口腔癌术后放疗前后患者最大开口的比较研究

A. Bhanja, D. D'Souza, Piyali Poddar, Collin Roy, R. Poddar
{"title":"口腔癌术后放疗前后患者最大开口的比较研究","authors":"A. Bhanja, D. D'Souza, Piyali Poddar, Collin Roy, R. Poddar","doi":"10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Restricted mouth opening is a long-term sequelae of head neck cancer treatment. This is a major concern as it leads to multiple problems in maintenance of oral hygiene, speech, chewing, swallowing, prosthetic rehabilitation, and follow-up intra-oral examination. In this study, our aim was to assess maximum mouth opening (MMO) amongst postoperative oral cancer patients with or without conventional radiotherapy over a period of one year. Material and methods: A prospective longitudinal study was done in oral cancer patients, within three years, to compare effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) on MMO over a follow-up period of one year with control of post-operative cases without radiation. Level of significance was set at alpha level 0.05. Results: Among 18 patients of PORT and 19 patients of control group, repeated measure ANOVA were significant for the following parameters: within subject effect in each group; between subject effect and interaction effect of month and radiation. Multiple pairwise comparison showed MMO at 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month were significantly different in PORT group, in comparison to preoperative MMO. In the control group however, only postoperative MMO at 1st month was significantly different. After one-year, mean MMO, in PORT and control was 32.56±4.29mm and 46.37±4.65mm, respectively and total trismus in radiotherapy group was 66.67% and that of control group was nil. Conclusion: Conventional radiotherapy in oral cancer patients can lead to high rate of trismus as a late effect. Strict exercise protocol along with close monitoring is recommended to have beneficial effect to the patients.","PeriodicalId":13918,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Maximum Mouth Opening amongst Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients with or without Radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhanja, D. D'Souza, Piyali Poddar, Collin Roy, R. Poddar\",\"doi\":\"10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Restricted mouth opening is a long-term sequelae of head neck cancer treatment. This is a major concern as it leads to multiple problems in maintenance of oral hygiene, speech, chewing, swallowing, prosthetic rehabilitation, and follow-up intra-oral examination. In this study, our aim was to assess maximum mouth opening (MMO) amongst postoperative oral cancer patients with or without conventional radiotherapy over a period of one year. Material and methods: A prospective longitudinal study was done in oral cancer patients, within three years, to compare effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) on MMO over a follow-up period of one year with control of post-operative cases without radiation. Level of significance was set at alpha level 0.05. Results: Among 18 patients of PORT and 19 patients of control group, repeated measure ANOVA were significant for the following parameters: within subject effect in each group; between subject effect and interaction effect of month and radiation. Multiple pairwise comparison showed MMO at 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month were significantly different in PORT group, in comparison to preoperative MMO. In the control group however, only postoperative MMO at 1st month was significantly different. After one-year, mean MMO, in PORT and control was 32.56±4.29mm and 46.37±4.65mm, respectively and total trismus in radiotherapy group was 66.67% and that of control group was nil. Conclusion: Conventional radiotherapy in oral cancer patients can lead to high rate of trismus as a late effect. Strict exercise protocol along with close monitoring is recommended to have beneficial effect to the patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2020.7.6.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:限制开口是头颈癌治疗的长期后遗症。这是一个主要问题,因为它会导致维持口腔卫生、言语、咀嚼、吞咽、假肢康复和后续口腔内检查等多种问题。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估一年内接受或不接受常规放疗的口腔癌术后患者的最大开口(MMO)。材料和方法:对口腔癌患者进行了一项前瞻性纵向研究,在三年的时间内,比较术后放疗(PORT)对MMO的影响,随访一年,对照组为术后未放疗病例。显著性水平设为α水平0.05。结果:PORT组18例患者与对照组19例患者中,重复测量方差分析(repeated measure ANOVA)在以下参数上均有显著性差异:组内效应;月与辐射的主体效应与交互效应之间的关系。多组两两比较显示,PORT组第3、6、9、12个月的MMO与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义。而在对照组中,只有术后第1个月的MMO有显著差异。术后1年,PORT组和对照组的平均咬合度分别为32.56±4.29mm和46.37±4.65mm,放疗组的总咬合度为66.67%,对照组为零。结论:常规放疗对口腔癌患者的晚期效果是高牙关率。建议严格的运动方案和密切的监测对患者有有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of Maximum Mouth Opening amongst Postoperative Oral Cancer Patients with or without Radiotherapy
Introduction: Restricted mouth opening is a long-term sequelae of head neck cancer treatment. This is a major concern as it leads to multiple problems in maintenance of oral hygiene, speech, chewing, swallowing, prosthetic rehabilitation, and follow-up intra-oral examination. In this study, our aim was to assess maximum mouth opening (MMO) amongst postoperative oral cancer patients with or without conventional radiotherapy over a period of one year. Material and methods: A prospective longitudinal study was done in oral cancer patients, within three years, to compare effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) on MMO over a follow-up period of one year with control of post-operative cases without radiation. Level of significance was set at alpha level 0.05. Results: Among 18 patients of PORT and 19 patients of control group, repeated measure ANOVA were significant for the following parameters: within subject effect in each group; between subject effect and interaction effect of month and radiation. Multiple pairwise comparison showed MMO at 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month were significantly different in PORT group, in comparison to preoperative MMO. In the control group however, only postoperative MMO at 1st month was significantly different. After one-year, mean MMO, in PORT and control was 32.56±4.29mm and 46.37±4.65mm, respectively and total trismus in radiotherapy group was 66.67% and that of control group was nil. Conclusion: Conventional radiotherapy in oral cancer patients can lead to high rate of trismus as a late effect. Strict exercise protocol along with close monitoring is recommended to have beneficial effect to the patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease Outcomes of Surgical Management of Floating Knee Injuries Hyperventilation Syndrome Foreign Body in Maxillary Deciduous First Molar – A Case Report ​ Screening for Peripheral Vascular Disease among Type 2 Diabetes Patients of Lower Socio Economic Status using Ankle Brachial Index - A Descriptive Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1