IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics Pub Date : 2018-12-24 DOI:10.7203/QF.23.13532
Neus Nogué Serrano
{"title":"L’evolució de la referència als participants en el debat parlamentari en català (1932-2013)","authors":"Neus Nogué Serrano","doi":"10.7203/QF.23.13532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents summarily the first results of a research in progress that aims to study the evolution of the linguistic and discursive strategies used for the reference to participants in the Parliament of Catalonia in the period 1932-38 (during the Spanish Second Republic) and from 1980, the year of the recovery of the Catalan democratic institutions, to 2013. The analysis combines qualitative and quantitative methods and shows several tendencies in the evolution of the use of the different forms and strategies. The incorporation of Goffman (1981)’s participation frameworks to the analysis provides additional data that, once described and interpreted, give a much more accurate answer to the questions set out than the analysis of only person deictic forms and honorifics. And this is relevant not only for parliamentary debates but also for any other speech event with more than two participants.","PeriodicalId":40958,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/QF.23.13532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文概述了一项正在进行的研究的第一个结果,该研究旨在研究1932年至1938年(西班牙第二共和国期间)和1980年(加泰罗尼亚民主机构恢复之年)至2013年期间加泰罗尼亚议会参与者的参考语言和话语策略的演变。该分析结合定性和定量方法,揭示了不同形式和策略的使用演变趋势。将Goffman(1981)的参与框架结合到分析中提供了额外的数据,这些数据一旦被描述和解释,就会比只分析人称指示形式和敬语更准确地回答所提出的问题。这不仅适用于议会辩论,也适用于任何其他有两个以上参与者的演讲活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L’evolució de la referència als participants en el debat parlamentari en català (1932-2013)
This article presents summarily the first results of a research in progress that aims to study the evolution of the linguistic and discursive strategies used for the reference to participants in the Parliament of Catalonia in the period 1932-38 (during the Spanish Second Republic) and from 1980, the year of the recovery of the Catalan democratic institutions, to 2013. The analysis combines qualitative and quantitative methods and shows several tendencies in the evolution of the use of the different forms and strategies. The incorporation of Goffman (1981)’s participation frameworks to the analysis provides additional data that, once described and interpreted, give a much more accurate answer to the questions set out than the analysis of only person deictic forms and honorifics. And this is relevant not only for parliamentary debates but also for any other speech event with more than two participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
¿Es el discurso académico preciso cuando se apoya en la traducción automática? ¿Posedición como propuesta prospectiva? servicios lingüísticos especializados en la formación de traductores La traducción literaria asistida por ordenador aplicada a la novela histórica (alemán-español): entrenamiento y comparación de sistemas de traducción automática “Más bellas y más infieles que nunca”. Usos y percepciones en materia tecnológica entre el profesorado de traducción jurídica de España Perspectivas de la localización de videojuegos: complejidades y problemáticas traductológicas del siglo XXI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1