建筑、工程和建筑中概念产品建模的现象学基础

Žiga Turk
{"title":"建筑、工程和建筑中概念产品建模的现象学基础","authors":"Žiga Turk","doi":"10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00008-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ultimate goal of conceptual modelling in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) has been to define the data structures that could be used to describe the entire built environment through all its life cycle stages — from inception and design to demolition. In spite of the magnitude and complexity of this task, the theoretical foundations of modelling received little attention. In this paper, the theoretical foundations of the traditional modelling approaches are questioned using phenomenology and hermeneutics as philosophical base. The author exposes the difference between the remodelling of some existing models, the modelling of physical objects and the modelling of psychical, intentional objects. The author concludes that AEC or building product and process models do not model objective reality but the modeller's partial understanding of that reality. Therefore, several correct but different models may and should exist. Future software architectures in AEC should not be built on a unified, centralized model but, on a combination of models, which may not be standardised but whose schemas are encoded in a standard manner.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100123,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00008-5","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenomenologial foundations of conceptual product modelling in architecture, engineering and construction\",\"authors\":\"Žiga Turk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00008-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ultimate goal of conceptual modelling in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) has been to define the data structures that could be used to describe the entire built environment through all its life cycle stages — from inception and design to demolition. In spite of the magnitude and complexity of this task, the theoretical foundations of modelling received little attention. In this paper, the theoretical foundations of the traditional modelling approaches are questioned using phenomenology and hermeneutics as philosophical base. The author exposes the difference between the remodelling of some existing models, the modelling of physical objects and the modelling of psychical, intentional objects. The author concludes that AEC or building product and process models do not model objective reality but the modeller's partial understanding of that reality. Therefore, several correct but different models may and should exist. Future software architectures in AEC should not be built on a unified, centralized model but, on a combination of models, which may not be standardised but whose schemas are encoded in a standard manner.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00008-5\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954181001000085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954181001000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

建筑、工程和施工(AEC)概念建模的最终目标是定义数据结构,这些数据结构可用于描述整个建筑环境的所有生命周期阶段——从开始、设计到拆除。尽管这项任务的规模和复杂性,建模的理论基础很少受到关注。本文以现象学和解释学为哲学基础,对传统建模方法的理论基础提出了质疑。作者揭示了一些现有模型的建模,物理对象的建模和精神的,有意向的对象的建模之间的区别。作者的结论是,AEC或构建产品和过程模型不是对客观现实的建模,而是建模者对现实的部分理解。因此,几个正确但不同的模型可能而且应该存在。AEC中未来的软件架构不应该建立在统一的、集中的模型上,而应该建立在模型的组合上,这些模型可能没有标准化,但其模式以标准的方式编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phenomenologial foundations of conceptual product modelling in architecture, engineering and construction

The ultimate goal of conceptual modelling in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) has been to define the data structures that could be used to describe the entire built environment through all its life cycle stages — from inception and design to demolition. In spite of the magnitude and complexity of this task, the theoretical foundations of modelling received little attention. In this paper, the theoretical foundations of the traditional modelling approaches are questioned using phenomenology and hermeneutics as philosophical base. The author exposes the difference between the remodelling of some existing models, the modelling of physical objects and the modelling of psychical, intentional objects. The author concludes that AEC or building product and process models do not model objective reality but the modeller's partial understanding of that reality. Therefore, several correct but different models may and should exist. Future software architectures in AEC should not be built on a unified, centralized model but, on a combination of models, which may not be standardised but whose schemas are encoded in a standard manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Volume Contents Simulating behaviors of human situation awareness under high workloads Emergent synthesis of motion patterns for locomotion robots Synthesis and emergence — research overview Concept of self-reconfigurable modular robotic system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1