致癌物风险评估:ACGIH和EPA方法的比较

M. Alavanja, Charles C. Brown, R. Spirtas, Manuel R. Gómez
{"title":"致癌物风险评估:ACGIH和EPA方法的比较","authors":"M. Alavanja, Charles C. Brown, R. Spirtas, Manuel R. Gómez","doi":"10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relative carcinogenic potency of 16 chemicals evaluated by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values (CS-TLV) Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) were compared. The estimated cancer risk resulting from occupational exposure to the threshold limit values (TLVs) were also computed using dose-response curves developed as a part of EPA quantitative risk assessments. Substantial agreement between the EPA and the CS-TLV Committee was found when the relative potency of these carcinogens was compared. Use of EPA's risk model to estimate lifetime cancer risk from occupational exposure at the TLV levels often resulted in high cancer risk estimates. The approaches used to assess cancer risk by both groups is described and a suggestion is made for incorporating existing quantitative risk assessments into the TLV evaluation procedure.","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"190 1","pages":"510-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA\",\"authors\":\"M. Alavanja, Charles C. Brown, R. Spirtas, Manuel R. Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The relative carcinogenic potency of 16 chemicals evaluated by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values (CS-TLV) Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) were compared. The estimated cancer risk resulting from occupational exposure to the threshold limit values (TLVs) were also computed using dose-response curves developed as a part of EPA quantitative risk assessments. Substantial agreement between the EPA and the CS-TLV Committee was found when the relative potency of these carcinogens was compared. Use of EPA's risk model to estimate lifetime cancer risk from occupational exposure at the TLV levels often resulted in high cancer risk estimates. The approaches used to assess cancer risk by both groups is described and a suggestion is made for incorporating existing quantitative risk assessments into the TLV evaluation procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene\",\"volume\":\"190 1\",\"pages\":\"510-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要比较了美国环境保护署(EPA)和美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)化学物质阈值委员会(CS-TLV)评估的16种化学物质的相对致癌效力。职业暴露于阈限值(TLVs)导致的估计癌症风险也使用作为EPA定量风险评估的一部分制定的剂量-反应曲线进行计算。当比较这些致癌物的相对效力时,发现EPA和CS-TLV委员会之间存在实质性的一致。使用EPA的风险模型来估计职业暴露在TLV水平下的终生癌症风险通常会导致高癌症风险估计。描述了两组用于评估癌症风险的方法,并建议将现有的定量风险评估纳入TLV评估程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA
Abstract The relative carcinogenic potency of 16 chemicals evaluated by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values (CS-TLV) Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) were compared. The estimated cancer risk resulting from occupational exposure to the threshold limit values (TLVs) were also computed using dose-response curves developed as a part of EPA quantitative risk assessments. Substantial agreement between the EPA and the CS-TLV Committee was found when the relative potency of these carcinogens was compared. Use of EPA's risk model to estimate lifetime cancer risk from occupational exposure at the TLV levels often resulted in high cancer risk estimates. The approaches used to assess cancer risk by both groups is described and a suggestion is made for incorporating existing quantitative risk assessments into the TLV evaluation procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Field Evaluation of Mandelic Acid in Urine as a Compliance Monitor for Styrene Exposure The Impact of Boundary Layer Separation on Local Exhaust Design and Worker Exposure Air-Lead Particle Sizes in Battery Manufacturing: Potential Effects on the OSHA Compliance Model Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA Industrial Ventilation News Digest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1