地塞米松和依托瑞昔布对阻生第三磨牙手术术后时间的影响——一项随机临床试验

É. Rodrigues, Gabriela Soares Pereira, B. Vasconcelos, R. D. C. Ribeiro
{"title":"地塞米松和依托瑞昔布对阻生第三磨牙手术术后时间的影响——一项随机临床试验","authors":"É. Rodrigues, Gabriela Soares Pereira, B. Vasconcelos, R. D. C. Ribeiro","doi":"10.4317/medoral.23095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The aim of this study was to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone and etoricoxib after third molar extraction. Material and Methods A prospective, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study was conducted. 19 volunteers were allocated randomly to receive 90mg etoricoxib 1 hour prior to the procedure or 4mg intramuscular dexamethasone immediately after anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained preoperatively, and subsequent assessments were made on immediate postoperative, at 72 hours and 7 days after surgery to measure postoperative facial swelling by use of linear measurements, interincisal mouth opening width and visual analog scale score for pain. The amount of analgesics consumed was recorded. Descriptive statistics and the independent-samples t-test were used to compare the two groups at P < 0.05. Results Dexamethasone was effective in the control roasted edema for measurements of the mandibular angle - wing of the nose and mandibular angle - labial commissure 72 hours after surgery. And for the measurement mandibular angle - mentum, in the time of 72 hours and 7 days. There was no statistically significant difference in relation to pain and trismus. Conclusions Considering significant results for some measures of the variable edema for the group that used intramuscular dexamethasone and the difference without statistical significance between groups for the other variables studied, we seem to reflect the intramuscular indication of the corticosteroid in a single dosage in relation to the use of etoricoxib as pre-emptive medication. Key words:Corticosteroids, COX-2 selective, third-molar surgery.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"11 1","pages":"e746 - e751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of preemptive dexamethasone and etoricoxib on postoperative period following impacted third molar surgery - a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"É. Rodrigues, Gabriela Soares Pereira, B. Vasconcelos, R. D. C. Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/medoral.23095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The aim of this study was to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone and etoricoxib after third molar extraction. Material and Methods A prospective, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study was conducted. 19 volunteers were allocated randomly to receive 90mg etoricoxib 1 hour prior to the procedure or 4mg intramuscular dexamethasone immediately after anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained preoperatively, and subsequent assessments were made on immediate postoperative, at 72 hours and 7 days after surgery to measure postoperative facial swelling by use of linear measurements, interincisal mouth opening width and visual analog scale score for pain. The amount of analgesics consumed was recorded. Descriptive statistics and the independent-samples t-test were used to compare the two groups at P < 0.05. Results Dexamethasone was effective in the control roasted edema for measurements of the mandibular angle - wing of the nose and mandibular angle - labial commissure 72 hours after surgery. And for the measurement mandibular angle - mentum, in the time of 72 hours and 7 days. There was no statistically significant difference in relation to pain and trismus. Conclusions Considering significant results for some measures of the variable edema for the group that used intramuscular dexamethasone and the difference without statistical significance between groups for the other variables studied, we seem to reflect the intramuscular indication of the corticosteroid in a single dosage in relation to the use of etoricoxib as pre-emptive medication. Key words:Corticosteroids, COX-2 selective, third-molar surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e746 - e751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究的目的是比较地塞米松和依托昔布在第三磨牙拔牙后的抗炎作用。材料与方法采用前瞻性、随机对照、裂口法研究。19名志愿者被随机分配,在手术前1小时接受90mg依托瑞昔布,麻醉后立即接受4mg肌注地塞米松。术前进行基线测量,术后即刻、术后72小时和术后7天进行后续评估,使用线性测量、内切口张开宽度和视觉模拟疼痛评分来测量术后面部肿胀。记录镇痛药的用量。两组比较采用描述性统计和独立样本t检验,P < 0.05。结果地塞米松对术后72 h的下颌角-鼻翼和下颌角-唇连度测量均有较好的控制作用。并在72小时和7天的时间内测量下颌角动量。两组在疼痛和牙关咬合方面无统计学差异。考虑到肌注地塞米松组的一些变量水肿测量结果显著,而其他变量研究组间差异无统计学意义,我们似乎反映了单剂量皮质类固醇的肌注适应证与使用依托昔布作为预防性用药的关系。关键词:皮质类固醇,COX-2选择性,第三磨牙手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of preemptive dexamethasone and etoricoxib on postoperative period following impacted third molar surgery - a randomized clinical trial
Background The aim of this study was to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone and etoricoxib after third molar extraction. Material and Methods A prospective, randomized, controlled, split-mouth study was conducted. 19 volunteers were allocated randomly to receive 90mg etoricoxib 1 hour prior to the procedure or 4mg intramuscular dexamethasone immediately after anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained preoperatively, and subsequent assessments were made on immediate postoperative, at 72 hours and 7 days after surgery to measure postoperative facial swelling by use of linear measurements, interincisal mouth opening width and visual analog scale score for pain. The amount of analgesics consumed was recorded. Descriptive statistics and the independent-samples t-test were used to compare the two groups at P < 0.05. Results Dexamethasone was effective in the control roasted edema for measurements of the mandibular angle - wing of the nose and mandibular angle - labial commissure 72 hours after surgery. And for the measurement mandibular angle - mentum, in the time of 72 hours and 7 days. There was no statistically significant difference in relation to pain and trismus. Conclusions Considering significant results for some measures of the variable edema for the group that used intramuscular dexamethasone and the difference without statistical significance between groups for the other variables studied, we seem to reflect the intramuscular indication of the corticosteroid in a single dosage in relation to the use of etoricoxib as pre-emptive medication. Key words:Corticosteroids, COX-2 selective, third-molar surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actinic cheilitis: Proposal of a clinical index Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the orthognathic quality of life questionnaire in patients with dentofacial deformity Endoscopic findings in periapical surgery. A cross-sectional study of 206 roots Ameloblastomas mimicking apical periodontitis: a case series Influence of root width and dentin wall thickness evaluated by endoscopy upon the outcome of periapical surgery. A cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1