{"title":"灾难后创伤后应激症状的性别差异:事件量表影响的差异项目功能分析-修订","authors":"Jennifer M. First, Wes Bonifay, J. Houston","doi":"10.1086/717263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although research indicates that women are more likely than men to report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following exposure to a disaster event, few studies have assessed whether these gender differences are due to bias in PTSD measures. Using item response theory, we conducted a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the widely used Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to evaluate whether the instrument demonstrates equivalence when assessing PTSD symptoms among men and women after a major disaster (N=410). Method: We used ordinal logistic regression and item response theory modeling to investigate the presence and impact of DIF across gender groups. Results: One item (“I had waves of strong feelings about the 2011 tornado”) exhibited DIF across the subgroups for men and women. However, the magnitude of the DIF was minimal and did not produce differential measurement error at the total IES-R scale score level. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of measurement equivalence of the IES-R and confirms its usefulness in screening for PTSD across gender groups following a disaster event.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"657 - 676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms After a Disaster: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M. First, Wes Bonifay, J. Houston\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/717263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Although research indicates that women are more likely than men to report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following exposure to a disaster event, few studies have assessed whether these gender differences are due to bias in PTSD measures. Using item response theory, we conducted a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the widely used Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to evaluate whether the instrument demonstrates equivalence when assessing PTSD symptoms among men and women after a major disaster (N=410). Method: We used ordinal logistic regression and item response theory modeling to investigate the presence and impact of DIF across gender groups. Results: One item (“I had waves of strong feelings about the 2011 tornado”) exhibited DIF across the subgroups for men and women. However, the magnitude of the DIF was minimal and did not produce differential measurement error at the total IES-R scale score level. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of measurement equivalence of the IES-R and confirms its usefulness in screening for PTSD across gender groups following a disaster event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"657 - 676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/717263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender Differences in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms After a Disaster: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised
Objective: Although research indicates that women are more likely than men to report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following exposure to a disaster event, few studies have assessed whether these gender differences are due to bias in PTSD measures. Using item response theory, we conducted a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the widely used Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to evaluate whether the instrument demonstrates equivalence when assessing PTSD symptoms among men and women after a major disaster (N=410). Method: We used ordinal logistic regression and item response theory modeling to investigate the presence and impact of DIF across gender groups. Results: One item (“I had waves of strong feelings about the 2011 tornado”) exhibited DIF across the subgroups for men and women. However, the magnitude of the DIF was minimal and did not produce differential measurement error at the total IES-R scale score level. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of measurement equivalence of the IES-R and confirms its usefulness in screening for PTSD across gender groups following a disaster event.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.