教育背景下的逻辑思维

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.54615/2231-7805.47227
José Roque Luna-Guevara, Fernando Silva, Oscar López-Regalado
{"title":"教育背景下的逻辑思维","authors":"José Roque Luna-Guevara, Fernando Silva, Oscar López-Regalado","doi":"10.54615/2231-7805.47227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, having skills to solve the various difficulties of everyday existence using logical reason, is very significant; also, towards the progress of science and technology; the result of research on the logical judgment of students is shown. The objective is to analyse the present phase of scientific discernment on logical thinking in the formative reality in the period 2016 to 2021. The methodology was based on the systematic review, using a quantitative, retrospective approach; non-experimental design, cross-sectional and retrospective type; the inquiry of information has been executed in prestigious databases; the descriptive results show that the definition of logical thinking has been evolving according to the development of technology which is a very influential factor; finally it was concluded that logical thinking is the solvency to solve difficulties, the logical and scientific do not exist if they are not related. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 22(10), December 2021: 1-11.","PeriodicalId":43558,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LOGICAL THINKING IN THE EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT\",\"authors\":\"José Roque Luna-Guevara, Fernando Silva, Oscar López-Regalado\",\"doi\":\"10.54615/2231-7805.47227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, having skills to solve the various difficulties of everyday existence using logical reason, is very significant; also, towards the progress of science and technology; the result of research on the logical judgment of students is shown. The objective is to analyse the present phase of scientific discernment on logical thinking in the formative reality in the period 2016 to 2021. The methodology was based on the systematic review, using a quantitative, retrospective approach; non-experimental design, cross-sectional and retrospective type; the inquiry of information has been executed in prestigious databases; the descriptive results show that the definition of logical thinking has been evolving according to the development of technology which is a very influential factor; finally it was concluded that logical thinking is the solvency to solve difficulties, the logical and scientific do not exist if they are not related. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 22(10), December 2021: 1-11.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54615/2231-7805.47227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54615/2231-7805.47227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,具备运用逻辑推理解决日常存在的各种困难的技能,是非常重要的;同时,向着科学技术的进步;给出了对学生逻辑判断能力的研究结果。目的是分析2016年至2021年形成现实中逻辑思维科学辨析的现状。研究方法以系统评价为基础,采用定量、回顾性方法;非实验设计,横断面和回顾性设计;资料查询已在著名的数据库中进行;描述性结果表明,逻辑思维的定义一直在随着技术的发展而演变,这是一个非常有影响的因素;最后得出结论:逻辑思维是解决困难的偿付能力,逻辑性与科学性不相联系就不存在。东盟精神病学杂志,Vol. 22(10), 2021年12月:1-11。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LOGICAL THINKING IN THE EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT
At present, having skills to solve the various difficulties of everyday existence using logical reason, is very significant; also, towards the progress of science and technology; the result of research on the logical judgment of students is shown. The objective is to analyse the present phase of scientific discernment on logical thinking in the formative reality in the period 2016 to 2021. The methodology was based on the systematic review, using a quantitative, retrospective approach; non-experimental design, cross-sectional and retrospective type; the inquiry of information has been executed in prestigious databases; the descriptive results show that the definition of logical thinking has been evolving according to the development of technology which is a very influential factor; finally it was concluded that logical thinking is the solvency to solve difficulties, the logical and scientific do not exist if they are not related. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 22(10), December 2021: 1-11.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Assess the Level of Stress among the Staff Nurse Working in Saveetha Medical College and Hospital during Covid-19 Pandemic ASSESSMENT OF STRESS AMONG SECOND YEAR STUDENTS AT MICHAEL CHILUFYA SATA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON OLDER ADULTS' FINANCES, WELL-BEING AND FEAR DEPRESSION AS THE ONLY ACUTE MANIFESTATION OF A THALAMIC STROKE: CASE REPORT THE INFLUENCE OF TRAIT ANXIETY ON CAREER SELF-MANAGEMENT AND THE MODERATOR EFFECT OF STATE ANXIETY ABOUT LAYOFFS DUE TO COVID 19 PANDEMIC AMONG WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1