蓝草作为能源原料的生产成本及残留物评价

M. Stolarski, M. Krzyżaniak, M. Śnieg, M. Christou, E. Alexopoulou
{"title":"蓝草作为能源原料的生产成本及残留物评价","authors":"M. Stolarski, M. Krzyżaniak, M. Śnieg, M. Christou, E. Alexopoulou","doi":"10.14799/EBMS219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abyssinica grown in two variants (with and without herbicides). In addition, the quality of by-products (straw and cake) as energy feedstocks was evaluated. Costs of production of Crambe abyssinica seeds in the variant with herbicides were nearly 140€·ha-1 higher than in the variant without herbicides. The yield of pure seeds was by over 110kg·ha-1 higher in the herbicidetreated variant than in the treatment without weed control. However, the yield of straw was higher on fields without application of herbicides, but that straw had a higher moisture content due to the presence of weeds. The lower heating value of crambe straw was 15.3MJ·kg-1 on average and the straw content of ash was 5.68% D.M. The cake obtained from the crop had a much higher lower heating value (21.95MJ·kg-1) and ash content 6.41% D.M. Moreover, it was found to contain much more carbon and hydrogen, as well as five-fold more sulfur than straw. Production costs and residues evaluation of Crambe abyssinica as an energy feedstock*","PeriodicalId":11733,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production costs and residues evaluation of Crambe abyssinica as an energy feedstock\",\"authors\":\"M. Stolarski, M. Krzyżaniak, M. Śnieg, M. Christou, E. Alexopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.14799/EBMS219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abyssinica grown in two variants (with and without herbicides). In addition, the quality of by-products (straw and cake) as energy feedstocks was evaluated. Costs of production of Crambe abyssinica seeds in the variant with herbicides were nearly 140€·ha-1 higher than in the variant without herbicides. The yield of pure seeds was by over 110kg·ha-1 higher in the herbicidetreated variant than in the treatment without weed control. However, the yield of straw was higher on fields without application of herbicides, but that straw had a higher moisture content due to the presence of weeds. The lower heating value of crambe straw was 15.3MJ·kg-1 on average and the straw content of ash was 5.68% D.M. The cake obtained from the crop had a much higher lower heating value (21.95MJ·kg-1) and ash content 6.41% D.M. Moreover, it was found to contain much more carbon and hydrogen, as well as five-fold more sulfur than straw. Production costs and residues evaluation of Crambe abyssinica as an energy feedstock*\",\"PeriodicalId\":11733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14799/EBMS219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14799/EBMS219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

阿比西尼亚有两种变种(有和没有除草剂)。此外,还对作为能源原料的副产品(秸秆和饼)的质量进行了评价。使用除草剂的品种比不使用除草剂的品种的生产成本高出近140欧元·ha-1。除草剂处理的纯种子产量比未除杂草处理高出110kg·ha-1以上。然而,在不施用除草剂的田地中,秸秆的产量较高,但由于杂草的存在,秸秆的含水量较高。克兰秸秆的低热值平均为15.3MJ·kg-1,秸秆灰分含量为5.68% D.M.。克兰秸秆的低热值为21.95MJ·kg-1,灰分含量为6.41% D.M.。克兰秸秆的碳、氢和硫含量均比秸秆高5倍。作为能源原料的深蓝草的生产成本及残留物评价*
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Production costs and residues evaluation of Crambe abyssinica as an energy feedstock
abyssinica grown in two variants (with and without herbicides). In addition, the quality of by-products (straw and cake) as energy feedstocks was evaluated. Costs of production of Crambe abyssinica seeds in the variant with herbicides were nearly 140€·ha-1 higher than in the variant without herbicides. The yield of pure seeds was by over 110kg·ha-1 higher in the herbicidetreated variant than in the treatment without weed control. However, the yield of straw was higher on fields without application of herbicides, but that straw had a higher moisture content due to the presence of weeds. The lower heating value of crambe straw was 15.3MJ·kg-1 on average and the straw content of ash was 5.68% D.M. The cake obtained from the crop had a much higher lower heating value (21.95MJ·kg-1) and ash content 6.41% D.M. Moreover, it was found to contain much more carbon and hydrogen, as well as five-fold more sulfur than straw. Production costs and residues evaluation of Crambe abyssinica as an energy feedstock*
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature-based and technology-based solutions for sustainable blue growth and climate change mitigation in marine biodiversity hotspots Exploring Baltic Sea cyanobacteria for small-molecule inhibitors of microRNA function: a project description New microsatellite multiplex PCR sets for genetic studies of the sterlet sturgeon, Acipenser ruthenus Measurement of bacterial adhesion to metal surfaces with different chemical composition - evaluation of different methods Treatment of simulated oil and gas production wastewater using Typha latifolia in a pilot-scale constructed wetland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1