学者对COVID-19紧急远程教学中应用的测量和评估实践是否满意?

H. Özdemir, Çetin Toraman, Güneş Korkmaz
{"title":"学者对COVID-19紧急远程教学中应用的测量和评估实践是否满意?","authors":"H. Özdemir, Çetin Toraman, Güneş Korkmaz","doi":"10.22521/edupij.2022.114.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/purpose -The aim of this research is to examine the meanings through metaphors that academics derive from their experiences regarding the measurement and evaluation practices when emergency remote teaching was conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, to identify the problems they experienced with the measurement and evaluation practices, and to present their solution recommendations. Materials/methods -The study was structured as a qualitative research. The problems experienced by academics in measurement and evaluation practices, together with their solution suggestions were examined according to the \"basic qualitative research\" pattern. On the other hand, the \"phenomenological qualitative research\" design was used since the meanings attributed to the measurement and evaluation practice experiences were examined through metaphors. The participants of the study were 2,321 academics teaching at state and private universities in Turkey. Results - The findings reveal that most of the problems experienced were related to \"cheating, test security, fair exam environment, plagiarism, inability to measure whether learning objectives had been achieved, inappropriate online measurement and evaluation methods, lack of quality in assessment practices, and technical issues regarding learning management systems.\" Conclusion - The solutions proposed by the participant academics were the use of alternative assessment methods, conducting face-to-face rather than online exams, asking different questions for each student by mixing up the questions in the exam, and using webcams for online exam invigilation. Metaphors attributed to the measurement and evaluation practices were grouped under three categories;as positive metaphors (e.g., lighthouse, life buoy), negative metaphors (e.g., hallucination, digging a well with a needle), and metaphors implying that such practices played a key role (e.g., water in desert, surgery) in emergency. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited.","PeriodicalId":30989,"journal":{"name":"Educational Process International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Academics Satisfied with the Measurement and Evaluation Practices Applied During Emergency Remote Teaching due to COVID-19?\",\"authors\":\"H. Özdemir, Çetin Toraman, Güneş Korkmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.22521/edupij.2022.114.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/purpose -The aim of this research is to examine the meanings through metaphors that academics derive from their experiences regarding the measurement and evaluation practices when emergency remote teaching was conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, to identify the problems they experienced with the measurement and evaluation practices, and to present their solution recommendations. Materials/methods -The study was structured as a qualitative research. The problems experienced by academics in measurement and evaluation practices, together with their solution suggestions were examined according to the \\\"basic qualitative research\\\" pattern. On the other hand, the \\\"phenomenological qualitative research\\\" design was used since the meanings attributed to the measurement and evaluation practice experiences were examined through metaphors. The participants of the study were 2,321 academics teaching at state and private universities in Turkey. Results - The findings reveal that most of the problems experienced were related to \\\"cheating, test security, fair exam environment, plagiarism, inability to measure whether learning objectives had been achieved, inappropriate online measurement and evaluation methods, lack of quality in assessment practices, and technical issues regarding learning management systems.\\\" Conclusion - The solutions proposed by the participant academics were the use of alternative assessment methods, conducting face-to-face rather than online exams, asking different questions for each student by mixing up the questions in the exam, and using webcams for online exam invigilation. Metaphors attributed to the measurement and evaluation practices were grouped under three categories;as positive metaphors (e.g., lighthouse, life buoy), negative metaphors (e.g., hallucination, digging a well with a needle), and metaphors implying that such practices played a key role (e.g., water in desert, surgery) in emergency. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Process International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Process International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.114.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Process International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.114.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景/目的-本研究的目的是通过隐喻来考察由于COVID-19大流行而进行紧急远程教学时,学者们从他们的测量和评估实践中获得的意义,找出他们在测量和评估实践中遇到的问题,并提出解决方案建议。材料/方法-本研究为定性研究。根据“基础定性研究”模式,对学者在计量评价实践中遇到的问题及解决建议进行了考察。另一方面,采用“现象学质的研究”设计,通过隐喻来检验测量和评价实践经验所赋予的意义。这项研究的参与者是2321名在土耳其州立和私立大学任教的学者。结果-调查结果显示,大多数问题与“作弊、考试安全、公平的考试环境、抄袭、无法衡量是否达到学习目标、不适当的在线测量和评估方法、评估实践缺乏质量以及学习管理系统的技术问题”有关。结论-参与学者提出的解决方案是使用替代评估方法,进行面对面而不是在线考试,通过混合考试中的问题为每个学生提出不同的问题,以及使用网络摄像头进行在线考试监考。与测量和评价做法有关的隐喻分为三类:积极隐喻(如灯塔、救生圈)、消极隐喻(如幻觉、用针挖井)和暗示此类做法在紧急情况下发挥关键作用的隐喻(如沙漠中的水、外科手术)。版权所有©2022由作者所有。本作品遵循知识共享署名-非商业4.0国际许可协议(CC-BY-4.0),允许下载和分享作品,只要适当引用即可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Academics Satisfied with the Measurement and Evaluation Practices Applied During Emergency Remote Teaching due to COVID-19?
Background/purpose -The aim of this research is to examine the meanings through metaphors that academics derive from their experiences regarding the measurement and evaluation practices when emergency remote teaching was conducted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, to identify the problems they experienced with the measurement and evaluation practices, and to present their solution recommendations. Materials/methods -The study was structured as a qualitative research. The problems experienced by academics in measurement and evaluation practices, together with their solution suggestions were examined according to the "basic qualitative research" pattern. On the other hand, the "phenomenological qualitative research" design was used since the meanings attributed to the measurement and evaluation practice experiences were examined through metaphors. The participants of the study were 2,321 academics teaching at state and private universities in Turkey. Results - The findings reveal that most of the problems experienced were related to "cheating, test security, fair exam environment, plagiarism, inability to measure whether learning objectives had been achieved, inappropriate online measurement and evaluation methods, lack of quality in assessment practices, and technical issues regarding learning management systems." Conclusion - The solutions proposed by the participant academics were the use of alternative assessment methods, conducting face-to-face rather than online exams, asking different questions for each student by mixing up the questions in the exam, and using webcams for online exam invigilation. Metaphors attributed to the measurement and evaluation practices were grouped under three categories;as positive metaphors (e.g., lighthouse, life buoy), negative metaphors (e.g., hallucination, digging a well with a needle), and metaphors implying that such practices played a key role (e.g., water in desert, surgery) in emergency. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-4.0), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Process International Journal
Educational Process International Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
How Does Students’ Knowledge About Information-Seeking Improve Their Behavior in Solving Information Problems? Greek Preschool Teachers’ Professional Features and Their Knowledge and Views of the Official Standards of Early Writing Teaching Digital Leadership and Sustainable School Improvement—A Conceptual Analysis and Implications for Future Research Expectations for Training Mentors: Insights from a Preservice Language Teacher Education Program The Use of Works of Musical Art in Preschool Education: A Slovak Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1