具有双重监督的个性化文档聚类

Yeming Hu, E. Milios, J. Blustein, Shali Liu
{"title":"具有双重监督的个性化文档聚类","authors":"Yeming Hu, E. Milios, J. Blustein, Shali Liu","doi":"10.1145/2361354.2361393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential for semi-supervised techniques to produce personalized clusters has not been explored. This is due to the fact that semi-supervised clustering algorithms used to be evaluated using oracles based on underlying class labels. Although using oracles allows clustering algorithms to be evaluated quickly and without labor intensive labeling, it has the key disadvantage that oracles always give the same answer for an assignment of a document or a feature. However, different human users might give different assignments of the same document and/or feature because of different but equally valid points of view. In this paper, we conduct a user study in which we ask participants (users) to group the same document collection into clusters according to their own understanding, which are then used to evaluate semi-supervised clustering algorithms for user personalization. Through our user study, we observe that different users have their own personalized organizations of the same collection and a user's organization changes over time. Therefore, we propose that document clustering algorithms should be able to incorporate user input and produce personalized clusters based on the user input. We also confirm that semi-supervised algorithms with noisy user input can still produce better organizations matching user's expectation (personalization) than traditional unsupervised ones. Finally, we demonstrate that labeling keywords for clusters at the same time as labeling documents can improve clustering performance further compared to labeling only documents with respect to user personalization.","PeriodicalId":91385,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"59 Pt A 1","pages":"161-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized document clustering with dual supervision\",\"authors\":\"Yeming Hu, E. Milios, J. Blustein, Shali Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2361354.2361393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The potential for semi-supervised techniques to produce personalized clusters has not been explored. This is due to the fact that semi-supervised clustering algorithms used to be evaluated using oracles based on underlying class labels. Although using oracles allows clustering algorithms to be evaluated quickly and without labor intensive labeling, it has the key disadvantage that oracles always give the same answer for an assignment of a document or a feature. However, different human users might give different assignments of the same document and/or feature because of different but equally valid points of view. In this paper, we conduct a user study in which we ask participants (users) to group the same document collection into clusters according to their own understanding, which are then used to evaluate semi-supervised clustering algorithms for user personalization. Through our user study, we observe that different users have their own personalized organizations of the same collection and a user's organization changes over time. Therefore, we propose that document clustering algorithms should be able to incorporate user input and produce personalized clusters based on the user input. We also confirm that semi-supervised algorithms with noisy user input can still produce better organizations matching user's expectation (personalization) than traditional unsupervised ones. Finally, we demonstrate that labeling keywords for clusters at the same time as labeling documents can improve clustering performance further compared to labeling only documents with respect to user personalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"59 Pt A 1\",\"pages\":\"161-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2361354.2361393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2361354.2361393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

半监督技术产生个性化集群的潜力尚未得到探索。这是因为半监督聚类算法过去是使用基于底层类标签的oracle来评估的。虽然使用oracle可以快速评估聚类算法,并且不需要耗费大量劳动的标记,但它有一个关键的缺点,即对于文档或特征的分配,oracle总是给出相同的答案。然而,不同的人类用户可能会因为不同但同样有效的观点而对同一文档和/或特性给出不同的分配。在本文中,我们进行了一项用户研究,我们要求参与者(用户)根据自己的理解将相同的文档集合分组,然后使用这些分组来评估用户个性化的半监督聚类算法。通过我们的用户研究,我们观察到不同的用户对相同的收藏有自己的个性化组织,并且用户的组织随时间而变化。因此,我们建议文档聚类算法应该能够结合用户输入并基于用户输入生成个性化的聚类。我们还证实,与传统的无监督算法相比,带有噪声用户输入的半监督算法仍然可以产生更好的匹配用户期望(个性化)的组织。最后,我们证明了在标记文档的同时标记聚类的关键字可以进一步提高聚类性能,而不仅仅是标记用户个性化的文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personalized document clustering with dual supervision
The potential for semi-supervised techniques to produce personalized clusters has not been explored. This is due to the fact that semi-supervised clustering algorithms used to be evaluated using oracles based on underlying class labels. Although using oracles allows clustering algorithms to be evaluated quickly and without labor intensive labeling, it has the key disadvantage that oracles always give the same answer for an assignment of a document or a feature. However, different human users might give different assignments of the same document and/or feature because of different but equally valid points of view. In this paper, we conduct a user study in which we ask participants (users) to group the same document collection into clusters according to their own understanding, which are then used to evaluate semi-supervised clustering algorithms for user personalization. Through our user study, we observe that different users have their own personalized organizations of the same collection and a user's organization changes over time. Therefore, we propose that document clustering algorithms should be able to incorporate user input and produce personalized clusters based on the user input. We also confirm that semi-supervised algorithms with noisy user input can still produce better organizations matching user's expectation (personalization) than traditional unsupervised ones. Finally, we demonstrate that labeling keywords for clusters at the same time as labeling documents can improve clustering performance further compared to labeling only documents with respect to user personalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Notarial Archives, Valletta: Starting from Zero Truncation: all the news that fits we'll print Classifying and ranking search engine results as potential sources of plagiarism An ensemble approach for text document clustering using Wikipedia concepts Document changes: modeling, detection, storage and visualization (DChanges 2014)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1