结合需求挖掘、软件模型检查和基于仿真的工业汽车系统验证

Tomoya Yamaguchi, T. Kaga, Alexandre Donzé, S. Seshia
{"title":"结合需求挖掘、软件模型检查和基于仿真的工业汽车系统验证","authors":"Tomoya Yamaguchi, T. Kaga, Alexandre Donzé, S. Seshia","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The verification and validation of industrial closed-loop automotive systems still remains a major challenge. The overall goal is to verify properties of the closed-loop combination of control software and physical plant. While current software model-checking techniques can be applied on a software component of the system, the end result is not very useful unless the interactions with the physical plant and other software components are captured. To this end, we present an industrial case study in which we combine requirement mining, software model-checking, and simulation-based verification to find issues in industrial automotive systems. Our methodology combines the the scalability of simulation-based verification of hybrid systems with the effectiveness of software model-checking at the unit level. We presents two case studies: one on a publicly available Abstract Fuel Control System benchmark and another on an actual production SiLS (Software in the Loop Simulator) benchmark. Together these case studies demonstrate the practicality of the proposed methodology.","PeriodicalId":6479,"journal":{"name":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","volume":"16 1","pages":"201-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining requirement mining, software model checking and simulation-based verification for industrial automotive systems\",\"authors\":\"Tomoya Yamaguchi, T. Kaga, Alexandre Donzé, S. Seshia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The verification and validation of industrial closed-loop automotive systems still remains a major challenge. The overall goal is to verify properties of the closed-loop combination of control software and physical plant. While current software model-checking techniques can be applied on a software component of the system, the end result is not very useful unless the interactions with the physical plant and other software components are captured. To this end, we present an industrial case study in which we combine requirement mining, software model-checking, and simulation-based verification to find issues in industrial automotive systems. Our methodology combines the the scalability of simulation-based verification of hybrid systems with the effectiveness of software model-checking at the unit level. We presents two case studies: one on a publicly available Abstract Fuel Control System benchmark and another on an actual production SiLS (Software in the Loop Simulator) benchmark. Together these case studies demonstrate the practicality of the proposed methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"201-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

工业闭环汽车系统的验证和验证仍然是一个重大挑战。总体目标是验证控制软件和物理设备的闭环组合的特性。虽然当前的软件模型检查技术可以应用于系统的软件组件,但除非捕获与物理设备和其他软件组件的交互,否则最终结果不是很有用。为此,我们提出了一个工业案例研究,其中我们结合了需求挖掘,软件模型检查和基于仿真的验证来发现工业汽车系统中的问题。我们的方法结合了基于仿真的混合系统验证的可扩展性和单元级软件模型检查的有效性。我们介绍了两个案例研究:一个是公开的抽象燃料控制系统基准测试,另一个是实际生产的SiLS(软件在环模拟器)基准测试。这些案例研究共同证明了所提出方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining requirement mining, software model checking and simulation-based verification for industrial automotive systems
The verification and validation of industrial closed-loop automotive systems still remains a major challenge. The overall goal is to verify properties of the closed-loop combination of control software and physical plant. While current software model-checking techniques can be applied on a software component of the system, the end result is not very useful unless the interactions with the physical plant and other software components are captured. To this end, we present an industrial case study in which we combine requirement mining, software model-checking, and simulation-based verification to find issues in industrial automotive systems. Our methodology combines the the scalability of simulation-based verification of hybrid systems with the effectiveness of software model-checking at the unit level. We presents two case studies: one on a publicly available Abstract Fuel Control System benchmark and another on an actual production SiLS (Software in the Loop Simulator) benchmark. Together these case studies demonstrate the practicality of the proposed methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The FMCAD 2022 Student Forum How Testable is Business Software? The FMCAD 2020 Student Forum From Correctness to High Quality Concurrent Chaining Hash Maps for Software Model Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1