马什哈德牙科学院牙周病系近二十年(1994-2014)研究的批判性评价

M. Mokhtari, A. Moeintaghavi, H. Arab, Sabete Bagheri Sabzevar
{"title":"马什哈德牙科学院牙周病系近二十年(1994-2014)研究的批判性评价","authors":"M. Mokhtari, A. Moeintaghavi, H. Arab, Sabete Bagheri Sabzevar","doi":"10.22038/JDMT.2021.17651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical appraisal of research studies is an essential process in quality assessments and development, in which various aspects of a subject are carefully analyzed. In recent decades, many articles have been published in medical journals especially in dental field, without being officially criticized. Citing results of these epidemiological studies requires proper validation. The validation is performed through ‘critical appraisal’ according to standard criteria and checklists. In this paper, 81 studies conducted between 1994 and 2014 in periodontics field in dentistry were divided into five categories: observational studies, diagnostic, clinical, animal, and meta-analysis, and reviewed by STROBE, STARD, CONSORT, ARRIVE, PRISMA Checklists. In most studies, participants' characteristics and inclusion and exclusion criteria were mentioned. In most studies, random sampling was not performed without bias. It is hoped that in future studies, researchers will use standard checklists from the initial stages of the study to obtain valid and scientific results.","PeriodicalId":15640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","volume":"254 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Appraisal of Studies Conducted in the Department of Periodontics, Mashhad School of Dentistry, in the Last Twenty Years (1994-2014)\",\"authors\":\"M. Mokhtari, A. Moeintaghavi, H. Arab, Sabete Bagheri Sabzevar\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/JDMT.2021.17651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical appraisal of research studies is an essential process in quality assessments and development, in which various aspects of a subject are carefully analyzed. In recent decades, many articles have been published in medical journals especially in dental field, without being officially criticized. Citing results of these epidemiological studies requires proper validation. The validation is performed through ‘critical appraisal’ according to standard criteria and checklists. In this paper, 81 studies conducted between 1994 and 2014 in periodontics field in dentistry were divided into five categories: observational studies, diagnostic, clinical, animal, and meta-analysis, and reviewed by STROBE, STARD, CONSORT, ARRIVE, PRISMA Checklists. In most studies, participants' characteristics and inclusion and exclusion criteria were mentioned. In most studies, random sampling was not performed without bias. It is hoped that in future studies, researchers will use standard checklists from the initial stages of the study to obtain valid and scientific results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques\",\"volume\":\"254 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2021.17651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JDMT.2021.17651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的批判性评估是质量评估和发展的一个重要过程,在这个过程中,一个主题的各个方面都被仔细分析。近几十年来,在医学期刊上发表了许多文章,特别是在牙科领域,没有受到正式的批评。引用这些流行病学研究的结果需要适当的验证。根据标准标准和清单,通过“关键评估”进行验证。本文将1994年至2014年在牙周病领域进行的81项研究分为观察性研究、诊断性研究、临床研究、动物研究和荟萃分析5类,并通过STROBE、STARD、CONSORT、ARRIVE、PRISMA检查表进行综述。在大多数研究中,都提到了被试的特征以及纳入和排除标准。在大多数研究中,随机抽样并不是没有偏差的。希望在未来的研究中,研究人员将使用研究初始阶段的标准清单来获得有效和科学的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Appraisal of Studies Conducted in the Department of Periodontics, Mashhad School of Dentistry, in the Last Twenty Years (1994-2014)
Critical appraisal of research studies is an essential process in quality assessments and development, in which various aspects of a subject are carefully analyzed. In recent decades, many articles have been published in medical journals especially in dental field, without being officially criticized. Citing results of these epidemiological studies requires proper validation. The validation is performed through ‘critical appraisal’ according to standard criteria and checklists. In this paper, 81 studies conducted between 1994 and 2014 in periodontics field in dentistry were divided into five categories: observational studies, diagnostic, clinical, animal, and meta-analysis, and reviewed by STROBE, STARD, CONSORT, ARRIVE, PRISMA Checklists. In most studies, participants' characteristics and inclusion and exclusion criteria were mentioned. In most studies, random sampling was not performed without bias. It is hoped that in future studies, researchers will use standard checklists from the initial stages of the study to obtain valid and scientific results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Citric Acid in Endodontics: A Review The Evaluation of the Effect of Coffee Staining and 16% Carbamide Peroxide Bleaching on the Color Change of Chairside CAD/CAM Ceramics Intentional Replantation: an Approach to Save Hopeless Natural Teeth (A Case Report) The Effect of Linear and Angular Midline Deviation on Smile Attractiveness Regarding Facial Height Evaluation of the Polymerization Properties of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1