仔细的考虑告诉我们,方法可以不同于研究的产品和目的,比如知识和预测。方法也不同于告知研究目标的价值和理由的认知制度,例如用于合理化使用特定方法或其评估方法的可重复性或客观性。方法不能从与研究相关的地点、问题、现象、学科、技术或惯例和专业习惯中得出。认识到有一种特定的,而不是一般的方法的完整性,动摇了历史上单一的方法方法理论,并建议我们可以在不损害已知方法结构可靠性的情况下,在设计和建筑环境中开发应用研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open III: Call for Papers
Research methods is a developing area of interest in the built environment and OPEN to discussion. The concept of research encompasses ontology, epistemology, methodology, and methods. Methodological choice often relates to the philosophical position of the researcher and the analyzed phenomenon. This is to say, closer consideration tells us that methods can be distinct from the products and aims of the research, such as knowledge and prediction. Methods are also different from the epistemic regimes that inform the values and justifications of the research aims, such as reproducibility or objectivity used to rationalize the use of a specific method or its method of evaluation. Methods cannot be derived from the places, problems, phenomena, disciplines, technologies, or conventions and professional habits associated with research. Recognizing there is a specific, rather than general, integrity of methods destabilizes the historically singular theories of methodological approach and suggests we can develop methods of applied research in design and the built environment without compromising the reliability of known methodological structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Architecture and Design
Technology Architecture and Design Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
TAD 7:1 Issue PDF Synergetic Optimization of Timber Structures and Space The Performance of Tectonics The Long Wait for the Inevitable: Metanarratives of Construction Löyly Sauna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1