绩效分析、增值和降低洋葱农业链风险

Ayu Resti Pamungkassari, Marimin, dan Indah Yuliasih
{"title":"绩效分析、增值和降低洋葱农业链风险","authors":"Ayu Resti Pamungkassari, Marimin, dan Indah Yuliasih","doi":"10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2018.28.1.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The supply chain of shallot agroindustry is in urgent situation owing to theimbalance risk and added-value distribution of the actors in the supply chain. The purposes of this research were (1) to identify the mechanism and performance of shallot supply chain; (2) to measure the added-value of supply chain actors; (3) to identify and mitigate the risk in shallot supply chain; and (4) to select the strategy to improve the performances, added-value, and risk mitigation ofshallot supply chain. Supply Chain Operations Reference - Analytical Hierarchy Process ( SCOR-AHP)wereemployed to measure the performance of shallot supply chain.Hayami method was used to analyze the added-value.House of Risk (HOR)was used to identify and mitigate the risk, while the strategies for the improvements were formulated using Analytic Network Process-Benefit Opportunity Cost Risk analysis (ANP-BOCR) method. Analysis on the supply chain performance showed those classified as below average were farmer (75.38%), first collector (74.43%), and industry (74.79%), whereasthe second collector hadagood performance (91.97%). Added-value ratios were for the industry of 53.75%, farmer of 46.06%, first collector of 8.88%, and second collector of 5.39%.Total effectivity measurement of risk mitigation to prioritized risk agent resulted the farmer had11 preventive actions,the collectors had9 and the industry had8. The supply chain evaluation resulted in four alternatives for the improvement strategy of the performance, added-value and risk mitigation.The best alternative with the highest BO/CR ratio was the implementation of the SOP of proper cultivation and post-harvesting method. Keywords: shallot agroindustry, risk mitigation, supply chain, value added","PeriodicalId":14920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agroindustrial Technology","volume":"5 1","pages":"61-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KINERJA, NILAI TAMBAH DAN MITIGASI RISIKO RANTAI PASOK AGROINDUSTRI BAWANG MERAH\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Resti Pamungkassari, Marimin, dan Indah Yuliasih\",\"doi\":\"10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2018.28.1.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The supply chain of shallot agroindustry is in urgent situation owing to theimbalance risk and added-value distribution of the actors in the supply chain. The purposes of this research were (1) to identify the mechanism and performance of shallot supply chain; (2) to measure the added-value of supply chain actors; (3) to identify and mitigate the risk in shallot supply chain; and (4) to select the strategy to improve the performances, added-value, and risk mitigation ofshallot supply chain. Supply Chain Operations Reference - Analytical Hierarchy Process ( SCOR-AHP)wereemployed to measure the performance of shallot supply chain.Hayami method was used to analyze the added-value.House of Risk (HOR)was used to identify and mitigate the risk, while the strategies for the improvements were formulated using Analytic Network Process-Benefit Opportunity Cost Risk analysis (ANP-BOCR) method. Analysis on the supply chain performance showed those classified as below average were farmer (75.38%), first collector (74.43%), and industry (74.79%), whereasthe second collector hadagood performance (91.97%). Added-value ratios were for the industry of 53.75%, farmer of 46.06%, first collector of 8.88%, and second collector of 5.39%.Total effectivity measurement of risk mitigation to prioritized risk agent resulted the farmer had11 preventive actions,the collectors had9 and the industry had8. The supply chain evaluation resulted in four alternatives for the improvement strategy of the performance, added-value and risk mitigation.The best alternative with the highest BO/CR ratio was the implementation of the SOP of proper cultivation and post-harvesting method. Keywords: shallot agroindustry, risk mitigation, supply chain, value added\",\"PeriodicalId\":14920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agroindustrial Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"61-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agroindustrial Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2018.28.1.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agroindustrial Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2018.28.1.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由于供应链参与者的风险和附加价值分配不平衡,大葱农业产业的供应链处于紧急状态。本研究的目的是:(1)识别大葱供应链的机制和绩效;(2)衡量供应链行为者的增加值;(3)识别和降低青葱供应链风险;(4)选择提高青葱供应链绩效、增加价值和降低风险的策略。采用供应链运作参考-层次分析法(SCOR-AHP)对青葱供应链绩效进行测度。采用Hayami法进行附加值分析。采用风险之家(House of Risk, HOR)识别和降低风险,并采用网络过程-收益-机会成本风险分析(ANP-BOCR)方法制定改进策略。对供应链绩效的分析显示,低于平均水平的是农民(75.38%)、第一收集者(74.43%)和行业(74.79%),而第二收集者表现良好(91.97%)。工业增加值比为53.75%,农民增加值比为46.06%,第一收集者增加值比为8.88%,第二收集者增加值比为5.39%。风险缓减对优先风险因子的总有效性测量结果显示,农民有11项预防措施,收集者有9项,行业有8项。供应链评价为绩效、增值和风险缓解改进战略提供了四种备选方案。BO/CR最高的选择是采用适宜栽培采收的SOP方法。关键词:大葱农业,风险缓解,供应链,增值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS KINERJA, NILAI TAMBAH DAN MITIGASI RISIKO RANTAI PASOK AGROINDUSTRI BAWANG MERAH
The supply chain of shallot agroindustry is in urgent situation owing to theimbalance risk and added-value distribution of the actors in the supply chain. The purposes of this research were (1) to identify the mechanism and performance of shallot supply chain; (2) to measure the added-value of supply chain actors; (3) to identify and mitigate the risk in shallot supply chain; and (4) to select the strategy to improve the performances, added-value, and risk mitigation ofshallot supply chain. Supply Chain Operations Reference - Analytical Hierarchy Process ( SCOR-AHP)wereemployed to measure the performance of shallot supply chain.Hayami method was used to analyze the added-value.House of Risk (HOR)was used to identify and mitigate the risk, while the strategies for the improvements were formulated using Analytic Network Process-Benefit Opportunity Cost Risk analysis (ANP-BOCR) method. Analysis on the supply chain performance showed those classified as below average were farmer (75.38%), first collector (74.43%), and industry (74.79%), whereasthe second collector hadagood performance (91.97%). Added-value ratios were for the industry of 53.75%, farmer of 46.06%, first collector of 8.88%, and second collector of 5.39%.Total effectivity measurement of risk mitigation to prioritized risk agent resulted the farmer had11 preventive actions,the collectors had9 and the industry had8. The supply chain evaluation resulted in four alternatives for the improvement strategy of the performance, added-value and risk mitigation.The best alternative with the highest BO/CR ratio was the implementation of the SOP of proper cultivation and post-harvesting method. Keywords: shallot agroindustry, risk mitigation, supply chain, value added
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frozen Tilapia Fillets Business Process Analysis Using Integration Definition for Function Modelling Fried Chicken Consumer’s Preference and Purchase Decision Analysis During Covid 19 Pandemic Era Potential Risk of Work Accident in The Production Process of Gudeg Chicken using The Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Method Analysis of Consumers’ Preferences for Melon Using the Conjoint Method Production of Biodegradable Straw from Banana Peel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1