Viviana Miño, Simón Guendelman, Álvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Carlos Sandaña, S. Quintana
{"title":"依恋类型和人格结构","authors":"Viviana Miño, Simón Guendelman, Álvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Carlos Sandaña, S. Quintana","doi":"10.4172/2167-1044.1000302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several studies have shown that insecure attachment representations play a central role in the psychopathology of personality disorders, however, it is unclear how the adult attachment disorders relate to the personality organization. \nObjective: To evaluate the correlation between secure, dismissing and preoccuppied attachment styles and personality structure, in two samples: a clinic and a control group. \nMethods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample of 27 women hospitalized in a psychiatric unit and a non-clinical sample of 24 women in regular health check. Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO) and the Cartes: Modeles Individuels de Relation (CAMIR) were applied. \nResults: The percentage of secure prototype is lower in the clinical group (14.8% vs. 37.5%). The clinical group showed on average 22 points higher on the IPO. No significant association between attachment style and the three primary scales of the IPO was observed, although the score on these three scales was lower among those with a secure attachment style. People with secure attachment had on average 42 points lower on the OQ-45.2 than the other two groups, a difference that was statistically significant. \nConclusion: Small sample size would not permit the association to be statistically significant. Further research is needed.","PeriodicalId":15532,"journal":{"name":"Journal of depression & anxiety","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attachment Styles and Personality Structure\",\"authors\":\"Viviana Miño, Simón Guendelman, Álvaro Castillo-Carniglia, Carlos Sandaña, S. Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-1044.1000302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Several studies have shown that insecure attachment representations play a central role in the psychopathology of personality disorders, however, it is unclear how the adult attachment disorders relate to the personality organization. \\nObjective: To evaluate the correlation between secure, dismissing and preoccuppied attachment styles and personality structure, in two samples: a clinic and a control group. \\nMethods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample of 27 women hospitalized in a psychiatric unit and a non-clinical sample of 24 women in regular health check. Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO) and the Cartes: Modeles Individuels de Relation (CAMIR) were applied. \\nResults: The percentage of secure prototype is lower in the clinical group (14.8% vs. 37.5%). The clinical group showed on average 22 points higher on the IPO. No significant association between attachment style and the three primary scales of the IPO was observed, although the score on these three scales was lower among those with a secure attachment style. People with secure attachment had on average 42 points lower on the OQ-45.2 than the other two groups, a difference that was statistically significant. \\nConclusion: Small sample size would not permit the association to be statistically significant. Further research is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of depression & anxiety\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of depression & anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1044.1000302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of depression & anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1044.1000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一些研究表明,不安全依恋表征在人格障碍的精神病理中起着核心作用,然而,成人依恋障碍与人格组织的关系尚不清楚。目的:以临床和对照组为研究对象,探讨安全型、回避型和专注型依恋类型与人格结构的关系。方法:一项描述性横断面研究,样本为27名在精神科住院的妇女和24名定期健康检查的非临床样本。运用了人格组织量表(IPO)和个体关系量表(CAMIR)。结果:临床组安全原型比例较低(14.8% vs. 37.5%)。临床组的IPO平均高出22点。依恋类型与IPO的三个主要量表之间没有显著的关联,尽管安全依恋类型的人在这三个量表上的得分较低。安全型依恋的人比其他两组平均低42分,得分为45.2分,这一差异在统计学上是显著的。结论:小样本量不允许这种关联具有统计学意义。需要进一步的研究。
Introduction: Several studies have shown that insecure attachment representations play a central role in the psychopathology of personality disorders, however, it is unclear how the adult attachment disorders relate to the personality organization.
Objective: To evaluate the correlation between secure, dismissing and preoccuppied attachment styles and personality structure, in two samples: a clinic and a control group.
Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample of 27 women hospitalized in a psychiatric unit and a non-clinical sample of 24 women in regular health check. Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO) and the Cartes: Modeles Individuels de Relation (CAMIR) were applied.
Results: The percentage of secure prototype is lower in the clinical group (14.8% vs. 37.5%). The clinical group showed on average 22 points higher on the IPO. No significant association between attachment style and the three primary scales of the IPO was observed, although the score on these three scales was lower among those with a secure attachment style. People with secure attachment had on average 42 points lower on the OQ-45.2 than the other two groups, a difference that was statistically significant.
Conclusion: Small sample size would not permit the association to be statistically significant. Further research is needed.