边坡修复方法推荐的早期多准则决策支持系统

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699
I. Adhikari, A. Baral, E. Zahed, B. Abediniangerabi, M. Shahandashti
{"title":"边坡修复方法推荐的早期多准则决策支持系统","authors":"I. Adhikari, A. Baral, E. Zahed, B. Abediniangerabi, M. Shahandashti","doi":"10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The selection of appropriate slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes is challenging at the early-stage of the decision-making process due to the limited available geotechnical information. At this early-stage, the limited experience of a few maintenance personnel often dominates the selection of slope repair methods to restore failed slopes. Hence, some potential repair methods that may have better performance for the given slope conditions, could be overlooked. The objective of this study is to develop an early-stage multi-criteria decision-support system to rank and recommend slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes based on collective experience and knowledge of subject matter experts. This system evaluates potential slope repair methods based on several selection criteria, such as the impact on traffic, the service life of repair methods, the rapidity of repair to recommend the most appropriate repair methods for the slope restoration. A survey of subject matter experts was conducted to identify the possible slope repair methods. The importance of selection criteria was calculated using the entropy method. The resulting importance of criteria was then used by the technique for order preference by the similarity of ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank and recommend potential slope repair methods.","PeriodicalId":50689,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","volume":"64 1","pages":"127 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early stage multi-criteria decision support system for recommending slope repair methods\",\"authors\":\"I. Adhikari, A. Baral, E. Zahed, B. Abediniangerabi, M. Shahandashti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The selection of appropriate slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes is challenging at the early-stage of the decision-making process due to the limited available geotechnical information. At this early-stage, the limited experience of a few maintenance personnel often dominates the selection of slope repair methods to restore failed slopes. Hence, some potential repair methods that may have better performance for the given slope conditions, could be overlooked. The objective of this study is to develop an early-stage multi-criteria decision-support system to rank and recommend slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes based on collective experience and knowledge of subject matter experts. This system evaluates potential slope repair methods based on several selection criteria, such as the impact on traffic, the service life of repair methods, the rapidity of repair to recommend the most appropriate repair methods for the slope restoration. A survey of subject matter experts was conducted to identify the possible slope repair methods. The importance of selection criteria was calculated using the entropy method. The resulting importance of criteria was then used by the technique for order preference by the similarity of ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank and recommend potential slope repair methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2021.1923699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由于可用的岩土工程信息有限,在决策过程的早期阶段,选择适当的边坡修复方法来恢复破坏的边坡是具有挑战性的。在这个早期阶段,少数维修人员的有限经验往往主导了边坡修复方法的选择,以恢复破坏的边坡。因此,一些潜在的修复方法可能对给定的边坡条件有更好的性能,可能被忽视。本研究的目的是开发一个早期的多标准决策支持系统,根据主题专家的集体经验和知识,对边坡修复方法进行排序和推荐。该系统根据对交通的影响、修复方法的使用寿命、修复的快速性等几个选择标准,对潜在的边坡修复方法进行评估,推荐最适合边坡修复的修复方法。对主题专家进行了调查,以确定可能的边坡修复方法。采用熵值法计算选择准则的重要度。然后,通过理想解决方案的相似性(TOPSIS)对潜在的边坡修复方法进行排序和推荐,从而使用标准的重要性进行排序偏好技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early stage multi-criteria decision support system for recommending slope repair methods
ABSTRACT The selection of appropriate slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes is challenging at the early-stage of the decision-making process due to the limited available geotechnical information. At this early-stage, the limited experience of a few maintenance personnel often dominates the selection of slope repair methods to restore failed slopes. Hence, some potential repair methods that may have better performance for the given slope conditions, could be overlooked. The objective of this study is to develop an early-stage multi-criteria decision-support system to rank and recommend slope repair methods for the restoration of failed slopes based on collective experience and knowledge of subject matter experts. This system evaluates potential slope repair methods based on several selection criteria, such as the impact on traffic, the service life of repair methods, the rapidity of repair to recommend the most appropriate repair methods for the slope restoration. A survey of subject matter experts was conducted to identify the possible slope repair methods. The importance of selection criteria was calculated using the entropy method. The resulting importance of criteria was then used by the technique for order preference by the similarity of ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank and recommend potential slope repair methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems is devoted to the advancement of systems thinking and systems techniques throughout systems engineering, environmental engineering decision-making, and engineering management. We do this by publishing the practical applications and developments of "hard" and "soft" systems techniques and thinking. Submissions that allow for better analysis of civil engineering and environmental systems might look at: -Civil Engineering optimization -Risk assessment in engineering -Civil engineering decision analysis -System identification in engineering -Civil engineering numerical simulation -Uncertainty modelling in engineering -Qualitative modelling of complex engineering systems
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of stochastic finite element analyses for the safety assessment of unreinforced masonry shear walls Investigating the influencing parameters with automated scour severity detection using Bayesian neural networks Celebrating 40 years of the CEES journal Carbon footprint assessment of maintenance and rehabilitation techniques for sewer systems Systems methods and real world practice – Paul Jowitt’s pilgrimage in his writings for this journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1