农业科学技术生产评价乌拉圭新的认证计划

Federico Vasen, M. Sierra, J. Paruelo, C. Negro, Federico Nolla, Joaquín Lapetina, Marcelo Salvagno
{"title":"农业科学技术生产评价乌拉圭新的认证计划","authors":"Federico Vasen, M. Sierra, J. Paruelo, C. Negro, Federico Nolla, Joaquín Lapetina, Marcelo Salvagno","doi":"10.31285/agro.25.491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system.","PeriodicalId":43474,"journal":{"name":"Agrociencia-Uruguay","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of technical production in agricultural sciences a new certification scheme in Uruguay\",\"authors\":\"Federico Vasen, M. Sierra, J. Paruelo, C. Negro, Federico Nolla, Joaquín Lapetina, Marcelo Salvagno\",\"doi\":\"10.31285/agro.25.491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrociencia-Uruguay\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrociencia-Uruguay\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31285/agro.25.491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrociencia-Uruguay","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31285/agro.25.491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

农业科学技术成果的评价提出了具体的挑战。与有标准化评价标准的科学出版物不同,技术发展需要一种更多方面和更有针对性的方法。本文分析了乌拉圭国家农业研究所(INIA)开发的一项技术认证计划。这个过程的目的是根据潜在用户的观点来验证这些发展。基于文献综述和对参与者的访谈,我们回顾了2019年的流程设计和第一轮实施。鉴于研究结果,我们在国家和区域两级报告了这一进程的创新性质。与此同时,我们强调整合各种利益相关者以及优先考虑反馈和学习而不是官僚控制的重要性。最后,我们建议将这一过程与当地科学系统内其他机构中可能存在的类似实例联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of technical production in agricultural sciences a new certification scheme in Uruguay
The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anatolian hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation, processing, and production: history and recent observations Do service crops always involve effective weed management? I Technical Conference of the Plant Protection Group - EEMAC: introduction Problems of pesticide residues in grains Pre-emergent herbicides: benefits and restrictions for rational use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1