职业发展:专业与否?

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Australian Journal of Career Development Pub Date : 2020-06-22 DOI:10.1177/1038416219898548
Val O’Reilly, M. McMahon, Polly Parker
{"title":"职业发展:专业与否?","authors":"Val O’Reilly, M. McMahon, Polly Parker","doi":"10.1177/1038416219898548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professions are recognised occupations that require specialised knowledge, training, and skills. Entry into professions is gained through high level qualifications, such as university degrees. The theoretical knowledge base and profession-specific qualifications distinguish professions from other occupations and create a unique identity for them and their members. Professions have defined entry pathways that assist members who practise in the field (practitioners) to construct their professional identity. Governments regulate entry to some professions, such as teaching and psychology. Career development lacks the regulation of other professions and the entry pathway is less defined. This article considers the professional status of career development against a critical reflection on professions, professionalism and professionalisation, and professional identity construction. Potential implications of the differences between career development and other professions related to professional standards and regulation are discussed and questions posed about the construction of a professional identity for the field and its members.","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"30 1","pages":"79 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Career development: Profession or not?\",\"authors\":\"Val O’Reilly, M. McMahon, Polly Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1038416219898548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professions are recognised occupations that require specialised knowledge, training, and skills. Entry into professions is gained through high level qualifications, such as university degrees. The theoretical knowledge base and profession-specific qualifications distinguish professions from other occupations and create a unique identity for them and their members. Professions have defined entry pathways that assist members who practise in the field (practitioners) to construct their professional identity. Governments regulate entry to some professions, such as teaching and psychology. Career development lacks the regulation of other professions and the entry pathway is less defined. This article considers the professional status of career development against a critical reflection on professions, professionalism and professionalisation, and professional identity construction. Potential implications of the differences between career development and other professions related to professional standards and regulation are discussed and questions posed about the construction of a professional identity for the field and its members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Career Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219898548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219898548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

职业是公认的需要专业知识、培训和技能的职业。进入专业领域需要具备高水平的资格,比如大学学位。理论知识基础和专业特定资格将专业与其他职业区分开来,并为他们及其成员创造了独特的身份。专业已经定义了进入途径,帮助在该领域实践的成员(从业者)构建他们的职业身份。政府对某些职业的进入有规定,比如教师和心理学。职业发展缺乏其他职业的规范,进入途径也不明确。本文通过对专业、专业主义与专业化、职业认同构建等问题的批判性反思来思考职业发展的专业地位。讨论了职业发展与与专业标准和规范有关的其他专业之间的差异的潜在影响,并提出了有关为该领域及其成员建立专业身份的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Career development: Profession or not?
Professions are recognised occupations that require specialised knowledge, training, and skills. Entry into professions is gained through high level qualifications, such as university degrees. The theoretical knowledge base and profession-specific qualifications distinguish professions from other occupations and create a unique identity for them and their members. Professions have defined entry pathways that assist members who practise in the field (practitioners) to construct their professional identity. Governments regulate entry to some professions, such as teaching and psychology. Career development lacks the regulation of other professions and the entry pathway is less defined. This article considers the professional status of career development against a critical reflection on professions, professionalism and professionalisation, and professional identity construction. Potential implications of the differences between career development and other professions related to professional standards and regulation are discussed and questions posed about the construction of a professional identity for the field and its members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo. The relationship between living in regional, remote and rural areas and post-school outcomes: A scoping review Exploratory actions as mediators of the association between career exploration self-efficacy and decisional outcomes: Does exploration type matter? ‘Careering’ – toward radicalism in radical times: Links to human security and sustainable livelihoods Understanding the transition from psychology graduate to post-graduate counselling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1