E. Ivanov, D. Korobkov, A. Sidorenkov, I. Varfolomeev, M. Stukan
{"title":"数字岩石扩展实验室岩心试验结果的酸处理优化","authors":"E. Ivanov, D. Korobkov, A. Sidorenkov, I. Varfolomeev, M. Stukan","doi":"10.2118/206591-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Nowadays acidizing became one of the most common approaches used to increase the hydrocarbons production from carbonate reservoirs. An acid solution injected under pressures below the formation fracture pressures dissolves the rock matrix and, thus, facilitates the fluid flow.\n However, the overall treatment efficiency is crucially dependent on the acid composition and injection scenario, since the different dissolution patterns are created depending on the effective reaction rate (i.e. acid composition and matrix mineralogy) of the reactive fluid and the fluid injection rate. At slow injection rates, when the acid is spent before penetrating deep into the rock, the face dissolution scenario is observed. On the other hand, fast injection results in uniform distribution of the acid along the treatment zone and similar uniform dissolution of the matrix. The best result from production improvement point of view is achieved when the acid creates a set of thin channels - the so-called wormholes. This optimum regime corresponds to the minimum in the pore volume to breakthrough (PVBT) dependence on injection rate (Fredd, 1998; Zhang, 2021). Where PVBT is defined as the amount of treatment fluid (measured in core pore volumes) required to be injected before the appearance of macroscopic flow channel linking the opposite faces of the core. Thus, since the optimal acid composition and the injection rate are determined by geology and lithology of the reservoir, to achieve the best effect, each treatment should be preceded by experiments on representative rock samples.\n In addition to that, the parameters to be optimized for a typical acidizing job also include the sequence of injected fluids and the amount of the fluid to be injected (Yudin A., 2021), which requires an extensive laboratory study. Unfortunately, the amount of the core material available is usually not sufficient for such a comprehensive laboratory analysis. Moreover, the destructive nature of acidizing experiments imposes the fundamental limitation: experiments are performed on different core samples, which makes the results less conclusive.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Rock Extension of Laboratory Core Test Results for Acid Treatment Optimization\",\"authors\":\"E. Ivanov, D. Korobkov, A. Sidorenkov, I. Varfolomeev, M. Stukan\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/206591-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Nowadays acidizing became one of the most common approaches used to increase the hydrocarbons production from carbonate reservoirs. An acid solution injected under pressures below the formation fracture pressures dissolves the rock matrix and, thus, facilitates the fluid flow.\\n However, the overall treatment efficiency is crucially dependent on the acid composition and injection scenario, since the different dissolution patterns are created depending on the effective reaction rate (i.e. acid composition and matrix mineralogy) of the reactive fluid and the fluid injection rate. At slow injection rates, when the acid is spent before penetrating deep into the rock, the face dissolution scenario is observed. On the other hand, fast injection results in uniform distribution of the acid along the treatment zone and similar uniform dissolution of the matrix. The best result from production improvement point of view is achieved when the acid creates a set of thin channels - the so-called wormholes. This optimum regime corresponds to the minimum in the pore volume to breakthrough (PVBT) dependence on injection rate (Fredd, 1998; Zhang, 2021). Where PVBT is defined as the amount of treatment fluid (measured in core pore volumes) required to be injected before the appearance of macroscopic flow channel linking the opposite faces of the core. Thus, since the optimal acid composition and the injection rate are determined by geology and lithology of the reservoir, to achieve the best effect, each treatment should be preceded by experiments on representative rock samples.\\n In addition to that, the parameters to be optimized for a typical acidizing job also include the sequence of injected fluids and the amount of the fluid to be injected (Yudin A., 2021), which requires an extensive laboratory study. Unfortunately, the amount of the core material available is usually not sufficient for such a comprehensive laboratory analysis. Moreover, the destructive nature of acidizing experiments imposes the fundamental limitation: experiments are performed on different core samples, which makes the results less conclusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/206591-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206591-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前,酸化已成为提高碳酸盐岩储层油气产量的最常用方法之一。在低于地层破裂压力的压力下注入酸溶液会溶解岩石基质,从而促进流体流动。然而,整体处理效率主要取决于酸成分和注入情况,因为不同的溶解模式取决于反应流体的有效反应速率(即酸成分和基质矿物学)和流体注入速率。在注入速度较慢的情况下,当酸在深入岩石之前耗尽时,观察到工作面溶解情况。另一方面,快速注入导致酸沿处理区均匀分布,并且基体的溶解也同样均匀。从提高产量的角度来看,最好的结果是当酸产生一组薄通道时,即所谓的虫洞。这种最佳状态对应于孔隙体积与突破(PVBT)对注入速率的最小依赖(Fredd, 1998;张,2021)。其中PVBT定义为在连接岩心相对面的宏观流动通道出现之前需要注入的处理液量(以岩心孔隙体积测量)。因此,由于储层的地质和岩性决定了最佳的酸成分和注入速度,为了达到最佳效果,每次处理前都要对有代表性的岩石样品进行实验。除此之外,典型酸化作业需要优化的参数还包括注入流体的顺序和注入流体的量(Yudin a ., 2021),这需要进行广泛的实验室研究。不幸的是,可用的堆芯材料的数量通常不足以进行如此全面的实验室分析。此外,酸化实验的破坏性给实验带来了根本性的限制:实验是在不同的岩心样品上进行的,这使得结果不那么确凿。
Digital Rock Extension of Laboratory Core Test Results for Acid Treatment Optimization
Nowadays acidizing became one of the most common approaches used to increase the hydrocarbons production from carbonate reservoirs. An acid solution injected under pressures below the formation fracture pressures dissolves the rock matrix and, thus, facilitates the fluid flow.
However, the overall treatment efficiency is crucially dependent on the acid composition and injection scenario, since the different dissolution patterns are created depending on the effective reaction rate (i.e. acid composition and matrix mineralogy) of the reactive fluid and the fluid injection rate. At slow injection rates, when the acid is spent before penetrating deep into the rock, the face dissolution scenario is observed. On the other hand, fast injection results in uniform distribution of the acid along the treatment zone and similar uniform dissolution of the matrix. The best result from production improvement point of view is achieved when the acid creates a set of thin channels - the so-called wormholes. This optimum regime corresponds to the minimum in the pore volume to breakthrough (PVBT) dependence on injection rate (Fredd, 1998; Zhang, 2021). Where PVBT is defined as the amount of treatment fluid (measured in core pore volumes) required to be injected before the appearance of macroscopic flow channel linking the opposite faces of the core. Thus, since the optimal acid composition and the injection rate are determined by geology and lithology of the reservoir, to achieve the best effect, each treatment should be preceded by experiments on representative rock samples.
In addition to that, the parameters to be optimized for a typical acidizing job also include the sequence of injected fluids and the amount of the fluid to be injected (Yudin A., 2021), which requires an extensive laboratory study. Unfortunately, the amount of the core material available is usually not sufficient for such a comprehensive laboratory analysis. Moreover, the destructive nature of acidizing experiments imposes the fundamental limitation: experiments are performed on different core samples, which makes the results less conclusive.