恩格列净治疗保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者——系统评价

{"title":"恩格列净治疗保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者——系统评价","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/coa.08.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The goal of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of empagliflozin in managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as compared with a placebo. Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for articles from 2000 to November 2022. Reference lists of articles were manually screened. Trials that recruited patients with HFpEF and reported the effects of empagliflozin were included. Endnote X9 software was used for study screening process. Results: 14 papers out of 1235 found were selected for full-text reviews. The systematic review included nine papers that were all randomized controlled trials. According to the findings of individual trials, empagliflozin is more effective and has a statistically insignificant safety advantage over a placebo. Conclusion: Empagliflozin treatment for HFpEF patients appears to be both safe and efficient when compared to a placebo, according to data of moderate quality","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empagliflozin Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/coa.08.01.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The goal of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of empagliflozin in managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as compared with a placebo. Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for articles from 2000 to November 2022. Reference lists of articles were manually screened. Trials that recruited patients with HFpEF and reported the effects of empagliflozin were included. Endnote X9 software was used for study screening process. Results: 14 papers out of 1235 found were selected for full-text reviews. The systematic review included nine papers that were all randomized controlled trials. According to the findings of individual trials, empagliflozin is more effective and has a statistically insignificant safety advantage over a placebo. Conclusion: Empagliflozin treatment for HFpEF patients appears to be both safe and efficient when compared to a placebo, according to data of moderate quality\",\"PeriodicalId\":93027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/coa.08.01.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/coa.08.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统评价的目的是确定与安慰剂相比,恩格列净治疗保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者的有效性。方法:检索Web of Science、Cochrane、PubMed和Scopus数据库2000年至2022年11月的文章。参考文献列表是手工筛选的。纳入了招募HFpEF患者并报告了恩格列净效果的试验。使用Endnote X9软件进行研究筛选过程。结果:1235篇论文中有14篇入选全文综述。系统综述包括9篇论文,均为随机对照试验。根据个别试验的结果,恩格列净比安慰剂更有效,而且在统计学上没有明显的安全性优势。结论:根据中等质量的数据,与安慰剂相比,恩格列净治疗HFpEF患者似乎既安全又有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empagliflozin Treatment for Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review
Objective: The goal of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of empagliflozin in managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as compared with a placebo. Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for articles from 2000 to November 2022. Reference lists of articles were manually screened. Trials that recruited patients with HFpEF and reported the effects of empagliflozin were included. Endnote X9 software was used for study screening process. Results: 14 papers out of 1235 found were selected for full-text reviews. The systematic review included nine papers that were all randomized controlled trials. According to the findings of individual trials, empagliflozin is more effective and has a statistically insignificant safety advantage over a placebo. Conclusion: Empagliflozin treatment for HFpEF patients appears to be both safe and efficient when compared to a placebo, according to data of moderate quality
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional, Non-Randomized, Single-Blinded, and Single-Center Study for the Accuracy of 12 Lead Smartphone ECG in the Detection of Ventricular Arrhythmias A Single Blinded, Cross-Sectional, Single-Center Study for the Validation of Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Spandan Smartphone ECG Bridging Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy with a Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Case Report of Protruded Implantable Cardiac Device through Chest in 50 Years Old Male Giant Hematoma of Rectus Abdominis Muscle in a Patient with Schistosomiasis without Periportal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1