第二次工业革命期间的贬值:英国自行车和汽车工业,约1896 -约1922

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Accounting History Review Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21552851.2021.1922123
T. Boyns
{"title":"第二次工业革命期间的贬值:英国自行车和汽车工业,约1896 -约1922","authors":"T. Boyns","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2021.1922123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines the approach to depreciation adopted by companies engaged in two light engineering industries associated with the second industrial revolution: the cycle and motor vehicle industries. Through an examination of the published accounts of 21 companies engaged in these sectors at some time during the study period, and the archival records of two of them (Birmingham Small Arms and Daimler), this study examines the extent to which firm depreciation practices differed from those in more traditional sectors (iron and steel, coal, transport) previously examined by historians. It is found that depreciation was applied more regularly and, at least in some cases, according to set rates and using sophisticated systems. Nevertheless, the depreciation practices of firms, especially in the motor vehicle sector, have been deemed to render net profit figures unusable as a means of comparing business performance before the introduction of new legal requirements relating to financial reporting introduced by the 1928 Companies Act.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"73 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depreciation during the second industrial revolution: the British cycle and motor vehicle industries, c.1896–c.1922\",\"authors\":\"T. Boyns\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21552851.2021.1922123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study examines the approach to depreciation adopted by companies engaged in two light engineering industries associated with the second industrial revolution: the cycle and motor vehicle industries. Through an examination of the published accounts of 21 companies engaged in these sectors at some time during the study period, and the archival records of two of them (Birmingham Small Arms and Daimler), this study examines the extent to which firm depreciation practices differed from those in more traditional sectors (iron and steel, coal, transport) previously examined by historians. It is found that depreciation was applied more regularly and, at least in some cases, according to set rates and using sophisticated systems. Nevertheless, the depreciation practices of firms, especially in the motor vehicle sector, have been deemed to render net profit figures unusable as a means of comparing business performance before the introduction of new legal requirements relating to financial reporting introduced by the 1928 Companies Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting History Review\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2021.1922123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2021.1922123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究考察了与第二次工业革命相关的两个轻工行业:自行车和汽车行业的公司采用的折旧方法。通过对研究期间从事这些行业的21家公司的公开账目,以及其中两家公司(伯明翰轻武器公司和戴姆勒公司)的档案记录的检查,本研究检验了企业折旧做法与历史学家先前研究过的更传统行业(钢铁、煤炭、运输)的不同程度。研究发现,折旧的应用更有规律,至少在某些情况下,是根据既定的汇率和使用复杂的系统。然而,在1928年《公司法》引入与财务报告有关的新法律要求之前,公司的折旧做法,特别是在机动车辆部门,被认为无法将净利润数字用作比较业务业绩的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depreciation during the second industrial revolution: the British cycle and motor vehicle industries, c.1896–c.1922
ABSTRACT This study examines the approach to depreciation adopted by companies engaged in two light engineering industries associated with the second industrial revolution: the cycle and motor vehicle industries. Through an examination of the published accounts of 21 companies engaged in these sectors at some time during the study period, and the archival records of two of them (Birmingham Small Arms and Daimler), this study examines the extent to which firm depreciation practices differed from those in more traditional sectors (iron and steel, coal, transport) previously examined by historians. It is found that depreciation was applied more regularly and, at least in some cases, according to set rates and using sophisticated systems. Nevertheless, the depreciation practices of firms, especially in the motor vehicle sector, have been deemed to render net profit figures unusable as a means of comparing business performance before the introduction of new legal requirements relating to financial reporting introduced by the 1928 Companies Act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Accounting for sustainability in water supply: the case of the ‘Bottini Aqueduct’ in medieval times ‘American Bookkeeping’ in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries which was not American ‘Accounting for the Music’. Institutional logics in the Regio Teatro Carolino of Palermo at the beginning of the nineteenth century Reflections from the Editor’s Desk Measuring profit and performance, a cautionary tale: Birmingham Small Arms c.1911–c.1936
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1