埃塞俄比亚中南部以保护性农业为基础的玉米-菜豆种植系统

Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, S. Seyoum, W. Mupangwa, A. Lemma, Haimanot Beruk Senbeta, Mamud Aman Tello, Mesele Haile Onu, Tesfaye Hailu Estifanose
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中南部以保护性农业为基础的玉米-菜豆种植系统","authors":"Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, S. Seyoum, W. Mupangwa, A. Lemma, Haimanot Beruk Senbeta, Mamud Aman Tello, Mesele Haile Onu, Tesfaye Hailu Estifanose","doi":"10.5897/AJPS2021.2151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation agriculture (CA) is defined as sustainable agriculture production system comprising a set of farming practices. The experiment was conducted at three districts from 2011 to 2016 at five farmers’ field they considered as replicate. The experiment consisted of five treatments (continuous sole maize, maize bean rotation, maize-bean inter-cropping, bean rotation under CA and farmer practice). Maize yield and yield related traits and soil water data were collected from each site. Soil moisture content under CA practices was higher than the farmer practice. At East-Badawacho and Meskan grain yield was higher by 4 and 8% in CA compared with farmer practice, respectively. Maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA out yielded the farmer practice by 13 and 4%, respectively but inter-cropping had 5% lower grain yield. At Hawassa-Zuriya, CA maize bean rotation had higher yield than farmer practice in 2011 and 2013. Maize-bean inter-cropping, maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA had 10, 8 and 6% higher grain yield than farmer practice, respectively. Common bean grain yield from bean rotation under CA had 2799, 2908, and 3226 kg ha-1, from inter cropping bean grain yield of 817, 1065 and 927 kg ha-1 obtained at East-Badawacho, Hawassa-Zuriya and Meskan districts, respectively. Generally, CA cropping systems had drought stress reduction potential and greater yields compared with farmer practice. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Farmer-practice, sole-maize, rotation, inter-cropping, rift-valley.","PeriodicalId":7675,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Plant Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation agriculture-based Zea mays (maize)-Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) cropping systems in South Central Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Goshime Muluneh Mekasha, S. Seyoum, W. Mupangwa, A. Lemma, Haimanot Beruk Senbeta, Mamud Aman Tello, Mesele Haile Onu, Tesfaye Hailu Estifanose\",\"doi\":\"10.5897/AJPS2021.2151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conservation agriculture (CA) is defined as sustainable agriculture production system comprising a set of farming practices. The experiment was conducted at three districts from 2011 to 2016 at five farmers’ field they considered as replicate. The experiment consisted of five treatments (continuous sole maize, maize bean rotation, maize-bean inter-cropping, bean rotation under CA and farmer practice). Maize yield and yield related traits and soil water data were collected from each site. Soil moisture content under CA practices was higher than the farmer practice. At East-Badawacho and Meskan grain yield was higher by 4 and 8% in CA compared with farmer practice, respectively. Maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA out yielded the farmer practice by 13 and 4%, respectively but inter-cropping had 5% lower grain yield. At Hawassa-Zuriya, CA maize bean rotation had higher yield than farmer practice in 2011 and 2013. Maize-bean inter-cropping, maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA had 10, 8 and 6% higher grain yield than farmer practice, respectively. Common bean grain yield from bean rotation under CA had 2799, 2908, and 3226 kg ha-1, from inter cropping bean grain yield of 817, 1065 and 927 kg ha-1 obtained at East-Badawacho, Hawassa-Zuriya and Meskan districts, respectively. Generally, CA cropping systems had drought stress reduction potential and greater yields compared with farmer practice. \\n \\n   \\n \\n Key words: Farmer-practice, sole-maize, rotation, inter-cropping, rift-valley.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Plant Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Plant Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2021.2151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2021.2151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护性农业(CA)被定义为包括一套耕作方法的可持续农业生产系统。试验于2011年至2016年在3个县的5块他们认为是重复的农民田地进行。试验包括5个处理:玉米单作连作、玉米豆轮作、玉米豆间作、玉米轮作和农户实践。收集玉米产量及其相关性状和土壤水分资料。CA处理的土壤含水量高于农民处理。在东-巴达瓦乔和梅斯坎,与农民实践相比,CA的粮食产量分别提高了4%和8%。玉米轮作和玉米单作的产量分别比玉米轮作高出13%和4%,但间作的产量比玉米轮作低5%。2011年和2013年,在Hawassa-Zuriya, CA玉米豆类轮作的产量高于农民轮作。玉米-豆类间作、玉米-豆类轮作和玉米单作的产量分别比农民增产10.8%和6%。轮作大豆的产量分别为2799、2908和3226 kg ha-1,而在East-Badawacho、Hawassa-Zuriya和Meskan地区,间作大豆的产量分别为817、1065和927 kg ha-1。总的来说,与农民实践相比,CA种植制度具有减轻干旱胁迫的潜力和更高的产量。关键词:农民实践,单玉米,轮作,间作,裂谷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservation agriculture-based Zea mays (maize)-Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) cropping systems in South Central Ethiopia
Conservation agriculture (CA) is defined as sustainable agriculture production system comprising a set of farming practices. The experiment was conducted at three districts from 2011 to 2016 at five farmers’ field they considered as replicate. The experiment consisted of five treatments (continuous sole maize, maize bean rotation, maize-bean inter-cropping, bean rotation under CA and farmer practice). Maize yield and yield related traits and soil water data were collected from each site. Soil moisture content under CA practices was higher than the farmer practice. At East-Badawacho and Meskan grain yield was higher by 4 and 8% in CA compared with farmer practice, respectively. Maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA out yielded the farmer practice by 13 and 4%, respectively but inter-cropping had 5% lower grain yield. At Hawassa-Zuriya, CA maize bean rotation had higher yield than farmer practice in 2011 and 2013. Maize-bean inter-cropping, maize bean rotation and sole maize under CA had 10, 8 and 6% higher grain yield than farmer practice, respectively. Common bean grain yield from bean rotation under CA had 2799, 2908, and 3226 kg ha-1, from inter cropping bean grain yield of 817, 1065 and 927 kg ha-1 obtained at East-Badawacho, Hawassa-Zuriya and Meskan districts, respectively. Generally, CA cropping systems had drought stress reduction potential and greater yields compared with farmer practice.   Key words: Farmer-practice, sole-maize, rotation, inter-cropping, rift-valley.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detached berries response to coffee berry disease (Colletotrichum kahawae) of F1 hybrid genotypes developed from Ethiopian accessions of Arabica coffee In vivo effect of cashew apple powder on fungi isolated from stored maize seed (EV8728-SR) Relationship between rice blast severity and the rice growth stage for accurate selection of rice breeding material for improved rice production in Africa Screening Sclerocarya birrea provenances on pests and diseases: A step towards domestication Distribution of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) root rot complex and associated pathogens in eastern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1