DSM-5 人格问卷(PID-5)的基本结构:人格精神病理学的一般因素。

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp/163182
Silvana A Montes, Roberto O Sanchez
{"title":"DSM-5 人格问卷(PID-5)的基本结构:人格精神病理学的一般因素。","authors":"Silvana A Montes, Roberto O Sanchez","doi":"10.5114/cipp/163182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psychopathology of personality is currently undergoing a paradigm shift from a categorical to a dimensional approach. This work aimed to study the underlying structure of pathological personality traits of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). For this purpose, the internal structure of a version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was examined by a confirmatory factor analysis. This version assesses the five higher-order pathological personality domains (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 lower-order pathological personality facets through a reduced number of items. Four alternative models were compared: five-factor oblique; second-order (five first-order factors and one second-order factor); bifactor (five specific factors and a general factor), and one-factor.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>We worked with an Argentinean sample of <i>N</i> = 525 subjects from the general population who answered the Argentine version of the PID-5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five-factor model was slightly superior to the second order model, and the bifactor model presented the best fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings, while preliminary, suggest that the PID-5 facets could reflect five specific pathological personality traits (which correspond to AMPD domains) but also a general factor (which would reflect a general propensity for psychopathology).</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The underlying structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): a general factor of personality psychopathology.\",\"authors\":\"Silvana A Montes, Roberto O Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp/163182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The psychopathology of personality is currently undergoing a paradigm shift from a categorical to a dimensional approach. This work aimed to study the underlying structure of pathological personality traits of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). For this purpose, the internal structure of a version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was examined by a confirmatory factor analysis. This version assesses the five higher-order pathological personality domains (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 lower-order pathological personality facets through a reduced number of items. Four alternative models were compared: five-factor oblique; second-order (five first-order factors and one second-order factor); bifactor (five specific factors and a general factor), and one-factor.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>We worked with an Argentinean sample of <i>N</i> = 525 subjects from the general population who answered the Argentine version of the PID-5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five-factor model was slightly superior to the second order model, and the bifactor model presented the best fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings, while preliminary, suggest that the PID-5 facets could reflect five specific pathological personality traits (which correspond to AMPD domains) but also a general factor (which would reflect a general propensity for psychopathology).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129047/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/163182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/163182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人格精神病理学目前正经历着从分类方法到维度方法的范式转变。这项工作旨在研究 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中病态人格特征的基本结构。为此,我们通过确证因子分析对 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)版本的内部结构进行了研究。该版本通过减少项目数量来评估五个高阶病态人格领域(消极情感、疏离、对抗、抑制和精神病性)和 25 个低阶病态人格方面。我们比较了四种可供选择的模型:五因素斜向模型、二阶模型(五个一阶因素和一个二阶因素)、双因素模型(五个特定因素和一个一般因素)以及单因素模型:我们从阿根廷的普通人群中抽取了 N = 525 名受试者,他们回答了阿根廷版的 PID-5 结果:结果:五因素模型略优于二阶模型,双因素模型的拟合度最高:这些发现虽然是初步的,但表明 PID-5 可反映五个特定的病态人格特征(与 AMPD 领域相对应),同时也可反映一个一般因素(反映一般的精神病态倾向)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The underlying structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): a general factor of personality psychopathology.

Background: The psychopathology of personality is currently undergoing a paradigm shift from a categorical to a dimensional approach. This work aimed to study the underlying structure of pathological personality traits of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). For this purpose, the internal structure of a version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) was examined by a confirmatory factor analysis. This version assesses the five higher-order pathological personality domains (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 lower-order pathological personality facets through a reduced number of items. Four alternative models were compared: five-factor oblique; second-order (five first-order factors and one second-order factor); bifactor (five specific factors and a general factor), and one-factor.

Participants and procedure: We worked with an Argentinean sample of N = 525 subjects from the general population who answered the Argentine version of the PID-5.

Results: The five-factor model was slightly superior to the second order model, and the bifactor model presented the best fit.

Conclusions: These findings, while preliminary, suggest that the PID-5 facets could reflect five specific pathological personality traits (which correspond to AMPD domains) but also a general factor (which would reflect a general propensity for psychopathology).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Who agrees more? The role of age, education, and the ability to solve verbal analogies in acquiescence Psychometric properties of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory for Children and Adolescents (TIPI-CA) in a Spanish sample Daily state of motivation as the effect of appreciation in a diary study. The effect of risk of contracting and fear of COVID-19 on burnout and job satisfaction in Polish teachers Sexual satisfaction and oversexualization among adults. The moderating role of self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1